Search

The RecA/RAD51 nucleoprotein filament is central to the reaction of homologous recombination (HR). Filament activity must be tightly regulated in vivo as unrestrained HR can cause genomic instability. Our mechanistic understanding of HR is restricted by lack of structural information about the regulatory proteins that control filament activity. Here, we describe a structural and functional analysis of the HR inhibitor protein RecX and its mode of interaction with the RecA filament. RecX is a modular protein assembled of repeated three-helix motifs. The relative arrangement of the repeats generates an elongated and curved shape that is well suited for binding within the helical groove of the RecA filament. Structure-based mutagenesis confirms that conserved basic residues on the concave side of RecX are important for repression of RecA activity. Analysis of RecA filament dynamics in the presence of RecX shows that RecX actively promotes filament disassembly. Collectively, our data support a model in which RecX binding to the helical groove of the filament causes local dissociation of RecA protomers, leading to filament destabilisation and HR inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blocked replication forks often need to be processed by recombination proteins prior to replication restart. In Escherichia coli, the UvrD repair helicase was recently shown to act at inactivated replication forks, where it counteracts a deleterious action of RecA. Using two mutants affected for different subunits of the polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol IIIh), we show here that the anti-RecA action of UvrD at blocked forks reflects two different activities of this enzyme. A defective UvrD mutant is able to antagonize RecA in cells affected for the Pol IIIh catalytic subunit DnaE. In this mutant, RecA action at blocked forks specifically requires the protein RarA (MgsA). We propose that UvrD prevents RecA binding, possibly by counteracting RarA. In contrast, at forks affected for the Pol IIIh clamp (DnaN), RarA is not required for RecA binding and the ATPase function of UvrD is essential to counteract RecA, supporting the idea that UvrD removes RecA from DNA. UvrD action on RecA is conserved in evolution as it can be performed in E. coli by the UvrD homologue from Bacillus subtilis, PcrA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanisms of RecA-mediated three-strand homologous recombination are investigated at the single-molecule level, using magnetic tweezers. Probing the mechanical response of DNA molecules and nucleoprotein filaments in tension and in torsion allows a monitoring of the progression of the exchange in real time, both from the point of view of the RecA-bound single-stranded DNA and from that of the naked double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). We show that strand exchange is able to generate torsion even along a molecule with freely rotating ends. RecA readily depolymerizes during the reaction, a process presenting numerous advantages for the cell's ‘protein economy’ and for the management of topological constraints. Invasion of an untwisted dsDNA by a nucleoprotein filament leads to an exchanged duplex that remains topologically linked to the exchanged single strand, suggesting multiple initiations of strand exchange on the same molecule. Overall, our results seem to support several important assumptions of the monomer redistribution model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The roles of UvrD and Rep DNA helicases of Escherichia coli are not yet fully understood. In particular, the reason for rep uvrD double mutant lethality remains obscure. We reported earlier that mutations in recF, recO or recR genes suppress the lethality of uvrD rep, and proposed that an essential activity common to UvrD and Rep is either to participate in the removal of toxic recombination intermediates or to favour the proper progression of replication. Here, we show that UvrD, but not Rep, directly prevents homologous recombination in vivo. In addition to RecFOR, we provide evidence that RecA contributes to toxicity in the rep uvrD mutant. In vitro, UvrD dismantles the RecA nucleoprotein filament, while Rep has only a marginal activity. We conclude that UvrD and Rep do not share a common activity that is essential in vivo: while Rep appears to act at the replication stage, UvrD plays a role of RecA nucleoprotein filament remover. This activity of UvrD is similar to that of the yeast Srs2 helicase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Escherichia coli RecF, RecO and RecR pro teins have previously been implicated in bacterial recombinational DNA repair at DNA gaps. The RecOR‐facilitated binding of RecA protein to single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) that is bound by single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein (SSB) is much faster if the ssDNA is linear, suggesting that a DNA end (rather than a gap) facilitates binding. In addition, the RecOR complex facilitates RecA protein‐mediated D‐loop formation at the 5′ ends of linear ssDNAs. RecR protein remains associated with the RecA filament and its continued presence is required to prevent filament disassembly. RecF protein competes with RecO protein for RecR protein association and its addition destabilizes RecAOR filaments. An enhanced function of the RecO and RecR proteins can thus be seen in vitro at the 5′ ends of linear ssDNA that is not as evident in DNA gaps. This function is countered by the RecF/RecO competition for association with the RecR protein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The human Rad51 protein is homologous to the Escherichia coli RecA protein and catalyses homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Using single-stranded circular and homologous linear duplex DNA, we show that hRad51 forms stable joint molecules by transfer of the 5′ end of the complementary strand of the linear duplex to the ssDNA. The polarity of strand transfer is therefore 3′ to 5′, defined relative to the ssDNA on which hRad51 initiates filament formation. This polarity is opposite to that observed with RecA. Homologous pairing and strand transfer require stoichiometric amounts of hRad51, corresponding to one hRad51 monomer per three nucleotides of ssDNA. Joint molecules are not observed when the protein is present in limiting or excessive amounts. The human ssDNA binding-protein, hRP-A, stimulates hRad51-mediated reactions. Its effect is consistent with a role in the removal of secondary structures from ssDNA, thereby facilitating the formation of continuous Rad51 filaments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]