Search

Abstract Objective Cenobamate (CNB), a recently approved antiseizure medication by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), serves as an adjunctive therapy for focal‐onset seizures in adult patients unresponsive to at least two other treatments. Administered in polytherapy, CNB can potentially interact with co‐administered drugs in epilepsy patients, necessitating dose adjustments and the need for effective therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods In this study, we introduce a novel LC–MS/MS method for precise CNB quantification using Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS), following validation according to ICH guidelines M10. VAMS samples are efficiently extracted with 200 μL of methanol, with chromatographic separation achieved using an Acquity UPLC HSS PFP column. The method's efficacy was confirmed through its application to real samples from adult CNB‐treated patients. Results Our results demonstrate that the method exhibits linearity within the range of 0.05–30 mg/L, with intra‐ and inter‐run precision ranging from 1% to 8% and accuracy from 1% to 10% based on 30 μL of sample. Furthermore, CNB stability in VAMS is confirmed for up to 15 days at 25°C and −20°C. Importantly, no significant difference was observed between CNB concentrations in VAMS samples and those in plasma obtained from venous blood. Significance This VAMS‐based LC–MS/MS method presents a robust alternative for TDM in CNB‐treated patients. Future investigations should explore CNB concentrations in capillary blood and assess their correlation with plasma levels to further enhance its clinical utility. Plain Language Summary Cenobamate is an antiepileptic drug and used for treatment of focal‐onset seizures in adult patients (≥18 age). TDM can prevent drug interactions and minimize drug toxicity. The aim of this work is to evaluate volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) from capillary blood as an alternative strategy for TDM in patients treated with the newly antiepileptic drug. Our method is suitable for TDM, and this study suggests that VAMS allows monitoring of cenobamate concentration and can offer valuable support for personalized therapy in refractory epilepsy.

Abstract Objective Rare and complex epilepsies encompass a diverse range of disorders characterized by seizures. We aimed to establish a consensus on key issues related to these conditions through collaboration among experienced neurologists, neuropediatricians, and patient advocacy representatives. Methods Employing a modified Delphi method, a scientific board comprising 20 physicians and 4 patient advocacy representatives synthesized existing literature with their expertise to formulate statements on contentious topics. A final 32‐member expert panel, representing diverse regions of Italy, validated these statements through a two‐round voting process, with consensus defined as an average score ≥7. Results Sixteen statements reached a consensus, emphasizing the necessity for epidemiological studies to ascertain the true prevalence of rare epilepsies. Etiology emerged as a crucial factor influencing therapeutic strategies and outcome prediction, with particular concern regarding prolonged and tonic–clonic seizures. The importance of early implementation of specific drugs and non‐pharmacological interventions in the treatment algorithm for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) was underscored. Multidisciplinary care involving experts with diverse skills was deemed essential, emphasizing non‐seizure outcomes in adolescence and adulthood. Significance This national consensus underscores the imperative for personalized, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary management of rare epilepsies/DEEs. It advocates for increased research, particularly in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches, to inform clinical decision‐making and healthcare policies, ultimately enhancing patients' outcomes. Plain Language Summary The modified Delphi method is broadly used to evaluate debated topics. In this work, we sought the consensus on integrated and social care in epilepsy management. Both representatives of high‐level epilepsy centers and patients' caregivers were directly involved.

Abstract Myoclonus classically presents as a brief (10–50 ms duration), non‐rhythmic jerk movement. The etiology could vary considerably ranging from self‐limited to chronic or even progressive disorders, the latter falling into encephalopathic pictures that need a prompt diagnosis. Beyond the etiological classification, others evaluate myoclonus' body distribution (i.e., clinical classification) or the location of the generator (i.e., neurophysiological classification); particularly, knowing the anatomical source of myoclonus gives inputs on the observable clinical patterns, such as EMG bursts duration or EEG correlate, and guides the therapeutic choices. Among all the chronic disorders, myoclonus often presents itself as a manifestation of epilepsy. In this context, myoclonus has many facets. Myoclonus occurs as one, or the only, seizure manifestation while it can also present as a peculiar type of movement disorder; moreover, its electroclinical features within specific genetically determined epileptic syndromes have seldom been investigated. In this review, following a meeting of recognized experts, we provide an up‐to‐date overview of the neurophysiology and nosology surrounding myoclonus. Through the dedicated exploration of epileptic syndromes, coupled with pragmatic guidance, we aim to furnish clinicians and researchers alike with practical advice for heightened diagnostic management and refined treatment strategies. Plain Language Summary In this work, we described myoclonus, a movement characterized by brief, shock‐like jerks. Myoclonus could be present in different diseases and its correct diagnosis helps treatment.

Abstract Response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) can be influenced by several gene polymorphisms, causing either lower efficacy or higher occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We investigated the clinical utility of salivary pharmacogenomic testing on epilepsy patients. A commercialized pharmacogenomic salivary test was performed in a cohort of epileptic patients. Genetic variants on five genes (i.e., CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, EPHX1, and ABCB1) involved in common ASMs metabolism were selected. Twenty‐one individuals (median age [Q1–Q3]: 15 [6.5–28] years) were enrolled. Six patients harboring the homozygous *1F allele in CYP1A2 could have reduced chance of response to stiripentol due to fast metabolism. CYP2C9 had reduced activity in 10 patients (alleles *2 and *3), potentially affecting phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), primidone, lacosamide (LCM), and valproic acid metabolism. Seven patients, carrying the *2 allele of CYP2C19, had an increased risk of ADRs with clobazam (CLB), PB, PHT, LCM, brivaracetam; while one individual with the *17 allele in heterozygosity reported a CLB fast metabolism. Six patients showed a CC polymorphism of EPHX1 associated with the impaired efficacy of carbamazepine. ABCB1 polymorphisms related to drug‐resistance (3435 CC) or drug‐sensitive phenotype (CT or TT) were found in 6 out of 7 patients. Pharmacogenomic testing on saliva proved easy and safe in clinical practice to convey information for the management of epileptic patients, especially those resistant to treatment or sensitive to severe ADRs.