Search

Purpose: Determine the optimal initial monotherapy for children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) based on 12 months of double-blind therapy., Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial compared the efficacy, tolerability, and neuropsychological effects of ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed CAE. Study medications were titrated to clinical response, and subjects remained in the trial unless they reached a treatment failure criterion. Maximal target doses were ethosuximide 60 mg/kg/day or 2,000 mg/day, valproic acid 60 mg/kg/day or 3,000 mg/day, and lamotrigine 12 mg/kg/day or 600 mg/day. Original primary outcome was at 16-20 weeks and included a video-electroencephalography (EEG) assessment. For this report, the main effectiveness outcome was the freedom from failure rate 12 months after randomization and included a video-EEG assessment; differential drug effects were determined by pairwise comparisons. The main cognitive outcome was the percentage of subjects experiencing attentional dysfunction at the month 12 visit., Key Findings: A total of 453 children were enrolled and randomized; 7 were deemed ineligible and 446 subjects comprised the overall efficacy cohort. There were no demographic differences between the three cohorts. By 12 months after starting therapy, only 37% of all enrolled subjects were free from treatment failure on their first medication. At the month 12 visit, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar (45% and 44%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]with valproic acid vs. ethosuximide 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.52; p = 0.82) and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine (21%; OR with ethosuximide vs. lamotrigine 3.08; 95% CI 1.81-5.33; OR with valproic acid vs. lamotrigine 2.88; 95% CI 1.68-5.02; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The frequency of treatment failures due to lack of seizure control (p < 0.001) and intolerable adverse events (p < 0.037) was significantly different among the treatment groups. Almost two thirds of the 125 subjects with treatment failure due to lack of seizure control were in the lamotrigine cohort. The largest subgroup (42%) of the 115 subjects discontinuing due to adverse events was in the valproic acid group. The previously reported higher rate of attentional dysfunction seen at 16-20 weeks in the valproic acid group compared with the ethosuximide or lamotrigine groups persisted at 12 months (p < 0.01)., Significance: As initial monotherapy, the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and valproic acid compared to lamotrigine in controlling seizures without intolerable adverse events noted at 16-20 weeks persisted at 12 months. The valproic acid cohort experienced a higher rate of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation as well as significant negative effects on attentional measures that were not seen in the ethosuximide cohort. These 12-month outcome data coupled with the study's prespecified decision-making algorithm indicate that ethosuximide is the optimal initial empirical monotherapy for CAE. This is the first randomized controlled trial meeting International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria for class I evidence for CAE (or for any type of generalized seizure in adults or children). (NCT00088452.)., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2012 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Purpose: Despite possibility of idiosyncratic reaction development, felbamate (FBM) is recommended in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and partial refractory epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the profile of interactions between FBM and four conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ESM), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA), in pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions in mice, a model of myoclonic seizures in humans., Methods: Data obtained from PTZ-evoked seizures were compared by use of two basic procedures, the subthreshold method and isobolographic analysis. Results of the chimney test (evaluating motor coordination) also were elaborated isobolographically. Thus it was possible to determine both median toxic dose (TD50) and protective index (PI) for each drug combination., Results: FBM reduced the clonic seizure activity [with an ED50 of 9.7 mg/kg; TD50, 439.1 mg/kg; and PI, 45.3]. FBM at the dose of 10 mg/kg, but not 7.5 mg/kg, significantly reduced PTZ-induced convulsions in mice. In the subthreshold method, FBM (7.5 mg/kg) did not affect the protective activity of conventional AEDs used in the study. However, when applied at 10 mg/kg, it enhanced the protective activity of PB and ESM, but not that of VPA or CZP. The nature of these interactions could not be precisely estimated with this method. The exact profile of drug interactions was determined with the use of isobolography. In terms of seizure inhibition, antagonism was found between FBM and VPA applied at the fixed-dose ratio of 3:1. Synergy was detected between FBM and PB (1:3). Combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3, 1:1), PB (1:1, 3:1), and ESM or CZP (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) led to additive interactions. As regards motor impairment, the combinations of FBM with VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) were synergistic. Remaining combinations exhibited pure additivity. Pharmacokinetic events may influence FBM/ESM and FBM/CZP interactions, because FBM lowered the brain concentration of ESM and increased that of CZP., Conclusions: The profitable benefit index was found only for the combination of FBM with PB (1:3). Conversely, the combinations of FBM with either VPA (1:3) or CZP (1:1, 3:1) do not seem promising for the therapy of refractory myoclonic convulsions. Isobolographic analysis provides more reliable clues to be considered by the clinicians willing to introduce AED combinations for the therapy of epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are administered to patients for acute and long-term treatment of seizures. Most patients with acute convulsions receive intravenous (i.v.) benzodiazepine (BZD), frequently followed by i.v. loading with phenytoin (PHT), especially when seizures continue. For patients with absence status epilepticus, BZD is usually followed by ethosuximide (ESM) or valproate (VPA). The decision to continue AED therapy is based on the likelihood that seizures will continue or recur. Once epilepsy is diagnosed, long-term treatment with AEDs is recommended, beginning with monotherapy. Two studies sponsored by the U.S. Veterans Administration (VA), which compared the efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ), PHT, phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), and VPA, recommend that most adults with recurrent partial seizures receive either CBZ or PHT. The 1992 VA study suggests that VPA is equal to CBZ or PHT in efficacy when partial seizures become secondarily generalized. Primary generalized epilepsies are most frequently treated with VPA when combinations of generalized seizures exist. ESM is prescribed most often when typical childhood absence seizures exist alone. Although many authorities do not recommend long-term treatment of childhood febrile seizures, PB is administered by some when febrile seizures have complex symptomatology. In general, AED monotherapy is currently preferred, but those with more refractory epilepsy receive polytherapy. CBZ, PHT, PB, PRM, VPA, and ESM are the primary AEDs prescribed in the United States. PHT, followed by CBZ and VPA, is the most frequently prescribed AED as both new and total prescriptions. The introduction of felbamate, gabapentin,and lamotrigine may alter these patterns in the future.

