Search

The low energy efficiency of the European building stock is both a social and environmental issue. However, plans and studies on energy retrofitting interventions do not usually evaluate the impact of these measures on households' energy affordability. This paper analyses and compares the effect of alternative retrofitting strategies on thermal energy services' affordability in Spanish vulnerable households. This analysis was carried out by applying the Required Thermal Energy Expenditure model proposed in previous studies to several 2030 residential building stock scenarios, setting 2020 as a baseline. Therefore, this work proposes a methodological approach to assess the impact of the considered energy efficiency interventions on energy poverty in winter (WEP) and summer (SEP) and carries out both a 'social cost' and a cost-benefit analysis. The dwelling's thermal-enclosure retrofitting stands out as a very WEP-reduction and social-cost effective measure. Instead, replacing old thermal systems with more efficient ones would have a higher impact on SEP. Combining both kinds of retrofitting measures could reduce heating and cooling required expenditures by, respectively, 49% and 59%, and decrease the WEP and SEP share, correspondingly, by 35% and 63%. These results might inform policymakers to enhance the targeting and design of energy efficiency programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Cost-effective and sustainable energy systems retrofit for buildings. • 2nd life Li-Ion batteries in polygeneration systems for buildings. • To cut off the natural gas consumption at affordable cost. The building sector represents around one-third of the energy related to the EU CO 2 eq emissions, which makes it a crucial sector for achieving the EU's energy and environmental goals. Thus, the EU has established a legislative framework to foster, among others, the modernisation of the existing building stock through a better energy system integration. In this sense, bearing in mind the needs of energy system retrofit of the public buildings in Spain, this paper carried out a thorough analysis of different trade-off solutions obtained from the multiobjective optimization of a polygeneration system for the TR5 building of the Polytechnic University of Catalunya. The results highlight the selection of PV panels, cogeneration modules and 2 nd life Li-Ion batteries, among others, to achieve cost-effective and sustainable energy systems. By covering the available area, 2000 m 2 , the PV panels attend about 23% of the electricity required for the building. On the other hand, considering the current geopolitical tensions, it presents a potential configuration that allows to cut off the natural gas consumption reducing about 6% the current cost. The study was carried out by using a Mixed Integer Linear Programming model maximizing the Net Present Value of the project considering the environmental impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Building stock modelling is implemented through a bottom-up method. • Dynamic simulations are applied through calibrated and parameterized stock models. • Optimal retrofit solutions under a 2050 future weather scenario are proposed. • Results are provided for four different climatic regions in southern Spain. • Results can be interactively accessed by stakeholders and the general public. Retrofitting the existing building stock is widely accepted as a crucial factor to reaching 2030 and 2050 climate and energy targets, given that the building sector is among the top three most dominant energy consumers. This paper presents a bottom-up study which uses calibrated and parameterized energy stock models (building archetypes), while also incorporating building stock information from a large database. The thermal performance of the existing social housing stock of southern Spain is assessed through dynamic simulation under present and future climate change scenarios. Subsequently, several passive and low-cost operation-related strategies are numerically optimized through genetic algorithms to determine the best retrofit solutions, taking into consideration global warming scenarios. A multi-objective decision analysis is carried out by optimizing annual overheating hours (%), annual undercooling hours (%), and investment costs (€/m2). Among the conclusions reported, it is important to note the feasibility of implementing low-cost retrofit strategies considering investment costs of up to around 200 €/m2, which would lead to average annual overheating and undercooling hours below 55 % and 45 %, respectively. However, retrofit solutions exclusively based on passive and low-cost operation measures were proven to be significantly limited to improve thermal comfort results in the social stock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A systematic literature-approach to classify retrofitting is proposed. • An overview of Spain's previous guidelines on residential retrofits is presented. • A review of financial and subsidies mechanisms in Spain to renovate buildings is introduced. • A literature-based matrix on retrofitting actions is presented. • A classification of energy efficiency strategies for retrofitting is proposed. The building sector is responsible for more than 40% of final energy consumption in Europe; consequently, retrofitting existing buildings can significantly contribute to mitigate greenhouse emissions. Nevertheless, although the European Union has introduced relevant policy instruments, up to now the annual retrofit rates are considerably low with an average of 0.2% at European level. Understanding the past would support the success of the new strategies, such as the recent ones launched through the New Green Deal, which reinforces the importance of renovating existing buildings stock, as the main aim of the renovation wave. As a starting point for assessing the main challenges to allocate the Recovery funds, this paper provides a review of Spain's relevant literature to clearly define the characterization of the existing building stock, which actions have been typically considered under the scope of retrofits, and which strategies have been implemented until now, considering both, private and public initiatives and public financial schemes. The present work has a strong focus on energy-related strategies, although other interrelated actions are mentioned, such as accessibility measures and interior refurbishment of dwellings. Differences and similarities within these approaches are presented through the analysis of 27 relevant references of retrofitting actions and 52 references of financial mechanisms. As in Spain 93% of multifamily buildings were constructed prior to the national transposition of the first Energy Performance Building Directive (EPBD), and therefore are in need of deep energy renovations, the retrofitting of multifamily buildings topic has been widely addressed, even though often in a disjointed manner. The study suggests that although historically there have been several recommended strategies, few are conceived as integral actions, only 15% of the intervention packages refer passive and active energy-related measures and renewable energy incorporation. Furthermore, considering the antiquity of the building stock and the advantage of addressing the topic through clusters, only 63% of the resources directly refer these actions to specific clusters among the six distinctive periods, although in most cases focusing their recommendations on buildings constructed before 1980 where the worst energy performance buildings are concentrated. Concerning public financial and funding instruments, the research illustrates that there has been a substantial increment of programs over the last years promoting energy-related measures, renewable energy and other complementary aspects such as accessibility and interior renovations, mainly for older clusters. Nevertheless, the funds constitute only 8% of the necessary declared investments, which along with the dispersion between the different procedures and the complexity of the processes, have significantly reduced the global impact of these actions without generating robust and oriented market dynamics. Despite the several resources found, both financial instruments and guidelines tend to describe in more detail strategies related to heating demand and consumption and not delve into other relevant actions for warmer climates, fact associated both to the dynamics coming from other countries, and to a vision of the past in which people do not consume refrigeration. This clear focus on heating loads rather than cooling could present limitations for warmer regions in the near climate-change future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]