Search

[Display omitted] • Simulation of residential building energy supply with heat pump or hydrogen systems. • 2050: Hydrogen economically-viable if H 2 -/Elec.-price is less than 34–61 % per kWh. • For conservative price predictions: Electric heat pumps are most economical solution. • Energy carrier switch for single-family houses: H 2 -/Elec.-price below 44 % per kWh. • Energy carrier switch for multi-family houses: H 2 -/Elec.-price below 58 % per kWh. • Fuel cells are emerging as an economically-viable option for multi-family houses. Fossil-fueled heating in the building sector is responsible for 16 % of Germany's total CO 2 emissions. Options for the climate-neutral heating of buildings include renewable electricity or renewable hydrogen. In this paper, we conduct a bottom-up study to investigate the role of hydrogen in the climate-neutral energy supply of ten selected residential buildings in comparison to electricity-based systems. Based on a demand simulation and linear optimization of the supply system, sensitivity analyses identify the threshold values of the hydrogen price for the use of hydrogen technologies (hydrogen boilers or fuel cells) in building energy systems and make the quantities of hydrogen consumed visible. The results specify the first installations of hydrogen-operated fuel cells in multi-family houses if the hydrogen price reaches 0.17 €/kWh H2 in 2050 at an electricity price of 0.31 €/kWh el. Generally, for different building types and electricity supply prices, it indicates that the use of hydrogen becomes economically-viable if the price of hydrogen supply is in the range of 34–61 % of the price of the electricity supply per kWh and below. For the case of green hydrogen obtained using renewable electricity, it is highly questionable whether hydrogen supply will be that much cheaper than direct electricity supply, making its economical use in buildings uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]