Optimal management of allergic rash from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is unclear. We identified 50 patients with 68 reactions (36 to one AED, 10 to two AEDs, and four to three AEDs). The AEDs implicated were carbamazepine, 30; phenobarbital (PB), 20; phenytoin, 16; ethosuximide, one; and AED combination, one. Sixty-three reactions were cutaneous eruptions, three exfoliative dermatitis, and two Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Forty-six reactions were mild (rash only), 18 moderate (systemic symptoms or other organ system involvement), and four life-threatening (all with PB). In most patients with greater than 1 reaction, the second and third reactions were not more severe than the first. Prior antibiotic allergies or nonmedication allergies were no more common than in a control group without reactions. The AED was ceased abruptly in 59 patients (22 of whom did not receive a new AED), tapered in five, and continued unchanged in four. Despite this, there was no status epilepticus (SE) during the reaction or its treatment, and no patient's seizure control deteriorated. In 40 cases, a new AED was added--16 after the reaction had resolved and 24 before total resolution. Rash recurred with the new AED in 50 and 42% respectively (NS). We conclude that, though allergic rashes to AEDs are usually mild, the rare occurrence of severe reactions indicates that the AED should be ceased. This can be done abruptly with minimal risk of SE. A new AED can be added, if necessary, prior to the resolution of the rash without increasing the risk of further reactions.

Rare, serious adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) include hepatotoxicity and bone marrow suppression. Current management includes routine laboratory monitoring during therapy with AEDs, a practice, however, that is controversial, as some clinicians believe that such monitoring is ineffective and that clinical monitoring is sufficient. Unfortunately, routine laboratory monitoring cannot predict acute idiosyncratic drug reactions, which will remain unpreventable until specific markers are available to identify susceptible patients. Nevertheless, routine laboratory monitoring may be helpful for early detection of chronic adverse reactions such as subclinical hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia, which are usually mild and clinically insignificant but are occasionally more severe. Routine liver function tests may be especially important during valproate therapy because pathologic data suggest that some cases of valproate (VPA)-induced hepatic failure are the result of chronic liver damage and cirrhosis. Although levels of hepatic enzymes may be elevated during an early reversible stage of VPA toxicity, by the time clinical symptoms develop, hepatic failure may be irreversible.