Search

Aims: We aimed to test the hypothesis if combining coronary artery calcium score (Ca-score) as a quantitative anatomical marker of coronary atherosclerosis with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin as a quantitative biochemical marker of myocardial injury provided incremental value in the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery disease (fCAD) and risk stratification., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) without prior CAD were enrolled. The diagnosis of fCAD was based on the presence of ischaemia on MPS and coronary angiography; fCAD was centrally adjudicated in the diagnostic and prognostic domain. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The composite of cardiovascular death and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 730 days was the primary prognostic endpoint. Among 1715 patients eligible for the diagnostic analysis, 399 patients had fCAD. The combination of Ca-score and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) had good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of fCAD (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.81), but no incremental value compared with the Ca-score alone (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.81, P = 0.965). Similar results were observed using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) instead of hs-cTnT. Among 1709 patients (99.7%) with available follow-up, 59 patients (3.5%) suffered the composite primary prognostic endpoint (non-fatal AMI, n = 34; CV death, n = 28). Both Ca-score and hs-cTnT had independent prognostic value. Increased risk was restricted to patients with elevation in both markers., Conclusion: The combination of the Ca-score with hs-cTnT increases the prognostic accuracy for future events but does not provide incremental value vs. the Ca-score alone for the diagnosis of fCAD., Study Registration: Clinical trial registration: NCT00470587., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Current assessment of myocardial ischaemia from stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SP-CMR) largely relies on visual interpretation. This study investigated the use of high-resolution free-breathing SP-CMR with automated quantitative mapping in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Diagnostic performance was evaluated against invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement., Methods and Results: Seven hundred and three patients were recruited for SP-CMR using the research sequence at 3 Tesla. Of those receiving ICA within 6 months, 80 patients had either FFR measurement or identification of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) with inducible perfusion defects seen on SP-CMR. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) maps were automatically generated in-line on the scanner following image acquisition at hyperaemic stress and rest, allowing myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) calculation. Seventy-five coronary vessels assessed by FFR and 28 vessels with CTO were evaluated at both segmental and coronary territory level. Coronary territory stress MBF and MPR were reduced in FFR-positive (≤0.80) regions [median stress MBF: 1.74 (0.90-2.17) mL/min/g; MPR: 1.67 (1.10-1.89)] compared with FFR-negative regions [stress MBF: 2.50 (2.15-2.95) mL/min/g; MPR 2.35 (2.06-2.54) P < 0.001 for both]. Stress MBF ≤ 1.94 mL/min/g and MPR ≤ 1.97 accurately detected FFR-positive CAD on a per-vessel basis (area under the curve: 0.85 and 0.96, respectively; P < 0.001 for both)., Conclusion: A novel scanner-integrated high-resolution free-breathing SP-CMR sequence with automated in-line perfusion mapping is presented which accurately detects functionally significant CAD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: As well as their research roles at King’s College London, K.P.K. and S.M. are employed as part of Magnetic Resonance Research Collaborations within Siemens Healthcare Limited. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared.