Search

Background For nasotracheal intubation, the nasal pathway between the inferior turbinate and hard palate (lower pathway) is preferred for patient safety. However, selecting the lower pathway can be challenging because passage of the tube through the nasal pathway is usually performed blindly. Objectives We investigated whether facing the bevel of the tracheal tube in the cephalad direction of the patient could help in advancing the tracheal tube through the lower pathway during nasotracheal intubation. Design A randomised, blinded trial. Setting SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea from January 2019 to March 2020. Patients Sixty-eight adult patients undergoing oromaxillary surgeries were enrolled in this study. Interventions Patients were randomly allocated to undergo nasotracheal intubation with the bevel of the tube facing the cephalad direction (intervention group) or to the left (conventional group). Main outcome measures The effects of bevel direction on the pathway of the tube in the nasal cavity, and the incidence of epistaxis were evaluated by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. Results The success rate of the tracheal tube passing through the lower pathway was significantly higher in the intervention group than the conventional group (79.4 vs. 55.9%, relative risk 1.421, 95% CI 1.007 to 2.005, P = 0.038). The incidence of epistaxis was also lower in the intervention group than in the conventional group (41.2 vs. 73.5%, relative risk 0.560, 95% CI 0.357 to 0.878, P = 0.007). Conclusions Facing the bevel of the tracheal tube in the cephalad direction of the patient facilitated selection of the lower pathway and reduced the incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oromaxillary surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03740620.

Previous studies have failed to demonstrate that the head-down tilt position confers benefits in hypovolaemic hypotensive patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic effect and vasopressor use by this position in hypotensive patients after the induction of general anaesthesia.This prospective randomised study involved 98 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery and 40 patients (40.1%) developed hypotension after anaesthesia induction. Upon occurrence of hypotension, patients were randomly allocated to the supine (n = 19) or head-down tilt (n = 21) groups (15° head-down tilt position). Blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index and stroke volume index were recorded at 1-min interval for 10 min from the occurrence of hypotension. Vasopressors were administered to treat hypotension in both groups.No haemodynamic difference was observed between the supine and head-down tilt groups except for SBP changes from baseline at 1 min (-3.98 ± 6.31 vs. 1.84 ± 8.25%, P = 0.004) and 2 min (1.51 ± 14.34 vs. 9.37 ± 10.57%, P = 0.032). The number of vasopressor administrations and percentage of the patients requiring vasopressors in the supine group were greater than that in the head-down tilt group [median 1 (range 1-5) vs. median 0 (range 0-2), P = 0.002, 19/19 (100%) vs. 10/21 (47.6%), P0.001].The head-down tilt position in hypotensive patients following anaesthesia induction reduced vasopressor requirement by almost one third. Minimal haemodynamic effect may be caused by different vasopressor administrations. This result suggests that the head-down tilt position may enable more stable anaesthesia induction in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft or valvular heart surgeries.