1. Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding
- Author
-
Paul M. Dolman, Roger L. Kitching, Suzan Benedick, Douglas W. Yu, David S. Wilcove, Brent C. Emerson, Paul Woodcock, Trond H. Larsen, Catharine Bruce, Yinqiu Ji, Martin Lott, Louise A. Ashton, Wayne W. Hsu, Taal Levi, Akihiro Nakamura, Xiaoyang Wang, David Edwards, Scott M. Pedley, Keith C. Hamer, Yong Tang, Felicity A. Edwards, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Griffith University, Princeton University, Natural Environment Research Council (UK), National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, and University of East Anglia
- Subjects
Biodiversity ,Surveillance Monitoring ,Systematic Conservation Planning ,Biology ,DNA barcoding ,Dispute resolution ,Species level ,Tropical Forest ,Targeted Monitoring ,Climate change ,Animals ,Environmental DNA ,Restoration ecology ,Arthropods ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Conservation planning ,Electronic Data Processing ,Ecology ,business.industry ,Environmental resource management ,Restoration Ecology ,Computational Biology ,DNA Barcoding ,Verifiable secret sharing ,business ,Heathland ,Environmental Monitoring - Abstract
To manage and conserve biodiversity, one must know what is being lost, where, and why, as well as which remedies are likely to be most effective. Metabarcoding technology can characterise the species compositions of mass samples of eukaryotes or of environmental DNA. Here, we validate metabarcoding by testing it against three high‐quality standard data sets that were collected in Malaysia (tropical), China (subtropical) and the United Kingdom (temperate) and that comprised 55,813 arthropod and bird specimens identified to species level with the expenditure of 2,505 person‐hours of taxonomic expertise. The metabarcode and standard data sets exhibit statistically correlated alpha‐ and beta‐diversities, and the two data sets produce similar policy conclusions for two conservation applications: restoration ecology and systematic conservation planning. Compared with standard biodiversity data sets, metabarcoded samples are taxonomically more comprehensive, many times quicker to produce, less reliant on taxonomic expertise and auditable by third parties, which is essential for dispute resolution., We thank Yang Yahan, Alice Wang, Vincent Moulton, David Warton and Wadud Miah for support and advice and to Ding Zhaoli for sequencing. LA, YT, AN and RK were supported by the Queensland‐Chinese Academy of Sciences (QCAS) Biotechnology Fund (GJHZ1130) and Griffith University. DPE was supported by a STEP fellowship at Princeton University. SP was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council, Forestry Commission, Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service and Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership. Additional support for DPE, PW, FAE, THL and WHH was provided by a grant from the High Meadows Foundation to DSW. YQJ, XYW and DWY were supported by Yunnan Province (20080A001), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (0902281081, KSCX2‐YW‐Z‐1027), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170498), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012FY110800), the University of East Anglia, and the State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution at the Kunming Institute of Zoology.
- Published
- 2013