Search

Background There are several types of pancreatic mass, so it is important to distinguish between them before treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a mathematical technique that automates learning and recognition of data patterns. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of our AI model using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images of multiple types of pancreatic mass (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC], pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma [PASC], acinar cell carcinoma [ACC], metastatic pancreatic tumor [MPT], neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC], neuroendocrine tumor [NET], solid pseudopapillary neoplasm [SPN], chronic pancreatitis, and autoimmune pancreatitis [AIP]). Methods Patients who underwent EUS were included in this retrospective study. The included patients were divided into training, validation, and test cohorts. Using these cohorts, an AI model that can distinguish pancreatic carcinomas from noncarcinomatous pancreatic lesions was developed using a deep-learning architecture and the diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. Results 22 000 images were generated from 933 patients. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95 %CI) of the AI model for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas in the test cohort were 0.90 (0.84–0.97), 0.94 (0.88–0.98), 0.82 (0.68–0.92), and 0.91 (0.85–0.95), respectively. The per-category sensitivities (95 %CI) of each disease were PDAC 0.96 (0.90–0.99), PASC 1.00 (0.05–1.00), ACC 1.00 (0.22–1.00), MPT 0.33 (0.01–0.91), NEC 1.00 (0.22–1.00), NET 0.93 (0.66–1.00), SPN 1.00 (0.22–1.00), chronic pancreatitis 0.78 (0.52–0.94), and AIP 0.73 (0.39–0.94). Conclusions Our developed AI model can distinguish pancreatic carcinomas from noncarcinomatous pancreatic lesions, but external validation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thereafter, we considered fixing the stent to the stomach wall to avoid recurrence; however, fixing the stent to the stomach directly could have caused it to dislocate. B Video 1 b The cowboy method of fixing an endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy stent to the stomach wall using a detachable snare to prevent repeat deviation of the stent into the esophagus. [Extracted from the article]

3 Views of the procedure. a Endoscopic-ultrasound image of the left lobe of the liver showing B2. b Fluoroscopic image of B2 puncture and cannulation with forward-viewing echoendoscope. A 2.2-cm × 12-cm uncovered duodenal stent (HANAROSTENT; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was advanced over the guidewire traversing the stricture site, both ends of the stent were carefully monitored, and then the stent was successfully deployed (Fig. [Extracted from the article]

Fully covered self-expanding metal stents versus lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent versus plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: clinical outcomes and success. Despite recent reports of endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent [1][2], treatment strategies for WON remain challenging. Lumen apposing metal stents are superior to plastic stents in pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a large international multicenter study. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic bile duct stone (BDS) removal is a well-established treatment; however, the preference for basket or balloon catheters for extraction is operator-dependent. We therefore conducted a multicenter prospective randomized trial to compare catheter performance.Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with a BDS diameter ≤ 10 mm and common bile duct diameter ≤ 15 mm. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that were treated with basket or balloon catheters between October 2013 and September 2014. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete clearance of the duct; the secondary endpoints were the rate and time to complete clearance in one endoscopic session.Results: We initially enrolled 172 consecutive patients; 14 were excluded after randomization. The complete clearance rates were 92.3 % (72/78) in the balloon group and 80.0 % (64 /80) in the basket group. The difference in the rates between the two groups was 12.3 percentage points, indicating non-inferiority of the balloon method (non-inferiority limit -10 %; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). Moreover, the balloon was superior to the basket (P = 0.037). The rate of complete clearance in one endoscopic session was 97.4 % using the balloon and 97.5 % using the basket (P = 1.00). The median times to complete clearance in one endoscopic session were 6.0 minutes (1 - 30) and 7.8 minutes (1 - 37) in the balloon and basket groups, respectively (P = 0.15).Conclusions: For extraction of BDSs ≤ 10 mm, complete endoscopic treatment with a single catheter is more likely when choosing a balloon catheter over a basket catheter.University Hospital Medical Information Network Trials Registry: UMIN000011887. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We attempted to remove the stents, but failed because of hyperplasia into the stents. Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMS) often cause hyperplasia, which can impede stent removal [1][2]. 1 a Guidewire insertion through a mesh gap in the B3 stent. b A fully covered metallic stent (10 mm × 8 cm) is placed through a mesh gap in the B3 stent. c Radiography shows the new B3 stent partially inserted within the first B3 stent. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic bile duct stone (BDS) removal is a well-established treatment; however, the preference for basket or balloon catheters for extraction is operator-dependent. We therefore conducted a multicenter prospective randomized trial to compare catheter performance., Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with a BDS diameter ≤ 10 mm and common bile duct diameter ≤ 15 mm. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that were treated with basket or balloon catheters between October 2013 and September 2014. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete clearance of the duct; the secondary endpoints were the rate and time to complete clearance in one endoscopic session., Results: We initially enrolled 172 consecutive patients; 14 were excluded after randomization. The complete clearance rates were 92.3 % (72/78) in the balloon group and 80.0 % (64 /80) in the basket group. The difference in the rates between the two groups was 12.3 percentage points, indicating non-inferiority of the balloon method (non-inferiority limit -10 %; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). Moreover, the balloon was superior to the basket (P = 0.037). The rate of complete clearance in one endoscopic session was 97.4 % using the balloon and 97.5 % using the basket (P = 1.00). The median times to complete clearance in one endoscopic session were 6.0 minutes (1 - 30) and 7.8 minutes (1 - 37) in the balloon and basket groups, respectively (P = 0.15)., Conclusions: For extraction of BDSs ≤ 10 mm, complete endoscopic treatment with a single catheter is more likely when choosing a balloon catheter over a basket catheter.University Hospital Medical Information Network Trials Registry: UMIN000011887., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)