Search

In the past decades, dietary guidelines focused on reducing saturated fat as the primary strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention, neglecting the many other potential effects of diet on health, in particular the harmful effects of sugar. A greater intake of soft drinks (sugar-sweetened beverages), for example, is associated with a 44% increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome, a higher risk of obesity, and a 26% increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus. Carbohydrates comprise around 55% of the typical western diet, ranging from 200 to 350 g/day in relation to a person’s overall caloric intake. For long-term weight gain, food rich in refined grains, starches, and sugar appear to be major culprits. Low-carbohydrate diets restrict daily carbohydrates between 20 and 50 g, as in clinical ketogenic diets. The results of controlled trials show that people on ketogenic diets (a diet with no more than 50 g carbohydrates/day) tend to lose more weight than people on low-fat diets. Moreover, there is no good evidence for recommending low-fat diets, as low-carbohydrate diets lead to significantly greater weight loss (1.15 kg) than did low-fat interventions. However, the magnitude of such a benefit is small. As the quality of ingested carbohydrates seems more important than the quantity for health outcomes, people with metabolic disorders should avoid or substantially reduce low-fiber, rapidly digested, refined grains, starches, and added sugars. So, the consumption of the right carbohydrates (high-fiber, slowly digested, and whole grains), in a moderately lower amount (between 40 and 50% of daily energy content), is compatible with a state of good health and may represent a scientifically-based and palatable choice for people with metabolic disorders.

Purpose: To describe gender differences concerning glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetic complications, concomitant pathologies, and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), in a population of young adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We collected data from 300 consecutively patients (168 males and 132 females), aged 18–30 years, among those admitted at Diabetes Unit of University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” (Naples, Italy) from March 2012 to January 2017. Circulating levels of seven EPCs phenotypes were determined by flow cytometry. Results: As compared to men, women with type 1 diabetes had a significantly higher HbA1c levels (%, 8.4 ± 1.3 vs. 8.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.020), body mass index (Kg/m2, 24.8 ± 4.2 vs. 23.9 ± 3.9, P = 0.034), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL, 61.7 ± 13.7 vs. 54.7 ± 13.9, P < 0.001), and a lower count of both CD133+KDR+ and CD34+KDR+CD133+ EPCs (P = 0.022, P < 0.001, respectively). A higher proportion of women had overweight/obesity, and thyroiditis; smoking and sexual dysfunctions were more prevalent in men than in women. Conclusions: Young adults with type 1 diabetes present gender differences with regard to glycemic control, prevalence of some cardiovascular risk factors, sexual dysfunctions and circulating levels of EPCs, most often to the detriment of women.

Exposure to small particulate matter (PM2.5) has become the 5th highest ranking risk factor for death, responsible for 4.2 million deaths worldwide. PM pollution is also associated with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, and may contribute to deteriorate the already poor cardiometabolic outlook of the diabetic patient. Although most sources of outdoor air pollution are well beyond the control of individuals, there is still room for personal action. Health behaviors (smoking cessation, avoiding obesity, and increasing physical activity) may increase the poor life expectancy of individuals in the lowest income quartile of the Western population; moreover, a favorable lifestyle, (no current smoking, no obesity, physical activity at least once weekly, and a healthy diet pattern), may cut by nearly 50% the risk of coronary heart disease among people at high genetic risk. Things seem not immutable, as individual healthy choices do matter.

Continuous glucose monitoring associated with intensive insulin regimens represents a useful tool to lower HbA1c in selected adults with type 1 diabetes. Recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated greater glycemic benefits in type 1 diabetic patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin and continuous glucose monitoring over usual care. These positive outcomes, however, are counter-balanced by several limitations that restrict the use of continuous glucose monitoring in the real life, including the apparent lack of benefits in children and pregnant diabetic women, the high cost, the stringent patients’ selection, and the presence of a multi-disciplinary team with specific expertise. Pros and Cons of using continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetic patients with multiple daily injections of insulin are here discussed.

Cancer may impair sexual function in women. We provide an overview of studies that address Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) in women with cancer with a meta-analysis of observational studies that used a validated diagnostic tool. Searches included MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published from January 2000 to 31 December 2014. Every included study had to involve at least 30 cancer patients, to investigate FSD based on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and to have been published in peer-review journals. Duplicate independent data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Data were pooled using a random effects model if statistical heterogeneity was present. The main outcomes were FSFI total score and FSD prevalence. FSFI is a 19-item self-report instrument for assessing key dimensions of female sexual function. A value less than 26.55 is consistent with FSD. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 27 reported FSFI scores, and 16 FSD prevalence. Most studies (56 %) had low to moderate quality. The mean value of FSFI was lower than 20 at all cancer sites: 16.25 (pooled random effect, 95 % CI 14.91-17.58, I (2) = 14.5 %) for colorectal cancer, 18.11 (95 % CI 14.45-21.77, I (2) = 97.8 %) for gynecological cancer, and 19.58 (95 % CI 17.64-21.53, I (2) = 90.9 %) for breast cancer. FSD prevalence was higher than 60 % at all cancer sites, with the highest value for gynecological cancer (78.44 %, 95 % CI 68.36-88.52 %, I (2) = 94.1 %). Women with cancer showed low FSFI scores with a high prevalence of FSD. Cancer may impair sexual function in women. We provide an overview of studies that address Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) in women with cancer with a meta-analysis of observational studies that used a validated diagnostic tool. Searches included MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies published from January 2000 to 31 December 2014. Every included study had to involve at least 30 cancer patients, to investigate FSD based on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and to have been published in peer-review journals. Duplicate independent data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Data were pooled using a random effects model if statistical heterogeneity was present. The main outcomes were FSFI total score and FSD prevalence. FSFI is a 19-item self-report instrument for assessing key dimensions of female sexual function. A value less than 26.55 is consistent with FSD. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 27 reported FSFI scores, and 16 FSD prevalence. Most studies (56 %) had low to moderate quality. The mean value of FSFI was lower than 20 at all cancer sites: 16.25 (pooled random effect, 95 % CI 14.91–17.58, I2 = 14.5 %) for colorectal cancer, 18.11 (95 % CI 14.45–21.77, I2 = 97.8 %) for gynecological cancer, and 19.58 (95 % CI 17.64–21.53, I2 = 90.9 %) for breast cancer. FSD prevalence was higher than 60 % at all cancer sites, with the highest value for gynecological cancer (78.44 %, 95 % CI 68.36–88.52 %, I2 = 94.1 %). Women with cancer showed low FSFI scores with a high prevalence of FSD.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of intensified insulin regimens (basal-bolus versus premixed) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. We conducted an electronic search until March 2015 on many electronic databases including online registries of ongoing trials. All RCTs comparing basal-bolus with premixed insulin regimens, with a duration of >12 weeks and with >30 patients per arm, were included. Investigators extracted data on study characteristics, outcome measures, and methodological quality. We found thirteen RCTs lasting 16-60 weeks and involving 5255 patients assessed for the primary endpoint (reduction of HbA1c from baseline). Meta-analysis of change in HbA1c level between basal-bolus and premixed insulin regimens resulted in a small and non-significant difference of 0.09% (95% CI -0.03 to 0.21), with substantial heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 74.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the event rate for overall hypoglycemia (0.16 episode/patient/year, 95%CI -2.07 to 2.3), weight change (-0.21 kg, -0.164 to 0.185), and daily insulin dose (-0.54 U/day, -2.7 to 1.6). The likelihood for reaching the HbA1c

Despite the availability of many new treatment options for type 2 diabetes, the proportion of patients achieving the HbA1c target < 7.0% remains around 50%. We put forward the hypothesis that the unchanged HbA1c results, observed in the last decade in type 2 diabetes patients, are also a consequence of medication nonadherence and clinical inertia. Poor medication-taking behavior is usually defined as medication nonadherence and is responsible for uncontrolled hemoglobin A1c level in 23% of cases. Medication nonadherence may also affect clinical outcomes, as diabetic patients with good adherence (≥80%) had a significant 10% lower rate of hospitalization events and a significant 28% lower rate of all-cause mortality when compared with patients with poor adherence (

