Search

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly pathogenic coronavirus characterized by by systemic inflammatory response with endothelial damage and a dysregulated coagulation system. Despite most patients survive the acute setting of COVID-19, their long-term clinical sequelae are highly unclear. We have sought to identify the impact of post-COVID-19 syndrome on mid-term follow-up and gain some additional insights about the potential explanation for persistence of dyspnea. Methods This is a 3-month prospective cohort study of previously hospitalised COVID-19 patients recruited from a single Spanish center, a small outpatient group without prior hospitalisation was also evaluated. Patients underwent serial testing with cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET), transthoracic echocardiogram, pulmonary lung test, six-minute walking test, serum biomarker analysis and quality of life questionaries. They were classify according to the presence of persistent dyspnea. Primary study outcome was predicted peak oxygen consumption (V02) according to CPET and predicted carbon monoxide diffusion capacity. Results Our study included 41 (58.6%) patients with dyspnea and 29 (41.4%) asymptomatic. Symptomatic patients had a higher proportion of females (73.2% vs. 51.7%), but comparable age and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. We did not observe differences among the assessed variables in transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test. Patients who referred dyspnea had smaller predicted peak O2 consumption (77.8 [64–92.5] vs. 99 [88–105]: p Interpretation In this study >50% of COVID-19 survivors present a symptomatic functional impairment irrespective of age or prior hospitalization. Compared to asymptomatic patients, among those who referred dyspnea our findings suggest potential ventilatory inefficiency. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leόn; Grant from the Spanish Society of Cardiology Tabla de resultados

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) augments the likelihood of having left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) – precursor of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). LVDD shares overlapping symptomatology (cough and dyspnea) with COPD. Purpose Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of inflammatory, oxidative stress, cardio-pulmonary and echocardiographic parameters at rest for the diagnosis of stress LVDD in non-severe COPD patients, who complain of exertional dyspnea and are free of overt cardiovascular diseases. Methods A total of 104 COPD patients underwent echocardiography before cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and 1–2 minutes after peak exercise. Patients were divided into two groups based on peak E/e': patients with stress induced left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) - E/e' >15 (HFpEF) and patients LVDD (without HFpEF). CPET and echocardiographic parameters at rest were measured and their predictive value for stress E/e' was analysed. Markers for inflammation (resistin, prostaglandine E2) and oxidative stress (8-isoprostanes) were also determined. Results Stress induced LVDD occurred in 67/104 patients (64%). Those patients had lower work load, lower VO2 consumption, lower minute ventilation and higher VE/VCO2 slope in comparison to patients without. Except for prostglandine E2, none of the inflammatory, oxidative stress markers correlated to stress E/e'. The best independent predictors for HFpEF were RAVI, right ventricular parasternal diameter and RV E/A >0.75. Their combination predicted HFpEF with the accuracy of 91.2%. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of HFpEF in non-severe COPD with exertional dyspnea, free of overt cardiovascular disease. RAVI, right ventricular parasternal diameter and RV E/A >0.75 were the only independent clinical predictors of HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background Previous parameters such as peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope and OUES have been described to be prognostic in heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to identify further prognostic factors of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in HF patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of HF patients who underwent CPET from January to November 2019 in a single centre was performed. PETCO2 gradient was defined by the difference between final PETCO2 and baseline PETCO2. HF events were defined as decompensated HF requiring hospital admission or IV diuretics, or decompensated HF resulting in death. Results A total of 64 HF patients were assessed by CPET, HF events occurred in 8 (12.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. Patients having HF events had a negative PETCO2 gradient while patients not having events showed a positive PETCO2 gradient (−1.5 [IQR −4.8, 2.3] vs 3 [IQR 1, 5] mmHg; p=0.004). A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis revealed that PETCO2 gradient was an independent predictor of HF events (HR 0.74, 95% CI [0.61–0.89]; p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly higher incidence of HF events in patients having negative gradients, p=0.002 (figure 1). Conclusion PETCO2 gradient was demonstrated to be a prognostic parameter of CPET in HF patients in our study. Patients having negative gradients had worse outcomes by having more HF events. Time to first event, decompensated heart Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is recommended in the evaluation of selected patients with Heart Failure (HF). Notwithstanding, its prognostic significance has mainly been ascertained in those with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients with HF and LVEF Results Overall, 404 HF patients (mean age 57±11 years, 78.2% male, 55.4% ischemic HF) were included, of whom 321 (79.5%) had HFrEF and 83 (20.5%) HFmrEF. Compared to the former, those with HFmrEF had a significantly higher mean peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) (20.2±6.1 vs 16.1±5.0 mL/kg/min; p35 and EOV identified patients at higher risk for events (all p16.7 and >15.8 mL/kg/min more accurately identified patients at lower risk for the primary endpoint (NPV: 91.2 and 60.5% for HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively; both p Conclusions CPET is a useful tool in HFmrEF. Both pVO2 and EOV independently predicted the primary endpoint in HFmrEF and HFrEF, contrasting with VE/VCO2, which remained predictive only in latter group. Our findings strengthen the prognostic role of CPET in HF with either reduced or mid-range LVEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Purpose The aim of the present study was to test the correlation of the exercise lung ultrasound (LUS) and B-lines count with clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters among patients with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction and without signs of congestion reffered for cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for exertional dyspnea. Methods The study population consisted of 39 patients (age 63.0±9.3 years; 62% females) with preserved ejection fraction (≥50%) and without signs of congestion reffered for exercise testing. Pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease was ruled out. CPET, rest and stress echocardiography and B-lines count assessed by 8 zone LUS were performed. Results Exercise B-lines count was significantly higher than rest B-lines count (3.1±0.5 vs. 1.1±0.2; p Characteristics of study population Rest and peak exercise B-lines count Conclusion We observed weak but significant correlation between exercise B-lines count and left atrium diameter. However we didn't observe significant difference between HFpEF patients and rest of study population in B-lines count. Limitation of our observation is small study population.