Search

Background/Introduction Previous studies demonstrated that high platelet reactivity (HPR) predicts future cardiovascular death and coronary events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, few studies have focused on the impact of HPR on left ventricular remodeling (LVR) and each echocardiographic parameter. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of HPR in ACS patients on LVR and changes in echocardiographic volume indexes and LV ejection fraction. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in a single center that enrolled patients who underwent emergency PCI for ACS including STEMI and NSTEMI with prasugrel loading. The primary outcome of the study was LVR associated with HPR. Secondary endpoints were changes in indexed LVESV, LVEDV, LVEF, E/e' and LAVI between baseline and follow-up. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value in response to prasugrel was assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Blood samples were collected once per procedure immediately after PCI. LVR index was calculated as the relative change in LVEDV observed at follow-up compared with baseline. LVR was defined as a relative increase in LVEDV ≥20%, measured at follow-up visit compared with the baseline value before discharge. Results A total of 196 ACS patients who underwent emergency PCI between January 2016 and July 2020 were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the study population was 69.9 years, and 76.0% were male. On echocardiography at follow up visit of mean duration of 7.0±4.0 months, LVR was found in 38 patients (19.4%). The optimal cutoff for PRU associated with increased LVR assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was 245.5 (AUC: 0.656; 95% CI: 0.564 to 0.749; p=0.003). On the basis of this cutoff, HPR was found in 82 patients (42.1%) and the prevalence of LVR was significantly higher in the HPR group compared to the non-HPR group (30.5% vs. 11.4%; p=0.001). Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that HPR was an independent predictor of LVR (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.83–9.71, p=0.001). In addition, Δ% EDV and Δ% ESV increased in the HPR group, and decreased in the non-HPR group with significant differences (5.8±32.6% vs. −8.0±26.2% in Δ% EDV; p=0.002, 2.0±37.5% vs. −13.3±33.0% in Δ% ESV; p=0.004, respectively). Δ%EF, Δ%E/e', Δ%LAVI were numerically improved in the non-HPR group compared with the HPR group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion In patients with ACS, HPR defined as PRU ≥246 immediately after emergency PCI was an independent predictor of LVR in the chronic phase. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Predictors of the presence of LVRChanges (Δ%) of LVEDV and LVESV

Background The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a non-invasive measurement that evaluates arterial stiffness using the analysis of oscillometric waveform during cuff-Inflation. Several studies reported that CAVI is associated with cardiovascular risk factors, while the clinical prognostic value of CAVI as a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis has not been fully elucidated. Meanwhile, the Framingham risk score (FRS) is an established marker of cardiovascular outcomes. Purpose To investigate whether adding CAVI to Framingham risk score improves the prediction of cardiovascular events. Methods This prospective observational study included consecutive 422 patients with cardiovascular risk factors but without known coronary artery disease (69±8 years, 63% men). CAVI was measured by the oscillometric method with VaSera vascular screening system. Patients with atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction Results During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 12.8% (3.3%, 15.7%, and 19.1% in the low, intermediate and high-risk group of stratification by FRS, respectively). The ROC curve analysis for discriminating cardiovascular events showed that the AUC of CAVI added to Framingham risk score was the highest compared to Framingham risk score and CAVI alone (CAVI added to Framingham risk score: AUC 66.9, 95% CI 59.6–74.2, Framingham risk score alone: AUC 61.5, 95% CI 53.8–69.1, CAVI alone: AUC 62.3, 95% CI 54.1–70.6). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that CAVI and Framingham risk score were independent predictors of cardiovascular events (CAVI: OR 1.381, 95% CI 1.164–1.597, p=0.004, Framingham risk score: OR 1.135, 95% CI 1.044–1.225, p=0.007). Next, when logistic regression analysis was performed simultaneously on Framingham risk factor and CAVI, CAVI was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (OR 1.347, 95% CI 1.124–1.569, p=0.009). Furthermore, in the likelihood ratio test, CAVI added to Framingham risk score significantly improved the cardiovascular event prediction ability than Framingham risk factor alone. Next, when patients with intermediate risk (n=217) were divided into two groups based on CAVI of 9.0, the Kaplan-Meier estimate showed that events occurred more frequently in higher CAVI group (9.3% and 29.1%, log-rank, P=0.009) and the C-statistic was 0.662. Multiple Cox analysis showed that, in the intermediate risk group, CAVI was an independent predictor of primary outcomes (HR 1.387 per 1 index, 95% CI 1.081–1.779, p=0.010). Conclusion The measurement of CAVI could be a useful predictor for cardiovascular events. In addition, the combination of CAVI and Framingham risk score could improve the predictability compared to the Framingham risk score alone. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background/Introduction High platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with adverse cardiovascular events, primarily intrastent thrombosis, after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the relationship between hyperacute postprocedural HPR with prasugrel loading and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unclear. Moreover, factors contributing to HPR in ACS with prasugrel loading are also unknown. Purpose To assess the effects of post-procedural HPR with prasugrel loading on clinical outcomes in ACS during hospitalization, and to define the appropriate cut-off values and identify factors contributing to HPR. Methods A single-center, retrospective observational study that enrolled 154 patients who underwent emergent PCI for ACS with prasugrel loading was performed. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value was measured immediately after PCI using the VerifyNowR system. The primary end-point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia needing defibrillation). Results The mean patient age (standard deviation) was 70.7 (±12.5) years, 76.6% were men, and the average time from the prasugrel intake to PRU calculation was 103.2 (±48.5) min. During the mean hospital stay of 15.6 (±8.5) days, 24 in-hospital MACE (15.5%) and 8 deaths (5.2%) occurred. Thrombosis events, including myocardial infarction recurrence, did not occur (only one case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection was considered as myocardial infarction recurrence). PRU was significantly higher in the MACE group than that in Non-MACE group (287±55 and 232±64, respectively, p293) immediately after the emergent PCI. Kaplan-Meier curve showing MACE events occurred in the HPR group than that in the non-HPR group (40.5% vs 7.6%, p Conclusion PRU was significantly higher in the MACE group, with an appropriate cut-off value of HPR of 293 in this study. HPR was an independent predictor of MACE during hospitalization; however, thrombosis events were not significant. HPR predictors were old age, female sex, low systolic blood pressure, short prasugrel intake to measure time, and large acute gain. This study shows the post-procedural HPR with prasugrel loading in patients with ACS can be a useful predictive marker of adverse events during hospitalization. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background/Introduction Although high platelet reactivity (HPR) seems to be associated with adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the relationship between post-procedure HPR with prasugrel loading and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still unclear. Moreover, factors contributing to HPR in ACS with prasugrel loading are also unknown. Purpose This study aimed to assess the impact of post-procedure HPR with prasugrel loading on clinical outcomes in ACS during hospitalization, as well as to define appropriate cut-off values and identify factors contributing to HPR. Methods We performed a single-centre, retrospective observational study that enrolled 132 patients who underwent emergent PCI for ACS with prasugrel loading. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value was measured immediately after PCI with the VerifyNowR System. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia needing defibrillation). Results Mean patient age (standard deviation) was 70.7 (±12.5) years, 76% were male, and average time from prasugrel intake to PRU calculation was 101 (±48.8) min. During a mean hospital stay of 15.4 (±8.0) days, there were 22 (16%) MACE events and 6 (4%) deaths. The post-procedure PRU value was 241±66. HPR was significantly higher in MACE group than non-MACE group [287 (±55) vs 232 (±64), p293) immediately after emergent PCI. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed MACE events occurred more frequently in the HPR group than in the non-HPR group (42% vs 8%, log rank p3,000 U/L and HPR were independent predictors of MACE in patients with ACS who underwent PCI (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.86–13.26, p=0.001, and OR 7.52, 95% CI 2.73–20.7, p Conclusion HPR was significantly associated with adverse event during hospitalization in ACS patients. Female patients with large culprit lesion diameter were more likely to have HPR. Appropriate cut-off value of HPR in this study was 293. HPR in early-phase of ACS with prasugrel loading is a useful predictor of adverse events during hospitalization.