Search

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to trigger a reversible dilated cardiomyopathy referred as arrhythmia-induced CM (AiCM). However, it remains unclear why some patients are more prone to develop AiCM than others and there is scarce information about their clinical outcomes after AF ablation. Purpose We ought to find clinical and analytical predictors for the development of AiCM and recovery of LVEF in patients referred for AF ablation. Methods A prospective multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation between September 2016 and November 2021 was conducted. The low voltage areas and left atrial (LA) volume were analyzed offline on high density electroanatomical maps collected prior to RF ablation. Peripheral blood sample for biomarker analysis (Gal-3, FABP4 and sRAGE) were obtained at the time of the procedure. Results 803 consecutive patients were included, median age was 61 and 240 (30,81%) were women. AF pattern was paroxysmal in 254 (32,60%) and persistent in 534 (68,55%; of whom, long-standing persistent in 113 (14,51%) patients). The median follow-up period was 23.83 months [IQR 9 to 36]. The multivariate analysis revealed LA area, width of QRS segment, persistent AF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) as independent predictors for AiCM. Recurrence-free survival was not different amog both cohorts (Figure 1). The median increase in LVEF from baseline to the 6-month follow-up visit in patients with AiCM was 16% (CI 14.31–18.47) without changes in the non-AiCM group. The median LVEF previously to CA from patients in the AiCM group was 38% (IQR 30–45%) and after the procedure 57% (IQR 50–60%) [see figure 2]. Conclusions AiCM is characterized to have a particularly complex pathophysiology not fully understood thus far. Pulmonary vein isolation in patients is safe and suitable for patients that suffered from tachycardiomyopathy. We found that persistent AF and chronic kidney disease play a key role in its development. Neither peripheral blood biomarkers nor left atrial samples showed relevant association with its occurrence. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Aims Since its emergence in early 2020, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reached pandemic levels, and there have been repeated outbreaks across the globe. The aim of this two-part series is to provide practical knowledge and guidance to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in association with COVID-19. Methods and results A narrative literature review of the available evidence has been performed, and the resulting information has been organized into two parts. The first, reported here, focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of cardiovascular (CV) conditions that may be manifest in patients with COVID-19. The second part, which will follow in a later edition of the journal, addresses the topics of care pathways, treatment, and follow-up of CV conditions in patients with COVID-19. Conclusion This comprehensive review is not a formal guideline but rather a document that provides a summary of current knowledge and guidance to practicing clinicians managing patients with CVD and COVID-19. The recommendations are mainly the result of observations and personal experience from healthcare providers. Therefore, the information provided here may be subject to change with increasing knowledge, evidence from prospective studies, and changes in the pandemic. Likewise, the guidance provided in the document should not interfere with recommendations provided by local and national healthcare authorities. [GRAPHICS] .

Introduction/Purpose Patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM1) have an increased risk of cardiac conduction disease and ventricular tachycardia associated with sudden cardiac death. Whilst this is well-established in adults, there is little published data on cardiac abnormalities in paediatric patients. To our knowledge this is the largest described cohort of children with DM1. The aim of this study is to better understand the prevalence and type of cardiac abnormalities in paediatric patients with DM1. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients referred to our paediatric quaternary institution between 31 December 2000 and 31 January 2019. The electronic patient record was reviewed for the presence of cardiac manifestations, including clinical assessment in clinic, echocardiogram, 12 lead ECG and 24-hour ECG. Results 60 children were identified with a diagnosis of DM1, 56 (93%) with the congenital form of the disease. The median age at diagnosis was 2.4 (IQR 1.2–24, n=52) months. 51 (85%) were under regular formal cardiac follow up. Cardiac symptoms (syncope, palpitations or chest pain) were present in 6 (10%). 12 lead ECGs were available in 50 (83%) and there was at least one echocardiogram performed in 57 (95%). There were 3 deaths (5%), 2 sudden and unexplained (aged 11 and 6.5 years old). 1 child (2%) underwent pacemaker implantation due to the presence of syncope and evidence of progressive conduction disease (Mobitz II AV block). During the period of follow-up, 37 (62%) patients had evidence of conduction disease on 12 lead ECG or Holter: 1st degree or higher AV block (35%, n=21), trifascicular block (6.7%, n=4), intraventricular conduction delay (32%, n=19), prolonged QTc (15%, n=9) and junctional rhythm (5% n=3). In addition to abnormalities of conduction, 27 (45%) patients had axis deviation and 12 (20%) abnormal repolarisation. Abnormalities were present in 8 (14%) of those with an echocardiogram. 2 (3.5%) had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Other abnormalities included bicuspid aortic valve, aortic root dilatation, dyskinetic septal motion, pericardial effusion, mitral valve thickening and perimembranous VSD. 24 (40%) patients had a signal averaged ECG of which 14 (58%) were positive in 1 or more vector. 3 (5%) patients had an exercise test with no arrhythmia or progression of conduction abnormalities. 1 patient had an invasive EP study showing a prolonged HV interval but no inducible ventricular tachycardia. Conclusions There appears to be a high incidence of cardiac involvement in children with DM1. Adverse events (death and pacemaker implantation) are represented in our cohort. More studies are required in order to establish how we might better identify those at risk of progression of conduction disease and ventricular arrhythmia. Regular and lifelong cardiac follow up is advisable but risk stratification and device implantation remains challenging.

Background While severe mitral regurgitation is a well-established risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is less known whether atrial fibrillation induces mitral/tricuspid valve regurgitation (MR/TR). The present study aims to identify the long-term effects of permanent or non-permanent AF on atrial remodelling and on the progression of MR/TR. Methods The severity of MR/TR was assessed at baseline and after a period of 65±10 months in 37 patients with permanent AF, in 80 patients with non-permanent AF (of whom 43 were treated with ablation) and in 53 control patients with persistent sinus rhythm. MR/TR was qualitatively assessed by the multi-integrative approach, and quantitatively by measurement of the colour jet area. Results At baseline, AF patients had larger MR jet areas than control patients. At follow up, progression of MR, expressed as delta MR jet area, was 0.05±1.3 cm2 in the control group, 0.73±2.1 cm2 in the non-permanent AF group and 1.95±3.6 cm2 in the permanent AF group (p=0.001). Severe MR at follow up was observed in 0%, 2.5%, 8%, respectively. After adjustment for baseline clinical and echocardiographic parameters, permanent AF remained independently associated with the progression of MR. There was a significant positive correlation between a progression of MR and an increase in left atrial volume index (r=0.31, p MR jet area Conclusions The presence of longstanding AF is associated with a significant progression of MR/TR mainly due to atrial remodelling. Our data showed a beneficial effect of sustained rhythm control, either medically or by ablation, on MR/TR progression.

Aims Catheter ablation is indicated in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiar- rhythmic drug therapy (ADT). We investigated whether continued use of previously ineffective ADT beyond the post-ablation blanking period reduces recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within the 1st year after ablation. Methods and results This was a multicentre, randomized controlled study in patients undergoing contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal AF in whom previously ineffective ADT was continued during a blanking period of 3 months. If free of AF at the end of the blanking period, patients were randomly assigned in the ratio of 1:1 to continue ADT (ADT ON group, n= 77) or discontinue ADT (ADT OFF group, n= 76). Patients were followed up until 1 year after PVI, with clinical visits, Hotter monitoring, and quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires at 6 and 12 months post-procedure. Analysis of the primary endpoint (any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 s) was performed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints included repeat ablation, unscheduled visits, and QOL score. Baseline clinical characteristics and initial ablation procedure characteristics were comparable between both groups. Three patients were lost to follow-up in each arm. The primary endpoint was observed in 2 of 74 (2.7%) patients in the ADT ON group vs. 16 of 73 (21.9%) patients in the ADT OFF group (P

