Search

Serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and the induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) is recently well documented as the mechanisms for the insulin resistance. However, the relationship between these two mechanisms is not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the involvement of SOCS3 and IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in TNFalpha-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. TNFalpha transiently stimulated serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 from 10 min to 1 h, whereas insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was inhibited only after TNFalpha treatment longer than 4 h. These results suggest that serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 alone is not the major mechanism for the inhibited insulin signaling by TNFalpha. TNFalpha stimulation longer than 4 h enhanced the expression of SOCS3 and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 phosphorylation, concomitantly with the production of IL-6. Anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody ameliorated suppressed insulin signaling by 24 h TNFalpha treatment, when it partially decreased SOCS3 induction and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 phosphorylation. These results suggest that SOCS3 induction is involved in inhibited insulin signaling by TNFalpha. However, low-level expression of SOCS3 by IL-6 or adenovirus vector did not affect insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Interestingly, when IRS-1 serine phosphorylation was enhanced by TNFalpha or anisomycin in the presence of low-level SOCS3, IRS-1 degradation was remarkably enhanced. Taken together, both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and SOCS3 induction are necessary, but one of the pair is not sufficient for the inhibited insulin signaling. Chronic TNFalpha may inhibit insulin signaling effectively because it causes both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and the following SOCS3 induction in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

To examine the functional role of Shc tyrosine phosphorylation in IGF-1 signaling, wild-type (WT)-Shc and Y239,240,317F (3F)-Shc were transiently transfected into L6 myoblasts. IGF-1 signaling was compared among the transfected cells. IGF-1-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and its subsequent association with Grb2 were increased in WT-Shc cells, whereas they were decreased in 3F-Shc cells compared with those in parental L6 cells. Consistent with their changes, IGF-1-induced MAPK activation and thymidine incorporation were enhanced in WT-Shc cells, whereas they were again decreased in 3F-Shc cells. It is possible that Shc and insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 can interact competitively, via their phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains, with the activated IGF-1 receptor. In this regard, IGF-1-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 was decreased by overexpressing both WT-Shc and 3F-Shc cells. Consistent with the decrease, IGF-1-induced IRS-1 association with the p85 subunit of PI3K and activation of PI3K and Akt were reduced in both WT-Shc and 3F-Shc cells. As a result, IGF-1-induced glycogen synthesis was also decreased in both cells. Furthermore, expression of Shc PTB domain alone inhibited IGF-1 stimulation of Akt and glycogen synthesis. These results indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc is important for IGF-1 stimulation of MAPK leading to mitogenesis and that Shc, via its PTB domain, negatively regulates IGF-1-induced glycogen synthesis by competing with IRS-1, which is not relevant to Shc tyrosine phosphorylation.

To examine the role of SHIP in insulin-induced mitogenic signaling, we used a truncated SHIP lacking the SH2 domain (deltaSH2-SHIP) and a Y917/1020F-SHIP (2F-SHIP) in which two tyrosines contributing to Shc binding were mutated to phenylalanine. Wild-type (WT)-, deltaSH2-, and 2F-SHIP were transiently transfected into Rat1 fibroblasts overexpressing insulin receptors (HIRc). Insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of WT-SHIP and deltaSH2-SHIP, whereas tyrosine phosphorylation of 2F-SHIP was not detectable, indicating that 917/1020-Tyr are key phosphorylation sites on SHIP. Although SHIP can bind via its 917/1020-Tyr residues and SH2 domain to Shc PTB domain and 317-Tyr residue, respectively, insulin-induced SHIP association with Shc was more greatly decreased in 2F-SHIP cells than that in deltaSH2-SHIP cells. Insulin stimulation of Shc association with Grb2, which is important for p21ras-MAP kinase activation, was decreased by overexpression of WT- and 2F-SHIP. Importantly, insulin-induced Shc x Grb2 association was not detectably reduced in deltaSH2-SHIP cells. In accordance with the extent of Shc association with Grb2, insulin-induced MAP kinase activation was relatively decreased in both WT-SHIP and 2F-SHIP cells, but not in deltaSH2-SHIP cells. To examine the functional role of SHIP in insulin's biological action, insulin-induced mitogenesis was compared among these transfected cells. Insulin stimulation of thymidine incorporation and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation was decreased in WT-SHIP cells compared with that of control HIRc cells. Expression of 2F-SHIP also significantly reduced insulin-induced mitogenesis, whereas it was only slightly affected by overexpression of deltaSH2-SHIP. Furthermore, the reduction of insulin-induced mitogenesis in WT-SHIP cells was partly compensated by coexpression of Shc. These results indicate that SHIP plays a negative regulatory role in insulin-induced mitogenesis and that the SH2 domain of SHIP is important for its negative regulatory function.

