Search

Background. Craniosynostosis repair via open complex cranial vault remodeling (OCCVR) is a complicated surgical procedure associated with morbidity and blood loss, often requiring blood transfusion. The Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative group created the Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry (PCSPR) to capture data relating to the perioperative management of children undergoing craniofacial surgery. A tertiary pediatric hospital implemented its own quality improvement (QI) initiative with the aim of reducing blood transfusion volumes and exposures in patients undergoing OCCVR. The initiative included preoperative iron supplementation, intraoperative use of cell saver and tranexamic acid, maintenance of normothermia, and restrictive transfusion protocols. Methods. Patients were included in the study if they had a diagnosis of craniosynostosis, were younger than 18 years, and underwent OCCVR. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were recorded using the PCSPR. Outcomes included blood transfusion volume, number of blood donor exposures, and intra and postoperative complications. Outcomes before and after the initiative were compared. Results. The median perioperative allogenic blood transfusion volume decreased from 35 mL/kg pre-QI to 24 mL/kg post-QI (P < .001). There was a significant decrease in the number of blood donor exposures, and the number of patients who experienced a transfusion-free perioperative period increased from 10.9% to 19.6% (P = .037). There were no observed differences in perioperative complications, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, or mortality. Conclusions. This QI initiative has resulted in reduced blood transfusion volumes and reduced blood donor exposures without an increase in perioperative complications related to blood loss. Further multi-institutional research is necessary to create national standards for the anesthetic care of all patients undergoing OCVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The development of postoperative oronasal fistulae (ONF) is a complication that plagues all cleft surgeons to varying degrees. There is extensive literature discussing the incidence, functional impact, and treatment of ONF. The goal of this article is to provide an extensive review of the literature discussing the incidence, causative factors, functional impact, classification systems, and treatment of ONF. Methods. A literature review was performed using PubMed using the Medical Subject Heading terms "cleft palate" AND "fistula" OR "palatal fistula" OR "oronasal fistula". After review, a total of 356 articles were deemed relevant for this study. Results. Information regarding ONF care, prevention, and management in patients with cleft palate was collected from the articles included in this review. Treatment of ONF remains a challenging problem as there is not a consensus in the available literature on the best palatoplasty techniques for their prevention and treatment. A myriad of reconstructive options and adjunctive therapies exist, and their use is guided by the size and location of the fistula. Conclusions. Fistula treatment should be tailored to the specific needs of the patient, and consideration must be given to not only the ONF itself but also the patient's stage of growth and development. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed in which ONF are described using standardized nomenclature, and improved outcomes reporting is necessary to better define an algorithm for a truly holistic approach to palate surgery and reduce the incidence of palatal fistula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Dorsal augmentation is one of the more complication-prone procedures in rhinoplasty, demanding ample skill and experience to produce an aesthetic and functional result. Numerous autologous grafts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials have been attempted for augmentation with varying success. Each graft material has its own unique properties that require varying surgical intricacies. The relative risks and benefits of these strategies and materials are also variable and must be weighed. Alloplastic implants are commonly used in eastern countries, but, due to different patient populations and complication profiles, have found less acceptance among western surgeons. Methods. A PubMed search was done using the terms "dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty," "liquid rhinoplasty," and "grafts used for rhinoplasty." Publication dates ranging from 1957-2022 were included. Abstracts were screened for relevance, and references from each article were reviewed to identify further articles. Chapters on dorsal augmentation from two key rhinoplasty textbooks were also reviewed. Results. A total of 81 articles and 2 textbooks were formally screened; of these, 70 resources were included. Findings were grouped under the headings "facial analysis," "ethnic factors in graft selection," "graft characteristics," "septal cartilage," "auricular cartilage," "costal cartilage," "diced cartilage grafts," "bone grafts," "soft tissue grafts," "nonsurgical/liquid rhinoplasty," and "alloplastic implants." Conclusions. Current dorsal augmentation literature focuses on retrospective studies and expert experiences. There are limited quantitative and prospective studies present to delineate an ideal graft. With consistently advancing technology and knowledge of facial aesthetics, a surgeon must maintain a thorough understanding of the current graft and implant options to offer a specialized treatment plan for each deformity and patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]