1. Characterizing model errors due to flow-pressure formulation and zero-flow pressure correction in building pressurization tests in steady windy anisothermal conditions.
- Author
-
Carrié, François Rémi, Olson, Collin, and Nelson, Gary
- Subjects
- *
BUILDING envelopes , *WIND pressure , *WIND speed , *AERODYNAMICS of buildings , *AIR flow , *TEST methods , *SENSITIVITY analysis - Abstract
• This paper quantifies model errors in fan pressurization tests in windy anisothermal conditions. • Maximum error is characterized with fan-induced, weather-induced, and reference pressures. • Both the power-law and the quadratic law can yield significant errors at low pressures. • Possibilities for testing in windy anisothermal conditions are extended compared to ISO 9972. Building pressurization test methods assume that the flow through building envelopes follows a power law or a quadratic law with a specific correction to account for wind and stack effects. This paper investigates the model error stemming from these assumptions using a numerical approach. The model developed calculates the air flow rate through a building envelope assuming it can be viewed as an array of parallel cracks following a quadratic law. On the one hand, the model gives the ideal leakage air flow rate at a given reference pressure across all leaks; on the other hand, it calculates the leakage air flow rate at the same reference pressure that would be obtained with a pressurization test. In calm isothermal conditions, sensitivity analyses show the error in the leakage air flow rate is in the range of –32% to 0% and −15% to 25% at 4 Pa for the quadratic and the power laws, respectively; it is in the range of 0% to 1.5% and −1% to 0.7% at 50 Pa. In windy anisothermal conditions, the range of the relative error strongly depends on the constraints put on the induced pressures. In our analyses, ISO 9972 constraints disqualify a significant number of tests without reducing the maximum error. The results obtained on a very large number of tests enabled us to derive a simple relationship between the maximum error on the leakage air flow rate, the fan-induced pressure, the weather-induced pressure, and the reference pressure. This relationship could be used for estimating uncertainties in pressurization tests for a given building in given weather conditions without invalidating tests a priori based on criteria such as the zero-flow pressure or the wind speed. The discussion details the model limitations. Note in particular that it applies only to steady weather conditions. Further research is necessary to consider unsteady conditions which are common in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF