1. Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features
- Author
-
Santiago Soliveres, Tesfaye Wubet, Daniel Prati, Peter Manning, Nadja K. Simons, Rubén D. Manzanedo, Martin Ehbrecht, Marco Tschapka, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Andrea Polle, Rodica Pena, Fons van der Plas, Liliane Ruess, Sebastian Seibold, Kezia Goldmann, Ingo Schönig, Marion Schrumpf, Jörg Müller, Swen C. Renner, Peter Schall, Christian Ammer, Steffen Boch, Caterina Penone, María R. Felipe-Lucia, Emily F. Solly, Martin M. Gossner, Jürgen Bauhus, Kirsten Jung, François Buscot, Eric Allan, Markus Fischer, Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, and Gestión de Ecosistemas y de la Biodiversidad (GEB)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Canopy ,Specialisation ,Forest management ,Biodiversity ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Multidiversity ,Trees ,Temperate forests ,Dark diversity ,ddc:570 ,Animals ,Global change ,Land-use ,Institut für Biochemie und Biologie ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Trophic level ,Biodiversity exploratories ,Land use ,Ecology ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Fungi ,Temperate forest ,Ecología ,15. Life on land ,Species richness ,Temperate rainforest - Abstract
While forest management strongly influences biodiversity, it remains unclear how the structural and compositional changes caused by management affect different community dimensions (e.g. richness, specialisation, abundance or completeness) and how this differs between taxa. We assessed the effects of nine forest features (representing stand structure, heterogeneity and tree composition) on thirteen above‐ and belowground trophic groups of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria in 150 temperate forest plots differing in their management type. Canopy cover decreased light resources, which increased community specialisation but reduced overall diversity and abundance. Features increasing resource types and diversifying microhabitats (admixing of oaks and conifers) were important and mostly affected richness. Belowground groups responded differently to those aboveground and had weaker responses to most forest features. Our results show that we need to consider forest features rather than broad management types and highlight the importance of considering several groups and community dimensions to better inform conservation. The work was partly funded by the DFG Priority Program 1374 ‘Infrastructure-Biodiversity-Exploratories’ (DFG-Refno. Po362/18-3). SSo was supported by the Spanish Government under a Ramón y Cajal contract (RYC-2016-20604).
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF