1. Trade-offs between economic returns, biodiversity, and ecosystem services in the selection of energy peat production sites
- Author
-
Jouni Karhu, Miia Saarimaa, Arto Haara, Matti Laatikainen, Mika Nieminen, Anne Tolvanen, Kari Minkkinen, Paavo Ojanen, Timo Penttilä, Artti Juutinen, Sakari Sarkkola, Department of Forest Sciences, Forest Ecology and Management, and Kari Minkkinen / Principal Investigator
- Subjects
1171 Geosciences ,FLUXES ,Peat ,Natural resource economics ,CONSERVATION ,Geography, Planning and Development ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Biodiversity ,USE SCENARIOS ,02 engineering and technology ,010501 environmental sciences ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Peatlands ,01 natural sciences ,Net present value ,OPTIMIZING LAND-USE ,Ecosystem services ,Production (economics) ,1172 Environmental sciences ,DITCH NETWORK MAINTENANCE ,PHOSPHORUS EXPORT ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Global and Planetary Change ,Ecology ,NITROUS-OXIDE ,021107 urban & regional planning ,PINE MIRES ,15. Life on land ,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) ,Natural resource ,GHG emissions ,Multi-objective optimization ,Water quality ,WATER-QUALITY ,13. Climate action ,Greenhouse gas ,511 Economics ,Environmental science - Abstract
Economic development creates challenges for land-use planners in balancing between increasing the use of natural resources and safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. We developed and utilized multi-objective numeric optimization models to analyze the trade-offs between biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES). The approach was used in the land-use planning process in northern Finland when selecting potential peat production sites as a part of the development of the regional master plan. We first quantified Net Present Value (NPV) of peat production, biodiversity, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and water emissions of peatlands. Then we applied multi-objective optimization to examine the trade-offs between the variables as well as to determine a cost-efficient selection of potential peat production sites, that is, a selection which would simultaneously generate the greatest possible economic returns and environmental benefits. Our results showed that with a relatively small decrease in NPV, a substantial decrease in biodiversity loss and a reduction in water emissions compared to the benchmark level could be attained. However, a significant decrease in GHG emissions resulted in a substantial decrease in NPV. We conclude that it is possible to significantly improve land-use management by applying multi-objective optimization in land-use planning.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF