Search

Historic buildings constitute a large amount of the European building stock and their preservation is of paramount importance for cultural, economic and also environmental reasons, as their conservation is regarded as more sustainable with respect to demolition and reconstruction. However, historic buildings require frequent repair and conservation works, whose environmental impact is still to be evaluated. In the present paper the sustainability of conservation intervention is evaluated by the LCA analysis method, focusing in particular on cleaning materials and technologies, with reference to conservation sites located in Bologna, Italy. After identifying the most used cleaning materials and technologies, the time necessary for achieving an equal cleaning effectiveness was selected as functional unit and the LCA analysis was carried out, along with a quantitative evaluation of some other key aspects of the different methods (workers’ health, acoustic impact and waste produced in the building site). The results highlight that the different technologies involve remarkably different environmental impacts, but that in some cases their impact could be easily reduced by substituting some secondary materials in the cleaning process, without affecting the effectiveness of cleaning. The results also show that the methods involving the lowest environmental impact are not necessarily the best ones in terms of safety and waste production in the building site. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-residential buildings like healthcare ones contribute to energy consumption and cause a negative environmental impact. This is mainly due to the age of the buildings, their poor level of energy efficiency and the implementation of only a basic maintenance plan. Owing to the very limited budget available for public administrators, Energy Performance Contracting (EPC), that entails the involvement of an Energy Service Company (ESCo), can provide the entire or part of the capital needed for investments aimed at progressively increasing energy efficiency over their service life. In this paper, three acute hospitals and two community clinics built in Italy are analysed, in order to assess the economic feasibility of several energy renovation actions that can be included within EPC contracts. To this purpose, the outcomes of energy audits carried out in 2014 about these buildings are reported, which involved analyses of consumption measured over the previous three years and assessment of use profiles for the development of models to break down the overall consumption and to estimate potential savings. Diverse improvement strategies were assessed, consisting in either isolated or combined renovation actions and tested on the five buildings, whose comparison was carried out in terms of energy saving, pollution reduction and economic feasibility. As a result, the best combined renovation actions per each hospital were recommended, that included – but were not limited to – the improvement of the control and regulation of existing sub-systems without replacement, partial replacement of other sub-systems and integration of renewables. Finally, each scenario was evaluated through the payback period and other economic performance indexes in order to assess the feasibility of the EPC framework when applied to this case study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The energy policy in Europe regarding buildings and the energy efficiency sector are regulated by two directives: 2002/91/CE – EPBD and 2006/32/CE – EEESD . The CEN has elaborated a standard to revise all European normatives about building energy performance and HVAC plants. The “CEN Umbrella” CEN/TR 15615 includes a new version of EN ISO 13790:2008 and a new standard about heating plant, use and contributions of renewable energy sources. Furthermore, the CEN Standard provides a software version for technicians. In this paper we present a Round Robin Test between a selection of softwares applied to an Italian case study. The selected calculation methodologies, range from research packages to extra-simplified software. Furthermore, the Italian procedure described in UNI TS 11300 has been analyzed and considered as the reference for all other calculation methodologies. The results of the Round Robin Test show the relationship between thoroughness of data input and energy evaluation accurancy. The more the input data is affected by uncertainty, the less precise is the energy efficiency calculation. On the other hand the energy performance of building evaluation accurancy depends on the aim of the simulation: the energy audit, the energy design or the energy labeling (certification). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]