Search

Background and study aims: The assessment of indications for follow-up colonoscopy may help to improve the allocation of available endoscopy resources. The aim of this study was to assess the timing of early follow-up colonoscopy and surveillance utilization in relation to adenoma detection rate (ADR) at follow-up. Methods: An assessment of the timing and yield of follow-up colonoscopies was performed in patients with non-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a Dutch multicenter study. The primary outcome was the number of patients with a prior (index) colonoscopy. The necessity for follow-up procedures was assessed using the ADR. Results: Of 4800 consecutive patients undergoing a colonoscopy, 1249 non-IBD patients had undergone an index colonoscopy. Of these, follow-up procedures were performed within 1 year in 27% (331/1249). Excluding incomplete colonoscopy, incomplete polypectomy, or poor bowel preparation on index, the ADR on early follow-up was 4% for symptomatic and 26% for asymptomatic patients. Among the asymptomatic patients with a follow-up colonoscopy at >1 year (n=463), an ADR of 23% (108/463) was found. In 27% of these patients, the observed surveillance intervals were in accordance with American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) surveillance recommendations; 60% were classified as over-utilization and 13% as under-utilization according to the AGA. Optimal utilization follow-up colonoscopies had higher ADRs on follow-up compared with overutilized procedures (31% vs. 17%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Follow-up colonoscopy in symptomatic patients within a year has limited value in terms of adenoma detection. A considerable proportion of surveillance colonoscopies are performed too early according to current guidelines, resulting in low detection rates. Both aspects can be targeted for optimal usage in endoscopic capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims: Anastomotic strictures are an important cause of morbidity after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Endoscopic treatment is the primary treatment modality for biliary complications after OLT. The outcome and complications of a progressive stenting protocol are largely unknown. Patients and methods: A longitudinal cohort study of OLTs was conducted. Only patients with late strictures were included. Treatment success was defined as cholangiographic stricture resolution and liver enzymes returning to normal with follow-up of at least 12 months. Results: Between May 2000 and June 2009, 375 OLTs were performed. A duct-to-duct anastomosis was created in 304 cases (81 %). In 63 patients (21 %; 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.5%-25.6 %) an anastomotic stricture developed and progressive stenting was started in 35.During treatment two patients died of a non-treatment-related cause and two patients underwent a second OLT during stent therapy. Therefore 31 patients were available for analysis (male: female 21:10; median age 61 years, range 28-75 years). Progressive stenting required a median number of 5 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures (range 4-11). A median maximum of 4 stents (range 2-8) were inserted. A total of 21 patients (67.7 %; 95%CI 50.1%-81.4 %) developed a treatment-related complication. In 33 out of a total of 155 ERCPs (21.3 %) a complication occurred: cholangitis (n=12), transient cholestasis (n=11), post-ERCP pancreatitis (n=7), and treatment-related pain (n=3). The median follow-up time after stent removal was 28 months (range 12-92). Treatment was successful in 25 patients (80.6 %; 95%CI 63.7%-90.8 %). Conclusion: Progressive stenting for anastomotic strictures after OLT is demanding and burdensome, necessitating a median of 5 ERCP procedures with complications occurring in one out of five procedures. Its success rate however is high (81 %), avoiding surgery in the large majority of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) has occasionally been described for the treatment of uncontrollable esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) as a bridge to an alternative treatment option (i.e. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS]). It is currently not known whether SEMS placement is appropriate for more than temporary hemostasis. This case series report describes five patients in whom EVB could not be controlled with variceal band ligation and who were not suitable to undergo a TIPS procedure at the time of bleeding. SEMS were placed in these patients with the intent of definitive treatment. Successful initial hemostasis was achieved in all five patients, and sustained hemostasis occurred in four. Stents were removed from two patients after>14 days and remained in situ until death in three other patients (range 6-214 days). No complications related to this longer duration were observed. In one case, TIPS could be performed at a later stage. SEMS could be a definitive treatment for uncontrollable esophageal bleeding in patients with a limited life expectancy or those unsuitable for TIPS at the time of bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims: A recent international guideline recommends surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions for patients at risk of progression to gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the distribution and severity of premalignant lesions in risk categorization. Patients and methods: Patients with a previous diagnosis of atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, or low grade dysplasia were invited for surveillance endoscopy with non-targeted biopsy sampling. Biopsy specimens were evaluated by pathologists (four general and one expert) using the Sydney and the operative link for gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) systems, and scores were compared using kappa statistics. Results: 140 patients were included. In 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29%-45%) the severity of premalignant lesions was less than at baseline, while 6% (95%CI 2%-10%) showed progression to more severe lesions. Intestinal metaplasia in the corpus was most likely to progress to more than one location (57%; 95%CI 36%-76%). The proportion of patients with multilocated premalignant lesions increased from 24% at baseline to 31% at surveillance (P=0.014). Intestinal metaplasia was the premalignant lesion most frequently identified in subsequent endoscopies. Intestinal metaplasia regressed in 27% compared with 44% for atrophic gastritis and 100% for low grade dysplasia. Interobserver agreement was excellent for intestinal metaplasia (k=0.81), moderate for dysplasia (k=0.42), and poor for atrophic gastritis (k<0). Conclusions: Premalignant gastric lesions found in the corpus have the highest risk of progression, especially intestinal metaplasia, which has excellent interobserver agreement. This supports the importance of intestinal metaplasia as marker for follow-up in patients with premalignant gastric lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims: Time limitations and unwanted health effects may act as barriers to participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of the study was to measure the time requirements and health effects of colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CTC) screening. Patients and methods: Thiswas a prospective diary study in a consecutive sample within a randomized controlled CRC screening trial, comparing primary colonoscopy and CTC screening for average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years. The diary ended when all screening-related complaints had passed. Results: The diary was returned by 75% (241/322) of colonoscopy and 75% (127/170) of CTC screenees. The median interval between leaving home and returning from the examination was longer for colonoscopy (4 hours and 18 minutes [4:18], interquartile range [IQR] 3:30-5:00) than for CTC (2:30 hours, IQR 2:06-3:00; P<0.001). Similarly, the time to return to routine activities was longer after colonoscopy (3:54 hours, IQR 1:48- 15:00) than after CTC (1:36 hours, IQR 0:54- 4:42). The duration of screening-related symptoms after the examination was shorter for colonoscopy (11:00 hours, IQR 2:54-20:00) than for CTC (22:00 hours; IQR 5:30-47:00; P<0.001). Abdominal complaints were reported more frequently after CTC. Anxiety, pain, and quality of life worsened during the screening process, with no differences between the two examinations. Conclusions: Compared with colonoscopy, CTC screening required less time and allowed screenees to return to their daily activities more quickly. In contrast, CTC was associated with a twofold longer duration of screening-related symptoms. Feelings of anxiety, pain, and quality of life scores were similar during colonoscopy and CTC screening. These results should be incorporated into cost-effectiveness analyses of CRC screening techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients on antithrombotic therapy (ATT) have the highest risk of ongoing bleeding and mortality. Hemospray (Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA) is a novel hemostatic agent for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Initial reports on its use appear promising in terms of initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates. It is unknown whether this also pertains to patients on ATT. The aim of the current study therefore was to evaluate the efficacy of Hemospray in the treatment of UGIB in patients taking ATTs. A total of 16 unselected consecutive patients with UGIB who were treated with Hemospray were analyzed (eight taking ATT for various indications and eight not on ATT). Initial hemostasis was achieved after Hemospray application in 5/8 patients on ATT (63 %) and in all eight patients not on therapy (P=0.20). Rebleeding rates were similar in both groups. These preliminary data on the use of Hemospray in the management of UGIB are promising in both patients with and without ATT; however, caution should be exercised for its use in patients on ATT with spurting arterial bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of populationbased screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on management of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening includes 32 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of populationbased screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal includes 24 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of surveillance and other elements in the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of populationbased screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on quality assurance in endoscopy includes 50 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of endoscopy and other elements in the screening process, including multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims: New modalities are available for visualization of the small bowel in patients with possible obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), but their performance requires further comparison. This study compared the diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and capsule endoscopy in patients with OGIB, using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) as the reference standard. Patients and methods: Consecutive consenting patients who were referred for evaluation