Search

Not only “classic” risk factors such as age, sex, smoking status, blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol (HS) levels, but also additional factors, one of which is the psychological status of the patient, need to be considered to improve the prediction of cardiovascular complications. This is especially true for low/moderate risk patients on the SCORE scale, whose risk of cardiovascular complications (CVC) is often underestimated. Aim To assess the contribution of psychological status of hypertensive patients and SCORE Materials and methods In 2009, 142 hypertensive patients with SCORE risk Results At the time of inclusion in the study, the age of the patients was 50, 9±8.2 years. At the first visit systolic BP (SBP) level was 130.0 (128.4; 133.7) mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) 80.0 (81.3; 84.5) mm Hg. The HS level was 6.1 (5.9; 6.3) mmol/L, triglycirides 1.4 (1.5:1.8) mmol/L, low dencity lipoproteins 3.8 (3.6; 4.0) mmol/L, high density lipoproteins 1.3 (1.4; 1.5) mmol/L. Level of anxiety (A) was 7.0 (7.0; 8.2) points, depression (D) – 5.7 (5.2; 6.2) points. The patients without the expressed symptom of D (0–7 points) – 76.8% (n=109), A (0–7 points) – 52% (n=74). The patients with clinically significant D (>11 points) – 8.5% (n=12), A (>11 points) – 18.3% (n=26). 2 CVD occurred in the observed group in 10 years (1.4%), 6 MI, 12 percutaneous coronary intervention (8 acute coronary syndrome), 4 strokes, 34 cardiovascular hospitalizations. 14 new onset cases of coronary artery disease (9.6%). Thus 31.7% of observed patients had CVC. Comparison of the initial data of the group with CVC with the group without CVC revealed a difference only in the level of D: 7.0 (5.6; 7.3) points in patients with CVC vs 5.0 (4.7; 5.8) p=0.04) – Fig. 1. The patients were comparable in sex and age. BP, lipid profile, glucose, heart rate, smoking status, levels of A did not differ significantly. Multi-factor regression analysis has demonstrated that depression levels D is an independent predictor of the development of complications in a model involving age, sex, BP, HS and A (β=0,218, p=0,03). Conclusion Level D is an independent risk factor development of CVC in hypertensive patients low/moderate risk on SCORE. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background The contributions of the effectively treated hypertension on blood viscosity remain unclear, as well as impact of clinical and demographic parameters, biochemical variables, level of anxiety. Aim Aim of the study is to research viscosity state in patients with effectively treated hypertension and to reveal factors affecting blood viscosity. Materials 58 treated hypertensive patients (36 females and 24 males aged 62,9±9,7 years) with achievement of target blood pressure (BP) level (systolic BP was 130,9 (126,6; 135,4), diastolic BP - 81,4 (79,7; 83,1) mmHg. 71.7% of patients were treated with beta-blockers, 46.7% - angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), 31.7% - angiotensin II receptor blockers, 38.3% - calcium channel antagonists, 18.3% - diuretics, 71.3% - statins, 60% - acetylsalicylic acid. Coronary heart disease (CHD) were presented in 24 (40%). The average cholesterol level was 5.11 (4.76; 5.46) mmol/l, creatinine 71.83±12.6 mmol/l, sodium 143.4 (143.0; 143.9) mmol/l. The level of anxiety disorders determined on Sheehan's Patient-Rated Anxiety Scale (SPRAS) was 33.7 (23.1; 39.2) points. Methods Whole blood viscosity at high (η1) and low (η2) shear rates, plasma viscosity (ηpl) were measured by a rotational viscometer. Aggregation of erythrocytes (η2/ η1) was studied also. The statistical analysis was carried out by nonparametric method of Spearman and multivariate regression analysis with STATISTICA 6. Results Hemorheological profile was as follows: η1 4,7 (4,7; 5,0) sec–1, η 2 24,6 (23,5; 26,5) sec–1, η2/η 1 5,4 (4,9; 5,3), η pl 1,52 (1,51; 1,55) sec–1. Blood viscosity in men was higher than in women in all indices studied: η1 5,4 (5,1; 5,7) sec–1 in men vs 4,6 (4,6; 5,0) sec–1 in women (p Conclusion In effectively treated hypertensive patients the level of anxiety, indirectly reflected the activity of the sympatho-adrenal system, proved to be an independent predictor of a higher value of η2/η1.