Search

Aims: To systematic review and meta-analyse the association and mechanistic links between atrial fibrillation (AF) and cognitive impairment., Methods and Results: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to 27 March 2021 and yielded 4534 citations. After exclusions, 61 were analysed; 15 and 6 studies reported on the association of AF and cognitive impairment in the general population and post-stroke cohorts, respectively. Thirty-six studies reported on the neuro-pathological changes in patients with AF; of those, 13 reported on silent cerebral infarction (SCI) and 11 reported on cerebral microbleeds (CMB). Atrial fibrillation was associated with 39% increased risk of cognitive impairment in the general population [n = 15: 2 822 974 patients; hazard ratio = 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.53, I2 = 90.3%; follow-up 3.8-25 years]. In the post-stroke cohort, AF was associated with a 2.70-fold increased risk of cognitive impairment [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.70; 95% CI 1.66-3.74, I2 = 0.0%; follow-up 0.25-3.78 years]. Atrial fibrillation was associated with cerebral small vessel disease, such as white matter hyperintensities and CMB (n = 8: 3698 patients; OR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.11-1.73, I2 = 0.0%), SCI (n = 13: 6188 patients; OR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.58-2.64, I2 = 0%), and decreased cerebral perfusion and cerebral volume even in the absence of clinical stroke., Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased risk of cognitive impairment. The association with cerebral small vessel disease and cerebral atrophy secondary to cardioembolism and cerebral hypoperfusion may suggest a plausible link in the absence of clinical stroke. PROSPERO CRD42018109185., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D.L. reports having served on the advisory board of Liva Nova and Medtronic. The University of Adelaide reports receiving on behalf of Dr Linz reports lecture and/or consulting fees from LivaNova, Medtronic, Pfizer, and ResMed. The University of Adelaide reports receiving on behalf of Dr Linz research funding from Sanofi, ResMed, and Medtronic. The University of Adelaide reports receiving on behalf of Dr Lau lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotronik, and Pfizer. The University of Adelaide reports receiving on behalf of Dr Mahajan lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Medtronic, Bayer, and Pfizer. The University of Adelaide reports receiving on behalf of Dr Mahajan research funding from Abbott and Medtronic. All the remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: There is growing evidence that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning in patients with non-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can be performed safely. Here, we aim to assess the safety of MRI in patients with non-conditional CIEDs., Methods and Results: English scientific literature was searched using PubMed/Embase/CINAHL with keywords of 'magnetic resonance imaging', 'pacemaker', 'implantable defibrillator', and 'cardiac resynchronization therapy'. Studies assessing outcomes of adverse events or significant changes in CIED parameters after MRI scanning in patients with non-conditional CIEDs were included. References were excluded if the MRI conditionality of the CIEDs was undisclosed; number of patients enrolled was <10; or studies were case reports/series. About 35 cohort studies with a total of 5625 patients and 7196 MRI scans (0.5-3 T) in non-conditional CIEDs were included. The overall incidence of lead failure, electrical reset, arrhythmia, inappropriate pacing and symptoms related to pocket heating, or torque ranged between 0% and 1.43%. Increase in pacing lead threshold >0.5 V and impedance >50Ω was seen in 1.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.8%] and 4.8% (95% CI 3.3-6.4%) respectively. The incidence of reduction in P- and R-wave sensing by >50% was 1.5% (95% CI 0.6-2.9%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0.06-1.1%), respectively. Battery voltage reduction of >0.04 V was reported in 2.2% (95% CI 0.2-6.1%)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis affirms the safety of MR imaging in non-conditional CIEDs with no death or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks and extremely low incidence of lead or device-related complications., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Several techniques have been utilized for the ablation of persistent (P) and long-standing persistent (LsP) atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the best approach of substrate ablation remains poorly defined. This study aims to examine the impact of ablation approach on outcomes associated with P or LsP AF ablation by conducting a meta-analysis and regression on contemporary literature., Methods and Results: A systematic literature review was conducted up to 29 July 2015 for scientific literature reporting on outcomes associated with P or LsP AF ablation. One hundred and thirteen studies reported outcomes in a total of 18 657 patients undergoing various ablation approaches for the treatment of P-LsP AF between 2001 and 2015. The point efficacy estimate of a single-AF ablation procedure without the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs was 43% (95% CI; 39-47%). Multiple procedures and/or the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs increase success to 69% (95% CI; 66-71%). Meta-regression revealed that ablation technique (P < 0.001) and left atrial size (P = 0.02) were predictive of single procedure, drug-free success. The addition of extra-pulmonary substrate approaches was associated with declining efficacy when compared to a pulmonary vein ablation alone., Conclusion: The efficacy of a single-AF ablation procedure for P or LsP AF is 43%; however, can be increased to 69% with the use of multiple procedures and/or anti-arrhythmic drugs. Current literature supports the finding that pulmonary vein antrum ablation/isolation is at least equivalently efficacious to other contemporary P-LsP ablation strategies.

Aims: Ideal positioning of left ventricular (LV) pacing lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is technically demanding. This case aims to place LV lead in anterolateral branch of coronary sinus (CS) using collateral route blindly., Methods and Results: Externalization via the CS ostium using collaterals retrogrogradely, which was not visible in initial balloon occlusion venography, through one delivery sheath with the support of commonly used micro-guide catheter and subsequent successful LV lead placement in anterolateral branch of CS., Conclusion: This innovative retrograde approach for LV pacing lead implantation in anterolateral branch of CS obviated the need for snare technique to capture the distal end of the wire when antegrade route was not successful., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)