Search

Protein concentration gradients pattern developing organisms and single cells. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe rod-shaped cells, Pom1 kinase forms gradients with maxima at cell poles. Pom1 controls the timing of mitotic entry by inhibiting Cdr2, which forms stable membrane-associated nodes at mid-cell. Pom1 gradients rely on membrane association regulated by a phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle and lateral diffusion modulated by clustering. Using quantitative PALM imaging, we find individual Pom1 molecules bind the membrane too transiently to diffuse from pole to mid-cell. Instead, we propose they exchange within longer lived clusters forming the functional gradient unit. An allelic series blocking auto-phosphorylation shows that multi-phosphorylation shapes and buffers the gradient to control mid-cell levels, which represent the critical Cdr2-regulating pool. TIRF imaging of this cortical pool demonstrates more Pom1 overlaps with Cdr2 in short than long cells, consistent with Pom1 inhibition of Cdr2 decreasing with cell growth. Thus, the gradients modulate Pom1 mid-cell levels according to cell size., eLife digest All organisms need to know how to arrange different cell types during the development of their organs and tissues. This information is provided by protein concentration patterns, or gradients, that tell cells how to behave based on where they are positioned. The same fundamental principles also work on a smaller scale. For example, although the rod-shaped yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a single-celled organism, it uses protein concentration gradients to control its growth and timing of division. Before S. pombe cells divide, they need to check that they have reached the right size. Several mechanisms contribute to this information. One of them involves a concentration gradient of a protein known as Pom1, which is found on the cell membrane, with more protein at the cell extremities and less towards the middle. Pom1 serves to block the activity of Cdr2 – an enzyme that localizes to the cell middle and controls cell division. An open question has been whether Pom1 levels at the center drop as the cell grows, coordinating growth and division. One explanation for how the Pom1 gradient could be regulated is by the removal and addition of phosphate groups. At the cell’s tip, an enzyme removes phosphate groups from Pom1, causing it to bind to the membrane. As Pom1 diffuses along the membrane, it continuously ‘re-phosphorylates’ itself. This promotes Pom1 to gradually detach, restricting it from spreading along the membrane towards the cell middle. Another explanation is that clusters of Pom1, formed at the membrane, help establish a gradient by moving along the membrane at different rates: larger clusters, formed in high concentration areas, move slower than smaller clusters, causing levels of Pom1 to be higher at the tip, and lower towards the middle. Now, Gerganova et al. set out to find which of these two processes contributes more to shaping the Pom1 gradient, and determine where Pom1 acts on Cdr2. Gerganova et al. used super resolution microscopy to track individual Pom1 molecules inside yeast cells. This revealed two findings. First, that individual Pom1 molecules do not travel all the way from the cell tip to the center, but ‘hop’ between clusters as they move towards the middle. Second, in longer cells levels of Pom1 on the membrane drop at the center, where Pom1 encounters Cdr2. As a result, Cdr2 will come across higher levels of Pom1 in short cells, but low levels of Pom1 in long cells. This allows Pom1 to act as a measure of cell size, preventing short cells from dividing too soon. The role of clusters in creating gradients is not only relevant for yeast cell division. It could potentially apply to the gradients that organize cells and tissues in different organisms. Future work could examine whether similar principles apply in more complex systems.

Faithfull genome partitioning during cell division relies on the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC), a conserved signaling pathway that delays anaphase onset until all chromosomes are attached to spindle microtubules. Mps1 kinase is an upstream SAC regulator that promotes the assembly of an anaphase inhibitor through a sequential multi-target phosphorylation cascade. Thus, the SAC is highly responsive to Mps1, whose activity peaks in early mitosis as a result of its T-loop autophosphorylation. However, the mechanism controlling Mps1 inactivation once kinetochores attach to microtubules and the SAC is satisfied remains unknown. Here we show in vitro and in Drosophila that Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) inactivates Mps1 by dephosphorylating its T-loop. PP1-mediated dephosphorylation of Mps1 occurs at kinetochores and in the cytosol, and inactivation of both pools of Mps1 during metaphase is essential to ensure prompt and efficient SAC silencing. Overall, our findings uncover a mechanism of SAC inactivation required for timely mitotic exit. We thank Geert Kops (UMC, Utrecht, The Netherlands), Thomas Maresca (University of Massachu-setts Amherst, USA) and Christian Lehner (University of Zurich, Switzerland) for antibodies, con-structs and fly stocks. We thank Carla Sofia Lopes (i3S, IBMC, University of Porto) and all the members of the Sunkel laboratory for critical and helpful discussions. This article is a result of the project Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000029 - Advancing Cancer Research: From basic knowledge to application, supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). MO is supported by a fellowship from the GABBA PhD program from the University of Porto, PD/BD/105746/2014. JB is supported by an FCT PhD grant SFRH/BD/87871/2012. CC is sup-ported by an FCT investigator position and funding (IF/01755/2014). HM is funded by PRECISE and CODECHECK grants from the European Research Council, FLAD Life Science 2020, and the Louis-Jeantet Young Investigator Career Award.