of OGIB were prospectively included. Patients underwent MRE followed by capsule endoscopy and BAE. Patients with high grade stenosis at MRE did not undergo capsule endoscopy. The reference standard was BAE findings in visualized small-bowel segments and expert panel consensus for segments not visualized during BAE. Results: Over a period of 26 months, 38 patients were included (20 female [53 %]; mean age 58 years, range 28-75 years). Four patients (11 %) did not undergo capsule endoscopy due to high grade small-bowel stenosis at MRE (n=3; 8%) or timing issues (n=1; 3%). Capsule endoscopy was non-diagnostic in one patient. The reference standard identified abnormal findings in 20 patients (53 %). MRE had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 21%, 100%, infinity, and 0.79, respectively. The corresponding values for capsule endoscopy were 61%, 85%, 4.1, and 0.46. The reference standard and capsule endoscopy did not differ in percent positive findings (P=0.34), but MRE differed significantly from the reference BAE (P<0.001). Capsule endoscopy was superior to MRE for detecting abnormalities (P=0.0015). Conclusion: Capsule endoscopy performed better than MRE in the detection of small-bowel abnormality in patients with OGIB. MREmay be considered as an alternative for the initial examination in patients with clinical suspicion of small-bowel stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aim: While colonoscopy screening is widely used in several European countries and the United States, there are no randomized trials to quantify its benefits. The Nordic-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (NordICC) is a multinational, randomized controlled trial aiming at investigating the effect of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. This paper describes the rationale and design of the NordICC trial. Study design: Men and women aged 55 to 64 years are drawn from the population registries in the participating countries and randomly assigned to either once-only colonoscopy screening with removal of all detected lesions, or no screening (standard of care in the trial regions). All individuals are followed for 15 years after inclusion using dedicated national registries. The primary end points of the trial are cumulative CRC-specific death and CRC incidence during 15 years of follow-up. Power analysis: We hypothesize a 50% CRC mortality-reducing efficacy of the colonoscopy intervention and predict 50% compliance, yielding a 25% mortality reduction among those invited to screening. For 90% power and a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, using a 2:1 randomization, 45600 individuals will be randomized to control, and 22800 individuals to the colonoscopy group. Interim analyses of the effect of colonoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality will be performed at 10-year follow-up. Conclusions: The aim of the NordICC trial is to quantify the effectiveness of population-based colonoscopy screening. This will allow development of evidence-based guidelines for CRC screening in the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a quality assurance program that was developed in England to assess patient-centered care in endoscopy. The aim of the current studywas to evaluate patient experiences of colonoscopy using the GRS in order to compare different departments and to provide benchmarks. The study also evaluated factors associated with patient satisfaction. Methods: A GRS questionnaire was used both before and after the procedure in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. The questionnaire assessed the processes associated with the colonoscopy, from making the appointment up until discharge. Mean values and ranges of 12 endoscopy departments were calculated together with P values in order to assess heterogeneity. Results: In total, 1904 pre-procedure and 1532 (80 %) post-procedure questionnaires were returned from 12 endoscopy departments. The mean time patients had to wait for their procedure was 4.3 weeks (range 3.1-5.8 weeks), and 54% (range 35-64%; P<0.001) reported being given a choice of appointment dates/times. Discomfort during colonoscopy was reported by 20% (range 8-40%; P<0.001). Recovery room privacywas satisfactory for 76% of patients (range 66-90%; P<0.05). The majority of patients reported being sufficiently informed about what to do in case of problems after discharge (79 %, range 43-98%; P<0.001), and 85% of individuals stated that they would be willing to repeat the colonoscopy procedure (range 72-92%; P<0.001). Factors associatedwith a decreased willingness to return were the burdensome bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] =0.25; P<0.001), "rushing staff" attitude (OR=0.57; P<0.05), low acceptance of the procedure (OR=0.42; P<0.01), and more discomfort than expected (OR=0.54; P<0.05). Conclusion: Overall patient experiences with colonoscopywere satisfactory, but they also showed considerable variation. This study shows that use of a GRS patient questionnaire is feasible in the Dutch endoscopy setting for the assessment of patient experience. The significant variability between endoscopy units can be used to benchmark services and enable shortcomings to be identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Global Rating Scale (GRS) is a quality assurance program that was developed in England to assess patient-centered care in endoscopy. The aim of the current study was to evaluate patient experiences of colonoscopy using the GRS in order to compare different departments and to provide benchmarks. The study also evaluated factors associated with patient satisfaction. Methods: A GRS questionnaire was used both