Search

Harvesting daylight for improving building energy performance has become an important issue in recent years. Most energy simulation tools use a Daylight Factor (DF) based algorithm to capture the complexity of daylight behaviors. However, DF has a limitation for fully accounting realistic daylight conditions, and several modifications or integrations with other supporting tools were developed to compensate for this limitation. This paper uses the Kriging method to predict daylight conditions for a whole year, and couples this method with energy simulation tools. Kriging is a group of geo-statistical techniques used to interpolate the value of a random field at an unobserved location from discrete observed values at nearby locations. In previous research, the Kriging method showed promising outcomes; that result was significantly better than current daylight modeling in energy simulation tool, and very close to the results from advanced physics-based daylight simulation tool. However, Kriging also comes with certain limitations that require further investigation. One major hurdle was Kriging’s long computational time compared to current daylight models in energy simulation tools. For this reason, this paper aims to find possibilities to reduce computational time to realistic levels that can be applicable in practice. Furthermore, it proposes a method to integrate Kriging-based daylight model with an energy simulation tool that can plot hourly indoor light distribution. This proposal obtains more realistic results than current energy simulation daylight models, while reducing computational expense. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper the authors present an algorithm that abstracts an arbitrarily shaped set of building volumes into a group of simplified ‘shoebox’ building energy models. It is shown that for generic perimeter and core floorplans the algorithm provides a faster but comparably accurate simulation results of annual load profiles vis-à-vis multi-zone thermal models generated according to ASHRAE90.1 Appendix G guidelines. Envisioned applications range from rapid thermal model generation for urban building energy modelling to schematic architectural design. Following a description of the algorithm, its ability to produce load profiles for a mixed-use neighborhood of 121 fully conditioned buildings for a variety of climates is demonstrated. The comparison yields relative mean square errors in simulated annual building energy use intensity of five to 10 percent compared to ASHRAE 90.1 compliant building energy models while reducing simulation times by a factor of 296. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]