Search

Aims: With the 2022 pulmonary hypertension (PH) definition, the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) threshold for any PH was lowered from ≥25 to >20 mmHg, and the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) value to differentiate between isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) and combined pre- and post-capillary PH (CpcPH) was reduced from >3 Wood units (WU) to >2 WU. We assessed the impact of this change in the PH definition in aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR)., Methods and Results: Severe AS patients ( n = 503) undergoing pre-AVR cardiac heart catheterization were classified according to both the 2015 and 2022 definitions. The post-AVR mortality [median follow-up 1348 (interquartile range 948-1885) days] was assessed. According to the 2015 definition, 219 (44% of the entire population) patients had PH: 63 (29%) CpcPH, 125 (57%) IpcPH, and 31 (14%) pre-capillary PH. According to the 2022 definition, 321 (+47%) patients were diagnosed with PH, and 156 patients (31%) were re-classified: 26 patients from no PH to IpcPH, 38 from no PH to pre-capillary PH, 38 from no PH to unclassified PH, 4 from pre-capillary PH to unclassified PH, and 50 from IpcPH to CpcPH (CpcPH: +79%). With both definitions, only the CpcPH patients displayed increased mortality (hazard ratios ≈ 4). Among the PH-defining haemodynamic components, PVR was the strongest predictor of death., Conclusion: In severe AS, the application of the 2022 PH definition results in a substantially higher number of patients with any PH as well as CpcPH. With either definition, CpcPH patients have a significantly increased post-AVR mortality., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex clinical condition, and left heart disease is the leading cause. Little is known about the epidemiology and prognosis of combined post- and pre-capillary PH (CpcPH)., Methods and Results: This retrospective analysis of the Swiss PH Registry included incident patients with CpcPH registered from January 2001 to June 2019 at 13 Swiss hospitals. Patient baseline characteristics [age, sex, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and risk factors, including World Health Organization (WHO)-functional class (FC), 6 min walk distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), treatment, days of follow-up, and events (death or loss to follow-up) at last visit] were analysed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Two hundred and thirty-one patients (59.3% women, age 65 ± 12 years, mPAP 48 ± 11 mmHg, PAWP 21 ± 5 mmHg, PVR 7.2 ± 4.8 WU) were included. Survival analyses showed a significantly longer survival for women [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58 (0.38-0.89); P = 0.01] and a higher mortality risk for mPAP > 46 mmHg [HR 1.58 (1.03-2.43); P = 0.04] but no association with age or PVR. Patients stratified to high risk according to four-strata risk assessment had an increased mortality risk compared with patients stratified to low-intermediate risk [HR 2.44 (1.23-4.84); P = 0.01]. A total of 46.8% of CpcPH patients received PH-targeted pharmacotherapy; however, PH-targeted medication was not associated with longer survival., Conclusion: Among patients with CpcPH, women and patients with an mPAP ≤46 mmHg survived longer. Furthermore, risk stratification by using non-invasively assessed risk factors, such as WHO-FC, 6MWD, and NT-proBNP, as proposed for pulmonary arterial hypertension, stratified survival in CpcPH, and might be helpful in the management of these patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.M.D. reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Gebro Pharma, GSK, and MSD and financial support to attend scientific meetings from Janssen and OrPha Swiss outside the submitted work. S.A.G. reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Gebro, and Orpha outside the submitted work. M.L. reports personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from MSD, and personal fees from OrphaSwiss outside the submitted work. S.U. receives research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Zurich, and Swiss Lung League and EMDO foundation and grants, travel support and consultancy fees from Orpha Swiss, Janssen SA, MSD SA, and Novartis, all unrelated to the present work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)