before and after the procedure in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. The questionnaire assessed the processes associated with the colonoscopy, from making the appointment up until discharge. Mean values and ranges of 12 endoscopy departments were calculated together with P values in order to assess heterogeneity. Results: In total, 1904 pre-procedure and 1532 (80 %) post-procedure questionnaires were returned from 12 endoscopy departments. The mean time patients had to wait for their procedure was 4.3 weeks (range 3.1-5.8 weeks), and 54% (range 35-64%; P<0.001) reported being given a choice of appointment dates/times. Discomfort during colonoscopy was reported by 20% (range 8-40%; P<0.001). Recovery room privacy was satisfactory for 76% of patients (range 66-90%; P<0.05). The majority of patients reported being sufficiently informed about what to do in case of problems after discharge (79 %, range 43-98%; P<0.001), and 85% of individuals stated that they would be willing to repeat the colonoscopy procedure (range 72-92%; P<0.001). Factors associated with a decreased willingness to return were the burdensome bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] =0.25; P<0.001), "rushing staff" attitude (OR=0.57; P<0.05), low acceptance of the procedure (OR=0.42; P<0.01), and more discomfort than expected (OR=0.54; P<0.05). Conclusion: Overall patient experiences with colonos copy were satisfactory, but they also showed considerable variation. This study shows that use of a GRS patient questionnaire is feasible in the Dutch endoscopy setting for the assessment of patient experience. The significant variability between endoscopy units can be used to benchmark services and enable shortcomings to be identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines recommend surveillance after polypectomy. There is variation in the surveillance intervals that are being advised. This variation also affects adherence. Surveillance intervals need to be based on risk factors at index. We therefore aimed to systematically review risk factors of adenoma findings at surveillance colonoscopy. Methods: A systematic literature searchwas performed up to September 2009. Studies that reported on follow-up colonoscopy findings with stratification for index characteristics were included. Pooled relative risks (RR) were calculated using random effects models, and heterogeneity was determined by means of the I2-statistic. Results: A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most important risk factors for adenoma findings were the presence on index colonoscopy of the following: advanced adenomas (RR: 1.81), ⩾ 3 adenomas (RR: 1.64), size ⩾ 10mm (RR: 1.66), and age ⩾ 60 years (RR: 1.65). The presence of villous adenomas, high grade dysplasia, proximal adenomas, and male gender were associated with less profound increases in RR. Marked variation in study design and substantial heterogeneity between studies was observed. Conclusions: Convincing evidence exists that patients with advanced adenomas, ⩾ 3 adenomas, adenomas ⩾ 10 mm, or age ⩾ 60 years have an increased risk of adenoma recurrence. The evidence for other baseline findings for an increased risk of adenoma recurrence is inconclusive. Marked variation and consistently lower RRs in studies of medium or low quality emphasize the necessity for well performed and well reported studies. Given the high impact of surveillance on patients and service providers, there is need for further assessment of the risk(s) of adenoma recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims: In patients with primary esophageal cancer, luminal patency can be restored by placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The use of SEMS in patients with dysphagia caused by malignant extrinsic compression has largely been unreported. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of SEMS in a large cohort of patients with malignant extrinsic compression. Patients and methods: This was a prospective single-center study. Between 1995 and 2009, 50 consecutive patients with malignant extrinsic compression who had undergone SEMS placement were included (mean age 64 years; 37-males). In the majority of patients, extrinsic esophageal compression was caused by obstructive pulmonary cancer (n = 23) and by mediastinal metastasis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (n = 16). Results: Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Severe complications occurred in 5 / 50 patients (10 %) including perforation during dilation prior to stent insertion (n = 2) and hemorrhage (n = 3). Two patients (4 %) died from bleeding. Mild complications were seen in 9 / 50 patients (18 %). Recurrent dysphagia occurred in eight patients (16 %) and was successfully managed by subsequent endoscopic intervention. Median survival after stent placement was 44 days (range 5 days – 2 years). The median stent patency of 46 days in this series exceeded median patient survival. Conclusions: Insertion of an SEMS is an effective palliative treatment for patients with dysphagia due to malignant extrinsic compression. In spite of the short survival, some patients present with recurrent dysphagia, which can be managed effectively by endoscopic re-intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 58-year-old man presented with persistent gastrointestinal bleeding caused by lesions in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. It states that the patient had been using rabeprazole for gastroesophageal reflux disease since 2007. Moreover, it says that additional tests including a positive secretin stimulation test, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound revealed a gastrinoma.

Population-based screening for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precursor lesions, using evidence-based methods, can be effective in populations with a significant burden of the disease provided the services are of high quality. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project co-financed by the European Union. The 450-page guidelines were published in book format by the European Commission in 2010.  They include 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, individually graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. Adoption of the recommendations can improve and maintain the quality and effectiveness of an entire screening process, including identification and invitation of the target population, diagnosis and management of the disease and appropriate surveillance in people with detected lesions. To make the principles, recommendations and standards in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community and to facilitate their use in the scientific literature, the original content is presented in journal format in an open-access Supplement of Endoscopy. The editors have prepared the present overview to inform readers of the comprehensive scope and content of the guidelines.

Background and Study Aims: Colonoscopy is increasingly performed by nurse endoscopists. We aimed to assess the endoscopic quality and patient experience of these procedures., Patients and Methods: This prospective multicenter study analyzed 100 consecutive colonoscopies each for 10 trained nurse endoscopists with respect to endoscopic quality and patient experience. Colonoscopies were performed under the supervision of a gastroenterologist, using the techniques and protocols of the participating hospitals. Patient experience was assessed using a questionnaire., Results: Most nurse endoscopists were female (90 %; median age 43 [range 35 - 49]). Before the start of the study, they had performed a median of 528 colonoscopies (range 208 - 2103). For the 1000 patients, mean age was 56 ± 15 years; 55 % were women; and 96 % were in class I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system. Colonoscopies were performed for screening or surveillance in 42 %; for symptomatic indications in 58 % of patients. The unassisted cecal intubation rate was 94 %; the mean withdrawal time was 10 ± 5 minutes. The adenoma detection rate was 26.7 %. In 229 of the colonoscopies (23 %), the nurse endoscopists required assistance from the supervising gastroenterologist. The complication rate was 0.2 %: one perforation and one cardiopulmonary complication. The questionnaire was completed by 734 /1000 patients (73 %) and of these 694 /734 (95 %) were satisfied with the endoscopic procedure. Among the respondents 530 /734 (72 %) had no specific preference for a physician or nurse endoscopist, whereas 113 /734 (15 %) preferred a physician endoscopist, and 91 /734 (12 %) preferred a nurse endoscopist., Conclusion: The nurse endoscopists performed colonoscopies according to the internationally recognized quality standards and with high patient satisfaction., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) has emerged as a viable alternative for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J) in patients who cannot tolerate gastric feeding. Reportedly, DPEJ placement with regular endoscopes fails in up to one-third of cases. The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE)-assisted DPEJ. The DPEJ placement technique was comparable to conventional PEG placement. A total of 12 DPEJ procedures were performed in 11 patients (mean age 55 years [range 24-83 years]; seven males). SBE-assisted DPEJ was successful in 11 of the 12 procedures (92%). Post-procedural complications included gastroparesis and aspiration pneumonia in one case each. We conclude that SBE-assisted DPEJ placement seems a safe and successful approach for patients requiring jejunal enteral feeding., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Study Aim: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has proven to be a relatively safe method for small-bowel evaluation, with a complication rate of 1 %. The main concern after diagnostic DBE is acute pancreatitis. Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) has emerged as a viable alternative to DBE. Until now, no incidence of pancreatitis has been reported for SBE. The aims were to evaluate complication rate and occurrence of hyperamylasemia and to identify the risk factors for hyperamylasemia after SBE., Patients and Methods: Prospectively, consecutive patients undergoing peroral ("proximal") or combined approach SBE were included. Complications were assessed at 1 and 30 days afterwards. Serum amylase and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed immediately before and 2 - 3 hours after SBE., Results: 166 SBE procedures were performed in 105 patients (53-male; mean age 51 years, range 9 - 87). The indications for SBE were: anemia (n = 55), Crohn's disease (n = 31) and abdominal complaints suspicious for inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (n = 1) and other (n = 13). Therapeutic interventions were performed during 21 procedures (13 %). One perforation (1 / 21 therapeutic interventions, 4.8 %) occurred after dilation of a benign stricture. While 13 patients (16 %) had post-SBE hyperamylasemia, none had complaints suggesting acute pancreatitis. Factors such as sex, indication, procedure duration, number of passes, route of SBE, findings, and/or treatment showed no significant correlation with presence of hyperamylasemia., Conclusions: SBE appears to be a safe diagnostic endoscopic procedure. The incidence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis after peroral SBE seems comparable to that after DBE., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.)

Background and Aim: Perforation of the colon as a result of endoscopic manipulation is considered a severe adverse event. The goal of this review is to present the expected incidence of perforation in relation to varying levels of difficulty in endoscopic exploration and polypectomy together with the whole context of mechanisms, predisposing factors, diagnosis, and the strategic management plan., Methods: An extensive search was undertaken in the Medline database for recent articles (published from 2000 onwards) in the English language using specific terms relating to the reported frequency of perforation during diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in various medical settings and including morbidity, mortality, and appropriate management. Additional articles were retrieved irrespective of publication date to supplement where necessary data on important issues such as mechanisms of perforation, risk factors, diagnosis, and prevention., Results: The frequency of perforation was found to be 1 in 1400 for overall colonoscopies and 1 in 1000 for therapeutic colonoscopies. Varying perforation rates have been estimated for polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resections, and endoscopic submucosal dissections. The mortality has dropped to 0 % in most studies, with the highest reported percentage being 0.02 %. Advanced age, female sex, the presence of multiple co-morbidities, diverticulosis, and bowel obstruction have been shown to increase the risk of perforation. The decision between surgery and nonoperative treatment will depend on the type of injury, the quality of bowel preparation, the underlying colonic pathology, and the clinical stability of the patient., Conclusion: The perforation rate has declined in recent years in relation to more historical series, but there is now an increasing trend as a consequence of advanced interventional endoscopy. Awareness and experience are the only preventive measures that can limit the incidence of perforation., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.)

Background and Study Aim: Duodenal polyposis occurs in approximately 90 % of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and 5 % - 10 % develop duodenal cancer. Novel imaging techniques may improve evaluation of duodenal polyposis using the Spigelman classification. We aimed to analyze the value of high resolution endoscopy (HRE) and the additional value of chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of duodenal polyposis in FAP., Patients and Methods: 43 FAP patients scheduled for surveillance endoscopy in two academic centers underwent gastroduodenoscopy with HRE forward- and side-viewing devices. After number and size of adenomas had been scored, indigo carmine 0.5 % was sprayed onto the mucosa, polyps were scored again and biopsies taken from the larger lesions. Subsequently, Spigelman classifications were assessed for pre- and post-staining., Results: Before staining, a median of 16 adenomas per patient were detected compared with 21 adenomas after staining ( P = 0.02). Staining led to upgrading of Spigelman stage in 5/43 patients (12 %). Using the side-viewing endoscope, ampullary enlargement was detected in 22 patients (51 %) of whom 18 (42 %) had histologically confirmed ampullary adenomas., Conclusion: HRE has raised the quality of endoscopic imaging considerably. Consequently, re-evaluation of the original Spigelman classification system seems advisable. Chromoendoscopy further increases detection of duodenal adenomas in FAP but without considerable change in Spigelman stage. Ampullary adenomas are commonly found in FAP and are best visualized using a side-viewing endoscope. Therefore, a combination of forward-viewing HRE and chromoendoscopy with side-viewing endoscopy for the periampullary region seems useful for surveillance of duodenal adenomatosis in FAP.

Background and Study Aim: Reported complications of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) include post-enteroscopy pancreatitis. Hyperamylasemia after proximal DBE is reported frequently, but the relationship to development of pancreatitis remains unclear. Hyperamylasemia may be related to balloon inflation in the pancreatic head region. The aims of the study were to identify risk factors for hyperamylasemia and to determine the incidence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis when a modified cautious DBE insertion protocol was used., Patients and Methods: In a prospective study, involving consecutive patients undergoing a proximal DBE, serum amylase activity was assessed immediately before and after the procedure., Results: 135 patients were included (men 78, women 57; mean age 49 years [range 17 - 88]). The mean total procedure time was 73 minutes (range 30 - 150 minutes), and mean number of passes during the proximal DBE was 14 (6 - 24). While patients (17 %) developed hyperamylasemia after the DBE procedure, only one patient with hyperamylasemia had clinical symptoms indicating a mild acute pancreatitis (0.7 %). Total procedure time and number of passes correlated significantly with the occurrence of hyperamylasemia., Conclusions: We found a low incidence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis post-DBE. Theoretically, this could result from the modified insertion technique, with local strain and friction of the small bowel as remaining causes of hyperamylasemia, a notion supported by the significant relation between hyperamylasemia and duration of DBE and total number of passes. We therefore advise use of the cautious insertion technique and, if possible, reduction of duration and of number of passes in every proximal DBE.

Background and Study Aims: Gastrointestinal endoscopy investigations are frequently requested by gastroenterologists, general practitioners and other physicians. In addition to the classic methods of report writing, several electronic endoscopic report systems are currently available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the costs of three different ways of producing reports; by hand, by dictation, or by computer., Methods: Three methods of report writing were compared, with special attention to costs. The endoscopy process was analyzed, from arrival of the patient to sending the report to the referring doctor, and including production of endoscopic images or video, logging of used endoscopes and their disinfection, and storage costs for endoscopy data., Results: During the first 5 years, the mean costs per procedure were Euro 4.78 for handwritten, Euro 6.39 for dictated and Euro 8.90 for computerized reports. Due to depreciation, after this initial period, the respective costs declined to Euro 4.37, Euro 5.20 and Euro 5.13, respectively. Despite high initial costs, a cost-benefit analysis already revealed a financial benefit from a computerized system after 3 years., Conclusions: The electronic production of an endoscopic report turned out to be the most expensive way of report writing during the first 5 years, due to high initial costs. After 5 years the costs of the different systems were comparable with each other. Cost-benefit analysis showed a positive financial benefit for computerized reports after 3 years.

Background and Study Aims: Simulators are increasingly used in skills training for physicians; however data on systematic evaluation of the performance of these simulators are scarce compared with those used in aviation. The objectives of this study were to determine the expert validity, the construct validity, and the training value of the novel Olympus simulator as judged by experts., Patients and Methods: Participants were novices and experts. Novices had no prior experience in flexible endoscopy; experts had all performed more than 1000 colonoscopies. Participants filled out a questionnaire on their impression of the realism of the colonoscopy exercises performed. These included a dexterity exercise and a virtual colonoscopy. Test parameters used were points acquired in a game, time to reach the cecum, maximum insertion force, and "patient pain.", Results: Novices (n = 26) scored a median of 973 points (range--118-1393), experts (n = 23) scored 1212 points (range 89-1375). This difference did not reach significance (P = 0.073). Experts performed virtual colonoscopy significantly faster than novices (220 vs. 780 s, P < 0.001) but used more insertion force (11.8 vs. 11.6 N; P = 0.147). Maximum pain score was higher in the expert group: 86% vs. 73%. (P = 0.018). The realism was graded 6.5 on a 10-point scale. Experts considered the Olympus simulator beneficial for the training of novice endoscopists., Conclusions: The novel Olympus simulator discriminates excellently between the measured levels of expertise. The prototype offers a good realistic representation of colonoscopy according to experts. Although the software development is continuing, the device can already be implemented in the training program of novice endoscopists.

Background and Study Aim: Visualization of the small bowel by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is frequently impaired by intestinal contents. Different bowel preparations have been studied with controversial results. The aim of this study was to determine a satisfactory and tolerable bowel preparation for VCE., Methods: Ninety patients were randomized to three preparation regimens. Group A underwent VCE after clear liquid diet and overnight fast, while groups B and C received respectively 1 or 2 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution before VCE. For each VCE five segments of 10 minutes were selected, one at the start of each quartile of the small-intestinal transit time, the fifth being the last 10 minutes of the ileum transit. Mucosal visibility was regarded as good if more than 75 % of the mucosa could be evaluated. All patients answered a questionnaire regarding procedure tolerability., Results: The use of PEG solution led to a significant improvement in mucosal visualization. Mucosal visibility was good in the terminal ileum in 25 % of patients in group A, 52 % in group B, and 72 % in group C. The diagnostic yield did not change significantly. The use of 2 L of PEG solution was considered more uncomfortable than no PEG solution or 1 L of the same., Conclusion: One liter of PEG solution improves mucosal visualization without causing discomfort for the patient.

Background and Study Aims: In patients with presumed Barrett esophagus we evaluated clinical risk factors that could predict the presence of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in biopsies of columnar-lined esophagus (CLE), independently of histological results., Patients and Methods: In 908 patients with CLE of length > or = 2 cm, data on age, sex, reflux symptoms, tobacco and alcohol use, medication use, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were prospectively collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and a model for predicting the histological results was developed., Results: In 127/908 patients, biopsies of CLE did not contain intestinal metaplasia. Of the 781 patients with intestinal metaplasia, 663 patients (85%) had no dysplasia, and 118 (15%) had low grade dysplasia (LGD). The most important predictors for the presence of intestinal metaplasia were length of CLE, size of hiatal hernia, and male sex, while among those with intestinal metaplasia, age and male sex were most important for the presence of LGD. Multivariate combinations of these predictors yielded reliable models, which were able to discriminate intestinal metaplasia well from no intestinal metaplasia (area under receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.82), but only reasonably discriminated LGD from no dysplasia (area under ROC 0.65)., Conclusions: A simple model based on clinical findings can be used to predict the presence of intestinal metaplasia in biopsies from CLE. In contrast, predicting the presence of LGD versus no dysplasia in intestinal metaplasia is more difficult. Predictions from these models may aid decision making on whether a patient with CLE should have surveillance, in view of the known sampling error at endoscopy and interobserver variability at histology.

Background and Study Aim: An overestimation of the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) results in rectal cancer staging has been reported recently, which was found to be caused by the selective reporting of more positive results. In this study, we assessed whether publication bias was also present in the reporting of EUS staging results in upper gastrointestinal cancer., Methods: A Medline literature search was performed. English-language articles containing information on the accuracy of EUS for T staging and/or N staging of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer were included. Articles published in abstract form only, case reports, and reviews were excluded. Studies reporting EUS results of patients who had undergone preoperative radiation and/or chemotherapy were also excluded. EUS results were plotted against numbers of patients, year of publication, journal type, and journal impact factor., Results: The plots of the numbers of patients against accuracies for T stage and N stage and the statistical analyses showed no evidence of publication bias with regard to upper gastrointestinal cancer. The reported accuracy of EUS for the T stage of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer declined slightly over the years, but this was statistically significant only in the case of esophageal cancer (P = 0.01). No statistically significant correlations were found for N staging for any of the three types of cancer. In addition, no correlations were found between EUS results and journal type or journal impact factor., Conclusion: No evidence was found for the selective reporting of more positive EUS results for esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer staging, which suggests that publication bias was not present.