Search

Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare and poorly understood malignancy, which seems to be more prevalent in young patients compared with conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Performing prospective clinical trials recruiting patients diagnosed with FLC has proven challenging with scarce data available guiding clinical management. The use of a number of chemotherapy compounds in these patients, including cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and recombinant interferon α-2B (IFN-α-2B), has been reported in the literature, mainly in the form of case reports. The most promising systemic therapy tested so far is the combination of 5-FU infusion and 3-weekly IFN-α-2B, based on results from a phase II clinical trial. This article provides an overview of our own experience with this treatment schedule for patients with FLC, confirming its activity and treatment-derived benefit in the real world. Current challenges being faced by healthcare professionals treating patients with advanced FLC are discussed, especially the increasingly limited access to IFN-α-2B, which could compromise the access to an active therapy in the coming future, and the difficulties in the development of new treatment options for advanced FLC.

Background: Carbohydrate associated antigen (CA19-9) has been approved by the FDA as a biomarker for monitoring treatment effect in pancreatic cancer. However, the value of serum CA19-9 as a biomarker of response to chemotherapy in bile duct cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if a decline in CA19-9 (CA19-9 response) during chemotherapy is predictive of survival in patients with inoperable bile duct cancer. Methods: Consecutive patients with inoperable bile duct cancer treated at a University Hospital were retrospectively included in an investigational cohort (n = 212). Three validation cohorts were established including patients 1) participating in phase I/II trials at a Danish Hospital (n = 71), 2) identified retrospectively in a Canadian cohort (n = 196) and 3) randomized in the ABC-02 trial (n = 410). Patients with a baseline CA19-9 and at least one CA19-9 value measured 10-12 weeks after the start of chemotherapy were included. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: Patients meeting the criteria to be included were 54 in the investigational cohort and 34, 68 and 148 in the three validation sets, respectively. Multivariate analysis included radiological response, performance status, bilirubin, gender, site of cancer, extend of disease, CA19-9 at baseline and age. A hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44-0.80, p = 0.0005) for death in CA19-9 responders was reached in the investigational cohort. The predictive value of CA 19-9 response was confirmed in all three validation cohorts. Conclusions: CA19-9 response is a robust predictor of survival in patients with inoperable bile duct cancer in four independent data sets. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include intrahepatic (IHC), hilar, distal bile duct (DBD) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of host inflammation, is prognostic in several cancers but has not been reviewed in large BTC series, or advanced BTC (ABTC) at diagnosis.Baseline demographics and NLR at diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated in 864 consecutive patients with BTC treated from January 1987 to December 2012. The association between NLR and overall survival (OS) was determined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.Eight hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the analysis, of which 62% had ABTC and 38% had surgery with curative intent. Median age was 65 years, 444 (51%) were male and 727 (84%) had performance status (PS) ⩽ 2. A NLR ⩾ 3.0, PS2, IHC primary, stage, lack of surgery, haemoglobin110 g/L and albumin40 g/L were associated with significantly worse OS on multivariable analysis. A NLR ⩾ 3.0 was an independent prognostic factor for OS for the entire cohort; median OS was 21.6 months versus 12.0 months for patients with NLR3.0 versus NLR ⩾ 3.0 respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)-1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.06-1.50, P = 0.01). NLR was also prognostic in patients with ABTC (HR-1.26, 95% CI; 1.02-1.56, P = 0.035) and hilar cancer: overall group (N = 149) (HR-1.70, 95% CI; 1.10-2.50, P = 0.01) and advanced group (N = 111) (HR-1.57, 95% CI; 1.04-2.44, P = 0.048).Baseline NLR is a readily available and inexpensive prognostic biomarker in patients with BTC and likely warrants validation in large prospective clinical trials.