To examine the molecular mechanism of insulin receptor trafficking, we investigated the intracellular signaling molecules that regulate this process in Rat1 fibroblasts overexpressing insulin receptors. Cellular localization of insulin receptors was assessed by confocal laser microscopy with indirect immunofluorescence staining. Insulin receptors were visualized diffusely in the basal state. Insulin treatment induced the change of insulin receptor localization to perinuclear compartment. This insulin-induced insulin receptor trafficking was not affected by treatment of the cells with PI3-kinase inhibitor (wortmannin), whereas treatment with MEK [mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-Erk kinase] inhibitor (PD98059) partly inhibited the process in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, treatment with both wortmannin and PD98059 almost completely inhibited insulin receptor trafficking. The functional importance of PI3-kinase and MAP kinase in the trafficking process was directly assessed by using single cell microinjection analysis. Microinjection of p85-SH2 and/or catalytically inactive MAP kinase ([K71A]Erk1) GST fusion protein gave the same results as treatment with wortmannin and PD98059. Furthermore, to determine the crucial step for the requirement of PI3-kinase and MAP kinase pathways, the effect of wortmannin and PD98059 on insulin receptor endocytosis was studied. Insulin internalization from the plasma membrane and subsequent insulin degradation were not affected by treatment with wortmannin and PD98059. In contrast, insulin receptor down-regulation from the cell surface and insulin receptor degradation, after prolonged incubation with insulin, were markedly impaired by the treatment. These results suggest that PI3-kinase and MAP kinase pathways synergistically regulate insulin receptor trafficking at a step subsequent to the receptor internalization.

To delineate the signaling pathway leading to glucose transport protein (GLUT4) translocation, we examined the effect of microinjection of the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS), into 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Thirty minutes after the injection of 5 mM GTPgammaS, 40% of injected cells displayed surface GLUT4 staining indicative of GLUT4 translocation compared with 55% for insulin-treated cells and 10% in control IgG-injected cells. Treatment of the cells with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin or coinjection of GST-p85 SH2 fusion protein had no effect on GTPgammaS-mediated GLUT4 translocation. On the other hand, coinjection of antiphosphotyrosine antibodies (PY20) blocked GTPgammaS-induced GLUT4 translocation by 65%. Furthermore, microinjection of GTPgammaS led to the appearance of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins around the periphery of the plasma membrane, as observed by immunostaining with PY20. Treatment of the cells with insulin caused a similar phosphotyrosine-staining pattern. Electroporation of GTPgammaS stimulated 2-deoxy-D-glucose transport to 70% of the extent of insulin stimulation. In addition, immunoblotting with phosphotyrosine antibodies after electroporation of GTPgammaS revealed increased tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including 70- to 80-kDa and 120- to 130-kDa species. These results suggest that GTPgammaS acts upon a signaling pathway either downstream of or parallel to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and that this pathway involves tyrosine-phosphorylated protein(s).

Insulin's stimulation of glucose transport involves the translocation of vesicles containing the glucose transporter GLUT4 to the plasma membrane. Small GTP-binding proteins have been implicated in the regulation of vesicular traffic. We studied the effects of microinjection of wild-type Rab4 glutathione S-transferase fusion protein (WT Rab4), a GTP-binding defective mutant (Rab4 N121I), a guanosine triphosphatase-defective mutant (Rab4 Q67L), and a Rab4 antibody on insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Microinjection of Rab4 N121I and Rab4 antibodies had no effect on basal GLUT4 staining, but inhibited insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation by 50% compared with that in control IgG-injected cells. WT Rab4 and Rab4 Q67L microinjection had no effect on either basal or insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation. Premixing and coinjection of the Rab4 antibody with WT Rab4 almost completely abolished its inhibitory effect on insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation. In contrast, microinjection of an antibody directed against the highly conserved region of Rab3 proteins had no effect on insulin-induced GLUT4. These results point to a direct role of Rab4 in insulin-induced GLUT4 translocation, and that this effect is dependent on nucleotide binding to the protein. We also studied the effect of microinjection of the same proteins on insulin-induced actin filament rearrangement (membrane ruffling) in the same cell line. Microinjection of Rab4 N121I and Rab4 antibodies inhibited insulin-induced membrane ruffling by 40%, whereas WT Rab4 or a Rab3 antibody injection had no effect on cytoskeletal rearrangement. In summary, 1) Rab4 is a necessary component of the insulin/GLUT4 translocation signaling pathway; 2) the function of Rab4 in this pathway requires GTP binding; 3) Rab4 also participates in the process of insulin-induced membrane ruffling; and 4) Rab3 proteins do not seem to be involved in these processes.