Item does not contain fulltext AIMS: According to the diagnostic consensus criteria, the electrocardiographic (ECG) diagnosis of Brugada syndrome requires coved-type > or =2 mm ST-segment elevation in >1 right precordial lead (RPL) V1-V3 in the presence or absence of a sodium-channel blocker. However, this consensus has not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the distribution of coved-type ST-segment elevation on RPLs in a large patient cohort to reevaluate the appropriateness of the diagnostic consensus criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 186 individuals with spontaneous and/or drug-induced ECGs of coved-type > or =2 mm ST-segment elevation in at least one RPL. A total of 376 ECGs were analysed for the number, distribution and maximal J-point elevation of diagnostic RPLs. Among all ECGs, 27 (7%) showed a coved-type pattern in 3 RPLs, 205 (55%) in 2 RPLs, and 144 (38%) in only 1 RPL. Leads V1 and V2 were diagnostic in 99% of all ECGs with two diagnostic RPLs. Lead V3 alone was not diagnostic in any ECG. Maximal J-point elevation was significantly higher in lead V2 than V1. Sixty case subjects (32%) had only ECGs with one RPL displaying a coved-type ST-segment elevation. There was no significant difference in clinical presentation and outcome compared with the 126 Brugada patients with ECGs displaying >1 diagnostic RPL. Major arrhythmic events occurred with the same rate (8%) in both groups during a follow-up >5 years. CONCLUSION: Lead V3 does not yield diagnostic information in Brugada syndrome. Individuals with ECGs displaying only one diagnostic RPL have a similar clinical profile and arrhythmic risk as Brugada patients with ECGs displaying >1 diagnostic RPL. Revision of the consensus criteria should be considered. 01 juni 2010

Aims To analyse the follow-up data of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in Brugada syndrome (BS). Methods and results We conducted a retrospective, single centre study of 47 patients (mean age: 44.5 +/- 15 years) with BS, who underwent primary prophylactic ICD implantation. All patients had baseline spontaneous (23 patients) or drug-induced (24 patients) coved type I ECG pattern. All patients were judged to be at high risk because of syncope (26 patients) and/or a positive family history of sudden death (26 patients). During a median follow-up of 47.5 months, seven patients had appropriate shocks. The presence of spontaneous type I ECG and non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the ICD datalog suggested a trend towards shorter appropriate shock-free survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.037 and P = 0.012, respectively). Seventeen patients received inappropriate shocks (IS); eight patients for sinus tachycardia; six patients for new onset atrial arrhythmias; and five patients for noise oversensing. In multivariable Cox-regression analysis, new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and less than 50 years of age were independent predictors of significantly shorter IS-free survival (P = 0.04 and P = 0.036, respectively). Conclusion In high-risk patients with BS, primary prophylactic ICD therapy is an effective treatment. In this, young and otherwise healthy patient population, the IS rate is high.

We report the case of a 87-year-old woman, without history of significant cardiovascular diseases, referred to our emergency department because of sudden syncope. Just after being admitted, the patient experienced another sudden syncopal event and a paroxysmal complete atrioventricular (AV) block with narrow QRS complexes ( Panel A …

A 15-year-old girl presented to the emergency room after a prolonged episode of seizures following a dental intervention. This episode had been preceded the same day by an episode of dizziness and pre-syncope during a small effort. On admission, the electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 65 bpm, a short duration of the interval PR (102 ms), a QRS axis of 90°, and an important QT prolongation. The QT interval was 577 ms with a corrected QT interval (QTc) of 590 ms. Electrolytes were completely normal. The echocardiogram performed after the admission to the hospital revealed normal left ventricular function with no structural abnormalities. During the first …

Aims Since its emergence in early 2020, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reached pandemic levels, and there have been repeated outbreaks across the globe. The aim of this two part series is to provide practical knowledge and guidance to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular (CV) disease in association with COVID-19. Methods and results A narrative literature review of the available evidence has been performed, and the resulting information has been organized into two parts. The first, which was reported previously, focused on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of CV conditions that may be manifest in patients with COVID-19. This second part addresses the topics of: care pathways and triage systems and management and treatment pathways, both of the most commonly encountered CV conditions and of COVID-19; and information that may be considered useful to help patients with CV disease (CVD) to avoid exposure to COVID-19. Conclusion This comprehensive review is not a formal guideline but rather a document that provides a summary of current knowledge and guidance to practicing clinicians managing patients with CVD and COVID-19. The recommendations are mainly the result of observations and personal experience from healthcare providers. Therefore, the information provided here may be subject to change with increasing knowledge, evidence from prospective studies, and changes in the pandemic. Likewise, the guidance provided in the document should not interfere with recommendations provided by local and national healthcare authorities., Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract