Search

This work was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Grant REF BB/S000313/1 to MFW) and the Wellcome Trust (Grant 210486/Z/18/Z to CMC). Cyclic nucleotide second messengers are increasingly implicated in prokaryotic anti-viral defence systems. Type III CRISPR systems synthesise cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) upon detecting foreign RNA, activating ancillary nucleases that can be toxic to cells, necessitating mechanisms to remove cOA in systems that operate via immunity rather than abortive infection. Previously, we demonstrated that the Sulfolobus solfataricus type III-D CRISPR complex generates cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA4), activating the ribonuclease Csx1, and showed that subsequent RNA cleavage and dissociation acts as an ‘off-switch’ for the cyclase activity. Subsequently, we identified the cellular ring nuclease Crn1, which slowly degrades cA4 to reset the system (Rouillon et al., 2018), and demonstrated that viruses can subvert type III CRISPR immunity by means of a potent anti-CRISPR ring nuclease variant AcrIII-1. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic interplay between these enzymes, governing cyclic nucleotide levels and infection outcomes in virus-host conflict. Publisher PDF

Type III CRISPR systems detect foreign RNA and activate the cyclase domain of the Cas10 subunit, generating cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) molecules that act as a second messenger to signal infection, activating nucleases that degrade the nucleic acid of both invader and host. This can lead to dormancy or cell death; to avoid this, cells need a way to remove cOA from the cell once a viral infection has been defeated. Enzymes specialised for this task are known as ring nucleases, but are limited in their distribution. Here, we demonstrate that the widespread CRISPR associated protein Csx3, previously described as an RNA deadenylase, is a ring nuclease that rapidly degrades cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA4). The enzyme has an unusual cooperative reaction mechanism involving an active site that spans the interface between two dimers, sandwiching the cA4 substrate. We propose the name Crn3 (CRISPR associated ring nuclease 3) for the Csx3 family., eLife digest Bacteria protect themselves from infections using a system called CRISPR-Cas, which helps the cells to detect and destroy invading threats. The type III CRISPR-Cas system, in particular, is one of the most widespread and efficient at killing viruses. When a bacterium is infected, the CRISPR-Cas system takes a fragment of the genetic material of the virus, and copies it into a molecule. These molecular ‘police mugshots’ are then loaded into a complex of Cas proteins that patrol the cell, looking for a match and destroying any virus that can be identified. Some Cas proteins also produce alarm signals, called cyclic oligoadenylates (cOAs), which can trigger additional defences. However, this process can damage the genetic material of the bacterium, harming or even killing the cell. Enzymes known as ring nucleases can promptly degrade cOAs and turn off this defence system before it causes harm. However, ring nucleases have only been found in a few species to date; how most bacteria deal with cOA toxicity has remained unknown. Here, Athukoralage et al. set out to determine whether a widespread enzyme known as Csx3, which is often associated with type III CRISPR-Cas systems, could be an alternative off switch for cOA triggered defences. Initial ‘test tube’ experiments with purified Csx3 proteins confirmed that the enzyme could indeed break down cOAs. A careful dissection of Csx3’s molecular structure, using biochemical and biophysical techniques, revealed that it worked by ‘sandwiching’ a cOA molecule between two co-operating portions of the enzyme. As a final test, Csx3 was introduced into strains of bacteria genetically engineered to have a fully functional Type III CRISPR-Cas system. In these cells, Csx3 successfully turned off the Type III immune response. These results reveal a new way that bacteria avoid the toxic side effects of their own immune defences. Ultimately, this could pave the way for the development of anti-bacterial drugs that work by blocking Csx3 or similar proteins.

F Nascimento was supported by The Alfred Dunhill Links Foundation. G B Miles and M J Broadhead received support from Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant BB/M021793/1. L Zagoraiou and E Tsape were supported by Fondation Santé. Spinal motor networks are formed by diverse populations of interneurons that set the strength and rhythmicity of behaviors such as locomotion. A small cluster of cholinergic interneurons, expressing the transcription factor Pitx2, modulates the intensity of muscle activation via ‘C-bouton’ inputs to motoneurons. However, the synaptic mechanisms underlying this neuromodulation remain unclear. Here, we confirm in mice that Pitx2+ interneurons are active during fictive locomotion and that their chemogenetic inhibition reduces the amplitude of motor output. Furthermore, after genetic ablation of cholinergic Pitx2+ interneurons, M2 receptor-dependent regulation of the intensity of locomotor output is lost. Conversely, chemogenetic stimulation of Pitx2+ interneurons leads to activation of M2 receptors on motoneurons, regulation of Kv2.1 channels and greater motoneuron output due to an increase in the inter-spike afterhyperpolarization and a reduction in spike half-width. Our findings elucidate synaptic mechanisms by which cholinergic spinal interneurons modulate the final common pathway for motor output. Publisher PDF

The CRISPR system for prokaryotic adaptive immunity provides RNA-mediated protection from viruses and mobile genetic elements. When viral RNA transcripts are detected, type III systems adopt an activated state that licenses DNA interference and synthesis of cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA). cOA activates nucleases and transcription factors that orchestrate the antiviral response. We demonstrate that cOA synthesis is subject to tight temporal control, commencing on target RNA binding, and is deactivated rapidly as target RNA is cleaved and dissociates. Mismatches in the target RNA are well tolerated and still activate the cyclase domain, except when located close to the 3’ end of the target. Phosphorothioate modification reduces target RNA cleavage and stimulates cOA production. The ‘RNA shredding’ activity originally ascribed to type III systems may thus be a reflection of an exquisite mechanism for control of the Cas10 subunit, rather than a direct antiviral defence., eLife digest The gene editing tool often known simply as CRISPR has become well known in recent years. Its potential applications are wide ranging, including uses in research, healthcare and agriculture. Yet, the CRISPR system originated in microbes where it helps to protect them from viral infections. Viruses infect by inserting their own genes into a host cell, and – almost like a pair of scissors – the CRISPR system can cut up the virus’s DNA to stop infections. CRISPR experts know the popular form of CRISPR as type II, but there are others. Type III CRISPR is less useful as a genetic tool but does also protect microbes from viruses. In addition to targeting DNA, type III CRISPR targets the related RNA molecules from viruses. When it encounters RNA from a virus, the type III CRISPR produces a small molecule called cyclic oligoadenylate (or cOA for short). The cOA molecule activates enzymes known as non-specific ribonucleases, which can destroy all the RNA in the cell. This defence is a less subtle than that provided type II CRISPR and can also damage the cell by destroying other RNA molecules that the microbes use to survive. As such, proper regulation is essential to prevent the type III system from unnecessarily killing the infected cell. Rouillon et al. studied the control of the type III CRISPR system from the heat-loving microbe Sulfolobus solfataricus, which is found in volcanic springs. This species has been a model for studies of the CRISPR system for many years, in part because its proteins are very stable which makes them easier to work with in the laboratory. The results show that the type III CRISPR makes cOA by combining four molecules of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into a ring. CRISPR responds immediately to viral RNA in the cell. It also detaches from the RNA as soon as it starts to be destroyed. Rapid activation and silencing of the production cOA ensures that the CRISPR system is tightly controlled. These findings reveal that cOA production is tightly linked to the abundance of viral RNA, ensuring a proportional and timely response to infection. Using cOA amplifies the cell's response because it allows a single RNA molecule to activate a larger change. Type III CRISPR systems are widespread in nature, and a better understanding of them could improve the yield of products, like yoghurt, that depend on healthy bacteria; currently viruses cause a lot of economic damage in this industry. Further research in this area could also lead to new antibiotics that over-activate type III CRISPR to destroy bacterial cells.

Contains fulltext : 195034.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Do people routinely pre-activate the meaning and even the phonological form of upcoming words? The most acclaimed evidence for phonological prediction comes from a 2005 Nature Neuroscience publication by DeLong, Urbach and Kutas, who observed a graded modulation of electrical brain potentials (N400) to nouns and preceding articles by the probability that people use a word to continue the sentence fragment ('cloze'). In our direct replication study spanning 9 laboratories (N=334), pre-registered replication-analyses and exploratory Bayes factor analyses successfully replicated the noun-results but, crucially, not the article-results. Pre-registered single-trial analyses also yielded a statistically significant effect for the nouns but not the articles. Exploratory Bayesian single-trial analyses showed that the article-effect may be non-zero but is likely far smaller than originally reported and too small to observe without very large sample sizes. Our results do not support the view that readers routinely pre-activate the phonological form of predictable words. 24 p.

Ecological variation influences the appearance and maintenance of tool use in animals, either due to necessity or opportunity, but little is known about the relative importance of these two factors. Here, we combined long-term behavioural data on feeding and travelling with six years of field experiments in a wild chimpanzee community. In the experiments, subjects engaged with natural logs, which contained energetically valuable honey that was only accessible through tool use. Engagement with the experiment was highest after periods of low fruit availability involving more travel between food patches, while instances of actual tool-using were significantly influenced by prior travel effort only. Additionally, combining data from the main chimpanzee study communities across Africa supported this result, insofar as groups with larger travel efforts had larger tool repertoires. Travel thus appears to foster tool use in wild chimpanzees and may also have been a driving force in early hominin technological evolution. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16371.001, eLife digest There is currently much debate about the origins of animal culture, including why some animals have acquired the ability to use tools. Ecological problems often lead to the innovation of new tools. For example, a particular desirable food item may not be reachable without using a tool, or environmental conditions may make it difficult for an animal to find food without help. Gruber et al. investigated how particular ecological factors influenced the use of tools in wild chimpanzees by combining controlled field experiments and observational data. When the ecological conditions were the most demanding, wild chimpanzees engaged most with the honey-trap experiment, an experiment where they had to use a tool to extract honey from a cavity dug in a log. Chimpanzees spent a longer time engaging with the apparatus when not much food was available and they had to travel more to obtain it. However, actual tool use during the experiments was only influenced by the travel effort made by the chimpanzees before they engaged with the log, not by how much fruit they had eaten beforehand. In a larger analysis that included data from all of the long-term field sites with habituated chimpanzees, Gruber et al. found that chimpanzee communities that travel further on a daily basis use a wider range of tools to acquire food. These results suggest that travel is an important factor to consider when studying how tool use evolved. Furthermore, these results can be extrapolated to humans, who both travel further and use a greater variety of tools than chimpanzees. Although innovation and culture are closely linked, innovation is mostly performed by individuals whereas culture is a social process. However, both are shaped by the environment. The next step will therefore be to disentangle and quantify the different contributions of environmental, individual and group factors in explaining how culture evolves. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16371.002

Rift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) is a clinically and economically important pathogen increasingly likely to cause widespread epidemics. RVFV virulence depends on the interferon antagonist non-structural protein (NSs), which remains poorly characterized. We identified a stable core domain of RVFV NSs (residues 83–248), and solved its crystal structure, a novel all-helical fold organized into highly ordered fibrils. A hallmark of RVFV pathology is NSs filament formation in infected cell nuclei. Recombinant virus encoding the NSs core domain induced intranuclear filaments, suggesting it contains all essential determinants for nuclear translocation and filament formation. Mutations of key crystal fibril interface residues in viruses encoding full-length NSs completely abrogated intranuclear filament formation in infected cells. We propose the fibrillar arrangement of the NSs core domain in crystals reveals the molecular basis of assembly of this key virulence factor in cell nuclei. Our findings have important implications for fundamental understanding of RVFV virulence., eLife digest Rift Valley fever phlebovirus (RVFV) is a virus of humans and livestock, transmitted by mosquitos and contact with infected animals. Infection can cause severe disease, including hemorrhagic fever, and may lead to death. Historically, the virus was only found in central Africa but it has spread for instance to the Arabian Peninsula. There is a risk that the virus may appear in temperate regions including Europe because global warming is allowing the mosquitos that carry the virus to extend their geographic range. There are no vaccines or treatments available for use in humans so if there is a serious outbreak of the virus it could become an epidemic and cause great economic losses and severe human disease. RVFV relies on a protein called NSs to cause disease. In cells of infected animals and humans NSs forms filaments inside the nucleus, the control center of the cell, and disarms the immune system. However, it is not known precisely how NSs works. To address this question, Barski, Brennan et al. used a technique called X-ray crystallography to study the atomic three-dimensional structure of NSs. This revealed that the center of the protein contains a core domain that causes the filaments to form. Further experiments identified how the NSs core comes together to build the filaments inside the cell nucleus. These findings represent an important step towards understanding how the NSs protein helps RVFV to cause disease in humans and livestock. In the future, this work may aid the development of much needed drugs and vaccines against RVFV.