Search

Among the various factors that affect building performance, occupant behavior (OB) has received more and more attention and has become a research hotspot in building design and operation in recent years. However, due to the remarkable randomness and diversity of OB in buildings, it is difficult to accurately describe its characteristics using a fixed schedule, which is a normal approach of most energy simulation tools. DeST, a whole building energy simulation tool offers the function of stochastic OB simulation so that the simulation results can be more in line with the actual situation. In the newly released DeST 3.0, the OB modules are developed based on the actual observed OB data and are divided into two parts: occupancy and occupant action modules. The occupancy module is based on the Markov chain, which simulates the occupant movements among the spaces inside and outside the buildings. The occupant action modules are proposed with an environment and event-driven stochastic infrastructure based on a three-parameter Weibull distribution, such as occupant shading, window, and air-conditioning (AC)/heating control behavior modules. This paper presents the OB modules development for coupled simulation in DeST 3.0 and discusses the effects of integrated simulation of occupant behavior on building energy consumption. Firstly, an overview of the current modelling efforts of OB is given, from the trend to the existing foundation. Secondly, the development of OB modules for coupled simulation in DeST 3.0 is introduced in-depth, including co-simulation of AC/heating control behavior, window behavior and shading behavior. Lastly, two case studies that realize coupled simulation using the developed modules are shown, one is the comparison between existing occupancy schedules from GB standards and the developed occupancy simulation, and the other is the comparison between the result of simulating with or without using AC/heating control behavior modules in two bedrooms of the residential building. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally, in building energy modeling (BEM) programs, occupant behavior (OB) inputs are deterministic and less indicative of real world scenarios, contributing to discrepancies between simulated and actual energy use in buildings. This paper presents a new OB modeling tool, with an occupant behavior functional mock-up unit (obFMU) that enables co-simulation with BEM programs implementing functional mock-up interface (FMI). The components detailed in the development of the obFMU include an overview of the DNAS (drivers-needs-actions-systems) ontology and the occupant behavior eXtensible Markup Language (obXML) schema, in addition to details on the creation of the obFMU that contains the co-simulation interface, the data model and solvers. To demonstrate functionality of the tool, three examples of occupant behaviors were simulated, including: (1) turning on and off lights, (2) opening and closing windows, and (3) turning on and off the air conditioners. The obFMU can be used via co-simulation with all building simulation programs that implement the FMI, thus users are not limited to a particular tool. Another advantage is the use of obXML schema to represent occupant behavior, standardize the description of occupant behavior enabling information exchange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper introduces a Human and Building Interaction Toolkit (HABIT) for simulating the thermally adaptive behaviors and comfort of office occupants alongside building energy consumption. The toolkit uses the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB) to co-simulate a field-tested, agent-based behavior model with an EnergyPlus medium office model. The usefulness of the toolkit is demonstrated through a series of zone and building-level case study simulations that examine the wisdom of pairing local heating and cooling options with strategic thermostat set point offsets, judging from the energy, Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), and cost perspectives. Results generally suggest that trading efficient local heating/cooling options for whole space conditioning has both energy and comfort benefits, saving up to 28% of monthly HVAC energy while improving the acceptability of thermal conditions in a Philadelphia climate. Nevertheless, cost analysis shows that the fuel source of conserved energy must be considered – particularly in the case of personal heater use, which adds to electric plug loads and associated utility and CO 2 emissions cost penalties. Moreover, costs from even small changes in simulated occupant productivity tend to overwhelm energy costs, suggesting the need to improve the accuracy and precision of available productivity models across multiple seasons and climates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]