Search

Background Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients require anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Good versus suboptimal anticoagulation control expressed as high versus low time in target range (TTR) of international normalized ratio results in less clinical events in atrial fibrillation patients. However, data in CF-LVAD patients are lacking. Purpose To study the association between TTR and clinical events in patients with CF-LVAD as destination therapy. Methods Single-centre cohort study in patients receiving CF-LVAD between 2010–2021. Patients were followed from start of VKAs until outcome or end of follow-up. Outcomes were combined major adverse events, thromboembolisms, major bleedings, neurologic events and all-cause mortality. The TTR (low vs. high; 50%) was calculated during the overall study period and over 1-month periods by the Rosendaal-method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Cox regression with time-dependent covariables, adjusted for confounding. Results 74 patients were included; median age 63 years [interquartile range 58–68], 77% males and 60%ischemic heart failure. During 191 years follow-up, 39 combined major adverse events, 14 thromboembolisms, 21 major bleeding, 22 neurologic events and 38 deaths occurred. For 1-month periods, high TTR was associated with less combined major adverse events (HR 0.3 95% CI 0.2–0.7), major bleeding (HR 0.4 95% CI 0.2–1.1), thromboembolism (HR 0.3 95% CI 0.1–1.3) and death (HR 0.2 95% CI 0.1–0.5) (Table 1). Results considering the overall study period were similar. Conclusion Good anticoagulation compared with suboptimal control during 1-month and the overall study period in CF-LVAD patients with destination therapy is associated with lower rates of combined major adverse events, major bleedings, pump thrombosis and death. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure may be prevented by early detection of fluid retention. The multisensory HeartLogic™ algorithm, incorporated in a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) aims to detect impending fluid retention and thereby enables timely adjustment of medical therapy. However, it is to be investigated whether HeartLogic™ provides clinical benefit compared to heart failure care with conventional telemonitoring. This analysis investigates the effects of activating HeartLogic™ on top of heart failure care with telemonitoring on the number of episodes with fluid retention and heart failure related hospitalizations. Methods Heart failure patients with a CIED were recruited from the outpatient clinics of four European cardiology departments. All patients were included from January 2017 until December 2020, and followed-up for 365 days. Patients with a CIED and an activated HeartLogic™ algorithm were compared to a 1:1 propensity score-based matched control group consisting of patients with CIED on routine telemonitoring. Data of all episodes of (impending) fluid retention with ≥2 signs and symptoms of congestion were included for analyses. Results Data of 127 patients with an activated HeartLogic™ algorithm were adequately matched with 127 heart failure patients with a CIED on routine telemonitoring. Median age was 68 [59–75], majority of patients were male (80%), 46% had an ischemic etiology of heart failure. Total follow-up consisted of 254 patient years. During follow up, 77 (61%) individual patients with HeartLogic™ experienced an episode of fluid retention, compared to 85 (67%) induvial patients on routine telemonitoring. Patients with an activated HeartLogic™ algorithm had 1.62±1.78 events of fluid retention per patient year (PPY) compared to 2.61±3.71 events PPY in patients on routine telemonitoring, p Conclusion In a real-world multicenter heart failure population, activation of the HeartLogic™ algorithm was associated with a lower number of episodes of fluid retention per patient and a shorter duration of hospitalization for congestive heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.