Search

The global best (gbest) or local best (lbest) of every particle in state-of-the-art multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) implementations is selected from the non-dominated solutions in the external archive. This approach emphasizes the elitism at the expense of diversity when the size of the current set of non-dominated solutions in the external archive is small. This article proposes that the gbests or lbests should be chosen from the top fronts in a non-domination sorted external archive of reasonably large size. In addition, a novel two local bests (lbest) based MOPSO (2LB-MOPSO) version is proposed to focus the search around small regions in the parameter space in the vicinity of the best existing fronts unlike the current MOPSO variants in which the pbest and gbest (or lbest) of a particle can be located far apart in the parameter space thereby potentially resulting in a chaotic search behaviour. Comparative evaluation using 19 multi-objectives test problems and 11 state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms ranks overall the 2LB-MOPSO as the best while two state-of-the-art MOPSO algorithms are ranked the worst with respect to other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a local-best harmony search algorithm with dynamic subpopulations (DLHS) for solving the bound-constrained continuous optimization problems. Unlike existing harmony search algorithms, the DLHS algorithm divides the whole harmony memory (HM) into many small-sized sub-HMs and the evolution is performed in each sub-HM independently. To maintain the diversity of the population and to improve the accuracy of the final solution, information exchange among the sub-HMs is achieved by using a periodic regrouping schedule. Furthermore, a novel harmony improvisation scheme is employed to benefit from good information captured in the local best harmony vector. In addition, an adaptive strategy is developed to adjust the parameters to suit the particular problems or the particular phases of search process. Extensive computational simulations and comparisons are carried out by employing a set of 16 benchmark problems from the literature. The computational results show that, overall, the proposed DLHS algorithm is more effective or at least competitive in finding near-optimal solutions compared with state-of-the-art harmony search variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]