1. Biomonitoring Human Exposure to Household Air Pollution and Association with Self-reported Health Symptoms – A Stove Intervention Study in Peru.
- Author
-
Li, Zheng, Commodore, Adwoa, Hartinger, Stella, Lewin, Michael, Sjödin, Andreas, Pittman, Erin, Trinidad, Debra, Hubbard, Kendra, Lanata, Claudio F., Gil, Ana I., Mäusezahl, Daniel, and Naeher, Luke P.
- Subjects
- *
BIOMASS stoves , *AIR pollution , *BIOLOGICAL monitoring , *POLYCYCLIC aromatic hydrocarbons , *PSYCHOLOGY ,ENVIRONMENTAL aspects - Abstract
Background Household air pollution (HAP) from indoor biomass stoves contains harmful pollutants, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and is a leading risk factor for global disease burden. We used biomonitoring to assess HAP exposure and association with self-reported symptoms in 334 non-smoking Peruvian women to evaluate the efficacy of a stove intervention program. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study within the framework of a community randomized control trial. Using urinary PAH metabolites (OH-PAHs) as the exposure biomarkers, we investigated whether the intervention group ( n = 155, with new chimney-equipped stoves) were less exposed to HAP compared to the control group ( n = 179, with mostly open-fire stoves). We also estimated associations between the exposure biomarkers, risk factors, and self-reported health symptoms, such as recent eye conditions, respiratory conditions, and headache. Results We observed reduced headache and ocular symptoms in the intervention group than the control group. Urinary 2-naphthol, a suggested biomarker for inhalation PAH exposure, was significantly lower in the intervention group (GM with 95% CI: 13.4 [12.3, 14.6] μg/g creatinine) compared to control group (16.5 [15.0, 18.0] μg/g creatinine). Stove type and/or 2-naphthol was associated with a number of self-reported symptoms, such as red eye (adjusted OR with 95% CI: 3.80 [1.32, 10.9]) in the past 48 h. Conclusions Even with the improved stoves, the biomarker concentrations in this study far exceeded those of the general populations and were higher than a no-observed-genotoxic-effect-level, indicating high exposure and a potential for increased cancer risk in the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF