1. Occupational exposures and programmatic response to COVID-19 pandemic: an emergency medical services experience
- Author
-
Andrew M. McCoy, Leilani Schwarcz, Tracie Y. Jacinto, Christopher Drucker, Thomas D. Rea, Jim E. Whitney, Michael R. Sayre, Jamie M. Emert, Betty Y. Yang, Tyler A. Morgan, Jeffrey S. Duchin, David L. Murphy, Joel V. Bodenman, Catherine R. Counts, and Leslie M. Barnard
- Subjects
Male ,Emergency Medical Services ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,COVID-19 Testing ,0302 clinical medicine ,Public health surveillance ,Pandemic ,Emergency medical services ,Mass Screening ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,General Medicine ,prehospital care ,Quarantine ,Workforce ,Emergency Medicine ,Female ,Occupational exposure ,Medical emergency ,Report from the Front ,Coronavirus Infections ,Risk assessment ,Washington ,safety ,disaster planning and response ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Risk Assessment ,first responders ,Betacoronavirus ,03 medical and health sciences ,Occupational Exposure ,Humans ,operational ,Pandemics ,Personal Protective Equipment ,Personal protective equipment ,Mass screening ,Retrospective Studies ,research ,Clinical Laboratory Techniques ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,business - Abstract
BackgroundRigorous assessment of occupational COVID-19 risk and personal protective equipment (PPE) use are not well-described. We evaluated 9-1-1 emergency medical services (EMS) encounters for patients with COVID-19 to assess occupational exposure, programmatic strategies to reduce exposure, and PPE use.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort investigation of lab-confirmed COVID-19 patients in King County, WA who received 9-1-1 EMS responses from February 14, 2020 to March 26, 2020. We reviewed dispatch, EMS, and public health surveillance records to evaluate the temporal relationship between exposure and programmatic changes to EMS operations designed to identify high-risk patients, protect the workforce, and conserve PPE.ResultsThere were 274 EMS encounters for 220 unique COVID-19 patients involving 700 unique EMS providers with 988 EMS person-encounters. Use of “full” PPE including mask, eye protection, gown and gloves (MEGG) was 67%. There were 151 person-exposures among 129 individuals, who required 981 quarantine days. Of the 700 EMS providers, 3 (0.4%) tested positive within 14 days of encounter. Programmatic changes were associated with a temporal reduction in exposures. When stratified at the study encounters midpoint, 94% (142/151) of exposures occurred during the first 137 EMS encounters compared to 6% (9/151) during the second 137 EMS encounters (pConclusionLess than 0.5% of EMS providers experienced COVID-19 illness within 14 days of occupational encounter. Programmatic strategies were associated with a reduction in exposures, while achieving a measured use of PPE.
- Published
- 2020