Search

Despite the widespread international trend toward decentralization, local municipalities in Greece still rely heavily on fiscally centralized revenue sources, thereby achieving a limited extent of tax or other forms of fiscal autonomy. This paper seeks to explain the determinants of local government fiscal autonomy in Greece over the 1999–2009 year period. By constructing a dataset with disaggregated revenue and expenditure subcategories for the first tier of local government and by applying panel data analysis techniques, it offers unique evidence that socioeconomic and demographic criteria along with political factors affect the level of fiscal autonomy of local government in the country. Our evidence also highlights the distinctive nature of Greece in geographical terms, reporting significant differences across diverse geographical regions (such as islands or mountainous areas). The paper aims at filling in part the gap in the existing research for Greece and at offering some insights from a fiscally centralized country to the current international debate on intracountry fiscal decentralization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rural development has, in recent years, become a major area of EU policy, to the extent that the term has even begun to be overused in signifying a new shift in EU rural policy. The result has been a great deal of misunderstanding and numerous divergent interpretations of both the concept and the practice. Although rural development existed as a policy domain before the arrival of the accentuated 'Second Pillar' of the reformed Common Agricultural Policy, the fact is that an increasingly Europeanized approach to rural development funding, programming, and administration has developed in the post-1999 period. In this paper we argue that the study of rural development policy will gain a great deal from using a policy network approach to interpret the dynamics of evolving rural development policy within member states. Our main aim is to analyze and interpret the newly emerging Rural Development Policy Network in Greece, which aspires to separate itself from a strong and resistant Agricultural Policy Network. The example of Greece suits the purpose of the paper not only because of Greece's continuing reliance on agriculture and the centrality of the latter in sustaining rural livelihoods, but most importantly due to the institutional arrangements developed around it, which are characterized by a prevalence of agricultural interests at the expense of wider rural concerns. The concern of this paper is with the mechanisms of transition, and to a lesser extent with its outcome. One major finding is that the policy network approach to the study of rural development policy in Greece brings to light a certain transformation in policy structures, mechanisms, and administration. This transformation is not so evident at the level of policy style and/or policy outcome. Due to it having been labeled a 'laggard' member state, Greece has been affected by the Europeanization of rural development policy and has to some extent transformed its policymaking procedures accordingly. At the same time, the process of Europeanization has acted to empower civil society mechanisms and actors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The spatial concentration of socioeconomic disadvantage as a result of discriminatory practices presents a challenging scenario for policy intervention. In this paper I examine the European Union (EU) social exclusion approach in addressing socioeconomic disadvantage in deprived urban areas, I look at the Greek city of Komotini, a society fragmented along ethnic lines. I focus on the Turkish minority community and explore the creation of local governance structures aiming at tackling exclusion through enhanced participation in decision making. The concept of citizenship rights that guided local `exclusion' policies exposes the differences in the de jure and the de facto rights of different groups in the city. The governance mode of participation, however, puts emphasis on coordination and consensus at the expense of local realities. EU participatory principles that take local networking dynamics for granted do not travel well in centralized governance frameworks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]