Search

Estuaries contain vital habitats and it is important to understand how these areas respond to human activities and natural processes such as sea-level rise and wave attack. As estuarine shorelines erode or become modified with hard structures, there is potential for significantly altering the availability of sediment and the filling of coastal systems. This study used a source-to-sink approach and quantified rates of shoreline erosion in the Tar-Pamlico sub-estuary, a tributary of the larger Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine System (APES). The average shoreline change rate (SCR) determined using an end-point method was −0.5 ± 0.9 m yr −1 for the Tar-Pamlico. Incorporating bulk density estimates, this contributes 0.6 × 10 5 tons of fine sediment to the system annually, or after accounting for fluvial input, about 40% of the total sediment supply to the sub-estuary. The role of the Tar-Pamlico as a sink for these sediments was addressed using the radionuclide tracers 210 Pb and 137 Cs. Radionuclide activities and sediment accumulation rates identified several depositional regions, in particular in the middle of the estuary. Linear sediment accumulation rates ranged from 0.10 ± 0.02 to 0.38 ± 0.02 g cm −2 yr −1 , and total storage of fine sediment in the system was 1.6 × 10 5 t yr −1 . It was not possible to confidently discern a change in the rate of shoreline erosion or seabed accumulation. A preliminary budget for fine sediments (grain-size <63 μm) was then calculated to compare erosional sources with sedimentary sinks. Almost all (∼93.0%) of the fine sediment entering the system was accumulated and stored, while only about 7.0% was exported to Pamlico Sound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seabed erosion is a vital process for sediment transport in estuaries and coasts. In this study, we investigated the seabed erosion process and its spatiotemporal variability in the Pearl River Estuary, China, via in-situ observations and laboratory experiments. It is found that the seabed was more erodible in the channel than at the shoal in most cases due to the difference in sediment size. In a neap-spring-neap tidal cycle, a laminated seabed with different sediment ages was inferred to form due to deposition on flood tides and erosion on ebb tides. The seabed was more erodible during spring tides than neap tides because of the difference in sediment availability at the unconsolidated fresh layer. Furthermore, the erosion curve showed evident flood-ebb asymmetry, which was found to be related to the variations of sediment availability and bottom stress. Besides, erosion experiments with different sediment consolidations revealed that sediment erodibility decreased with the growth of consolidation. This study promotes our understanding on the spatiotemporal variability of sediment erodibility, and has significant implications for simulation and prediction of estuarine sediment transport and morphological evolution. • The seabed was found more resistant to erode with the growth of sediment age. • The flood-ebb asymmetry in erodibility in the Pearl River Estuary was noted. • Seabed experiencing frequent erosion-deposition processes was prevented from further consolidation and became more erodible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]