Search

Background Significant progress in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) has substantially extended the life expectancy of patients with CF (pwCF). Consequently, the population of adult pwCF has outnumbered paediatric patients in most developed countries. Ageing is a new factor that can contribute to disease complexity and can require adaptation of CF units. Therefore, the necessity for standardised, specialised and multidisciplinary care is imperative. Concerns arise regarding the adequacy of current healthcare, therapeutic and educational offerings. Methods To address these concerns, a multinational survey was conducted to assess the current state of care in specialised multidisciplinary adult and paediatric CF units and identify areas for improvement. Responses were collected from 44 centres providing regular care to CF patients. Results The survey unveiled considerable disparities in the availability of critical resources, including diagnostic access, supplementary testing, treatment modalities, transplant and transition programmes, and healthcare professionals’ training. Conclusion This study underscores the urgent need to standardise care across these centres in order to minimise disparities in terms of available resources and training with a particular emphasis on adult pwCF who are becoming more numerous and showing different needs with ageing. The changing landscape of CF in adulthood will require constant monitoring to ensure proper adaptation of the current model of care.

Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) has proven to be useful in the evaluation of lung involvement in COVID-19. However, its effectiveness for predicting the risk of severe disease is still up for debate. The aim of the study was to establish the prognostic accuracy of serial LUS examinations in the prediction of clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Methods Prospective single-centre cohort study of patients hospitalised for COVID-19. The study protocol consisted of a LUS examination within 24 h from admission and a follow-up examination on day 3 of hospitalisation. Lung involvement was evaluated by a 14-area LUS score. The primary end-point was the ability of LUS to predict clinical deterioration defined as need for intensive respiratory support with high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation. Results 200 patients were included and 35 (17.5%) of them reached the primary end-point and were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). The LUS score at admission had been significantly higher in the ICU group than in the non-ICU group (22 (interquartile range (IQR) 20–26) versus 12 (IQR 8–15)). A LUS score at admission ≥17 was shown to be the best cut-off point to discriminate patients at risk of deterioration (area under the curve (AUC) 0.95). The absence of progression in LUS score on day 3 significantly increased the prediction accuracy by ruling out deterioration with a negative predictive value of 99.29%. Conclusion Serial LUS is a reliable tool in predicting the risk of respiratory deterioration in patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 pneumonia. LUS could be further implemented in the future for risk stratification of viral pneumonia.