In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), more intensive glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes leads to a modest (9%) reduction in major cardiovascular events (MACE), associated with a 20% reduction of kidney events and 13% reduction of eye events. The FDA issued guidance in 2008 led to the conduct of numerous cardiovascular outcomes (CVOT) trials to assess cardiovascular safety of new antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. The results of these trials show that insulin glargine, three different dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (saxagliptin, alogliptin, and sitagliptin) and lixisenatide (a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist) produce no significant difference in CVOT when compared with usual care or placebo. Other trials with newer diabetes drugs, including empagliflozin and canagliflozin (two sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors), liraglutide and semaglutide (two GLP-1 receptor agonists) succeeded in demonstrating CV benefit in people with type 2 diabetes. In the last two decades, the equation “diabetes equals myocardial infarction” have contributed to the development of preventive therapy for risk factors in diabetes. In both primary and secondary prevention, the diabetic patients with high rates of statin and aspirin treatment have improved CV outcome, as compared with non-users. The drugs used to reduce glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes seem important for the ultimate cardiovascular outcome: the combination of intensive glycemic control, when safely attainable, with newer diabetes drugs (empagliflozin, canagliflozin, liraglutide, and semaglutide) may decrease the incidence of MACE, nephropathy and retinopathy. Moreover, depending on the drug used, CV mortality and heart failure may also be reduced.

No specific diet is recommended to prevent type 2 diabetes. We did a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to assess the association between different diets and prevention of type 2 diabetes. We did a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and ISI web of knowledge) until August 2013 using predefined criteria. We included prospective cohort studies that evaluated the role of different diets in type 2 diabetes prevention. Studies were selected by 2 independent reviewers. We did random-effects meta-analyses to determine the relative risk (RR) of incident diabetes associated with healthful dietary patterns. A total of 21,372 cases of incident diabetes, from 18 prospective studies, with 20 cohorts, in 4 world regions were identified. In the random-effect meta-analysis of the 20 cohorts, RR was 0.80 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.74-0.86, P < 0.001), with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 57 %, P = 0.001) and no evidence of publication bias (Egger's test, P = 0.653). Exclusion of two cohorts produced identical RR (0.80, 95 % CI 0.76-0.84), with nonsignificant heterogeneity (I 2 = 9 %). The risk of incident diabetes did not appreciably change considering the geography (USA, Europe, and Asia), the duration of follow-up (10 years), and type of diets (Mediterranean and DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, diets). There was a difference between at risk and general population (P = 0.0487), but the evidence was limited to two studies only. The results of our study demonstrate that several healthy diets are equally and consistently associated with a 20 % reduced risk of future type 2 diabetes.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence on the association of metabolic syndrome and its components with colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. A systematic literature search of multiple electronic databases was conducted and complemented by cross-referencing to identify studies published before 31 October 2012. Every included study was to report risk estimates with 95 % confidence intervals for the association between metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer (incidence or mortality). Core items of identified studies were independently extracted by two reviewers, and results were summarized by standard methods of meta-analysis. We identified 17 studies, which reported on 49 data sets with 11,462 cancer cases. Metabolic syndrome was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in both men (RR: 1.33, 95 % CI 1.18-1.50, and 1.36, 1.25-1.48, respectively) and women (RR: 1.41, 1.18-1.70, and 1.16, 1.03-1.30, respectively). The risk estimates changed little depending on type of study (cohort vs non cohort), populations (US, Europe, Asia), cancer site (colon and rectum), or definition of the syndrome. The risk estimates for any single factor of the syndrome were significant for higher values of BMI/waist (RR: 1.19, 95 % CI 1.10-1.28), dysglycemia (RR: 1.29, 1.11-1.49), and higher blood pressure (RR: 1.09, 1.01-1.18). Dysglycemia and/or higher BMI/waist explained most of the risk associated with metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in both sexes. The risk conveyed by the full syndrome is not superior to the sum of its parts.

Diabetes mellitus and cancer are two growing health problems. They have in common many modifiable risk factors including sex, age, obesity, physical activity, diet, alcohol, and smoking, and have a long latency before overtly manifesting. Patients with diabetes experience a roughly 20–25% higher cancer incidence compared to individuals without diabetes, and it depends on cancer site. Moreover, patients with diabetes who further develop cancer have increased early and late mortality in comparison with cancer patients without diabetes. Prediabetes and metabolic syndrome are also related to an increased risk of developing and die from cancer. Possible mechanisms linking diabetes and prediabetes with cancer include hyperglycemia (endogenous or exogenous), hyperinsulinemia, and alterations of insulin-like growth factor system, chronic subclinical inflammation, abnormalities in sex hormone metabolism, and adipokines. It becomes crucial to define the right orientation of the associations between diabetes and cancer in order to identify the modifiable pathogenic mechanisms. The common soil hypothesis claims that prediabetes and diabetes, as well as metabolic syndrome, may be considered a surrogate sign for dietary risk factors of cancer. The clepsydra of foods may help choose foods associated with healthy benefit while avoiding foods associated with harm, including cancer.

Because of the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes, the need to intensify treatment to manage hyperglycemia is expanding. Premixed insulin regimens were designed to maximize patient convenience and reduce the number of daily injections required by providing both rapid-acting and intermediate-acting components in one formulation. Although the basal bolus insulin regimen is considered by many as “the golden standard” in reaching goals of glycemic control, proper use of intensified insulin regimens, such as basal bolus or premixed, will result in similar HbA1c reduction, hypoglycemic events, and weight gain. At the same number of daily insulin injections (2 shots/day), the premixed regimen is associated with a significant 0.2 % HbA1c decrease, as compared with the basal plus regimen (one shot of long-acting plus one shot of short-acting insulin). The choice of insulin regimen should consider the preferences, and resources of the individual and the family for adapting treatment to the patient needs. At last, the process of insulin initiation and intensification in type 2 diabetes must be carried out in the context of patient safety, minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, weight gain, and injection burden.

Ability to predict which patients might benefit more of therapy might facilitate personalization of treatment. The aim of this study was to obtain information about clinical characteristics which might predict the HbA1c response to DPP-4 inhibitors. We conducted an electronic search without restriction for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving DPP-4 inhibitors (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin). RCTs were included if they lasted at least 12 weeks, reported the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on HbA1c level, and the number of patients in any arm was >30. We did a meta-regression analysis. Seventy-eight articles were eligible, with 79 arms and 20,503 patients. For all arms, the decrease of HbA1c was −0.74 % (95 % CI −0.80 to −0.67 %), with considerable heterogeneity (I 2 = 97 %, P

To evaluate whether continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) may have any advantage over multiple daily injections (MDI) on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in young patients with Type 1 diabetes in transition to an adult diabetes center. The study population consisted of 125 patients on MDI; 38 out of the 43 patients considered eligible for CSII completed the study and the 82 remaining on MDI served as control group. Glycemic control and treatment satisfaction [diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ)] were evaluated in all patients at baseline and after 12 weeks. At baseline, the two groups were well matched for demographic characteristics and glycemic control. DTSQ score was lower in CSII group (21.1 ± 8.8 vs. 25.1 ± 7.1, P = 0.011). After 12 weeks, a similar decrease in HbA1C was observed in both groups [difference −0.3 % (95 % CI −0.6 to 0.1, P = 0.847)]. Mean amplitude glucose excursions, blood glucose standard deviation, and overall hypoglycemia were significantly reduced in CSII group. DTSQ overall score increased in CSII and decreased in MDI (difference between groups = 9.9, 95 % CI 8.0–12.0, P

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived stem cells able to migrate to sites of damaged endothelium and differentiate into endothelial cells, thereby contributing to vascular repair. Recent studies demonstrated a reduction of EPCs in patients with diabetes mellitus or erectile dysfunction (ED). The aim of this study was to evaluate the circulating levels of different EPCs phenotypes and their relation with testosterone levels in young type 1 diabetic patients with ED. We studied 118 consecutively type 1 diabetic patients and 60 age-matched healthy controls. Erectile function was assessed by completing the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and EPCs levels by flow cytometry. Testosterone concentrations were evaluated in all the study population. We identified 38 diabetic patients with ED (Group 1) and 80 patients without ED (Group 2). CD34+KDR+CD133+ cells were significantly lower in patients in Group 1 as compared with those in Group 2 [median and interquartile range, n/106 events, 12 (6–16) vs. 18 (13–22), P < 0.001)]. In all participants in the study, there was a significant correlation between circulating CD34+KDR+CD133+ cells and testosterone levels (r = 0.410, P < 0.001), which was highest in Group 1, intermediate in Group 2, and lowest in Group 3 (controls). There was a significant correlation between IIEF-5 score and both CD34+KDR+ (r = 0.459, P = 0.003) and CD34+KDR+CD133+ (r = 0.316, P = 0.050) cells among patients of Group 1, as well as between testosterone levels and most of the EPCs phenotypes. Finally, multivariate regression analysis identified levels of circulating CD34+KDR+ cells as an independent risk factor for ED (β-coefficient 0.348, P = 0.007). In conclusion, type 1 diabetic patients with ED show reduced levels of CD34+KDR+CD133+ cells, whose number correlates with IIEF. Further studies are needed to fully understand the exact mechanisms by which testosterone regulates vascular homeostasis.