Search

CHS 828 is a new guanidino-containing drug. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose and the toxicity of CHS 828. CHS 828 was given orally once every 3 weeks. The starting dose was 50 mg, which was escalated to 500 mg. A total of 107 courses was administered to 37 patients. At the 500-mg dose level, two of three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) (grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 thrombocytopenia), establishing this as the MTD. One of seven patients treated at 420 mg dose experienced DLT (grade 4 leucopenia, grade 4 mucositis and grade 4 diarrhoea), and this was considered the recommended dose for phase II studies. Vomiting, haematuria, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were other significant toxicities. The pharmacokinetics of CHS 828 showed large variations both between and within patients. No objective responses were seen. A dose of 420 mg of CHS 828 administered every 3 weeks is the recommended dose, while 500 mg is the MTD.

Yondelis (ET-743) is a novel anticancer agent isolated from the marine ascidian Ecteinascidia turbinata. ET-743 possesses potent antitumour activity and a novel mechanism of action at the level of gene transcription. We conducted two sequential phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic studies of ET-743 given as a 1- or a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion. Seventy-two adults with metastatic or advanced solid tumours received ET-743 in escalating doses between 50 and 1100 microg/m(2), initially as a 1-h infusion, and later at doses between 1000 and 1800 microg/m(2) as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ET-743 was 1100 microg/m(2) for the 1-h infusion schedule and 1800 microg/m(2) when given as a 3-h infusion. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were fatigue, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Transient non-cumulatives grade 3-4 increase in transaminases (not considered DLT) and grades 3-4 nausea and vomiting were frequently observed. Other toxicities (maximum grade 3) included anaemia, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase serum levels, and phlebitis; there were no toxic deaths. One pCR (melanoma), CR (uterine leiomyosarcoma), one PR (colon stromal sarcoma) and a MR (37% tumour shrinkage, gastric stromal sarcoma) were observed. A further 9 patients with colorectal, mesothelioma, bile duct carcinoma and bladder cancer had SD which lasted for six or more treatment cycles. ET-743 pharmacokinetics were linear with the 3-h infusion schedule. The haematological and hepatic toxicities of ET-743 were dose-dependent and not cumulative. Based on the current trial, the recommended dose of ET-743 for phase II studies is 1650 microg/m(2) given as a 3-h infusion.

S-1 is a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine derivate, in which the oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, tegafur, was combined with two 5-FU-modulating substances, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (gimeracil), and potassium oxonate (oteracil), at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. The final mechanism of action is exerted by 5-FU. The present study is the first European phase II trial of S-1 in gastric cancer. The primary study objectives were the safety, toxicity and activity of S-1 in non-pretreated patients with gastric cancer. The secondary objective was the duration of response. Patients had to have histologically- or cytologically-verified metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer; S-1 was administered orally twice daily at 40, then 35 mg/m(2) for 28 days every 5 weeks. The starting dose of 40 mg/m(2) was found to be intolerable due to significant non-haematological toxicity, and this dose was rapidly reduced to 35 mg/m(2) twice daily. Of the 7 patients enrolled at the 40 mg/m(2) level, only 3 were evaluable. At 35 mg/m(2), a response rate of 26.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.0-45.1%) in 23 enrolled patients, and 31.6% (C.I. 14.7-53.0%) in 19 evaluable patients according to an independent radiology review, was found. The median duration of response at 35 mg/m(2) (6 patients) was 223 days (range, 108-828 days), and of stable disease was 111 days (range 68-411 days). S-1 can be administered with an acceptable safety and toxicity in European patients at a dose of 35 mg/m(2) days 1 - 28 every 5 weeks and is associated with a moderate response rate similar to the results achieved with other fluoropyrimidines.

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I study on the novel sulfonamide E7070 was performed to determine the toxicity profile and the recommended dose for phase II studies. The pharmacokinetic profile of E7070 was also determined. E7070 was administered as a continuous infusion over 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. 27 patients were treated at doses ranging from 6 to 200 mg/m(2)/day. As with other administration schedules, the dose-limiting toxicities were dose-dependent, reversible neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Although no objective responses were observed, seven patients had stable disease. E7070 displayed a non-linear pharmacokinetic profile, especially at dose-levels greater than 24 mg/m(2)/day, with a reduction in clearance and an increase in the half-life at the higher dose levels. The risk of myelosuppression became significant with an AUC greater than 4000 microg h/ml. The recommended dose of E7070 for further studies is 96 mg/m(2)/day when administered on a 5-day continuous infusion schedule every 3 weeks.

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the naphthalamide agent, LU 79553, was performed to determine its safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for phase II studies. LU 79553 was given intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid cancers (an extended cohort of patients also received the drug every 6 weeks). 59 patients were enrolled into the study (50 patients in the 3-weekly schedule and 9 patients in the 6-weekly schedule). Dose levels studied ranged from 10 mg/m(2) to 160 mg/m(2). Neuro-muscular toxicity was identified as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This muscular toxicity was observed after administrating total doses of 160-450 mg/m(2) (median 330 mg/m(2)). Non-DLTs consisted of diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue and local venous phlebitis. The major haematological toxicities observed were anaemia and neutropenia (and were mainly observed at the two highest dose levels). The proposed dose for phase II studies using the 3-weekly regimen is 100 mg/m(2)/course (60 min infusion in 500 ml normal saline), but a close clinical follow-up of the patients for neuromuscular toxicity is mandatory. Prolongation of the treatment interval to 6 weeks, based upon the long half-life of the drug in the plasma and tissue, observed during this study, seemed not to be feasible in this heavily pretreated group of patients.

LU 103793 is a synthetic analogue of Dolastatin 15 that inhibits tubulin polymerisation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of LU 103793 in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with two lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients received LU 103793 at a dose of 2.5 mg/m(2)/day over 5 min for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Thirty-four patients were enrolled and 23 patients were eligible for the evaluation of efficacy. Eleven patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Other related grade 3/4 adverse events included asthenia (three patients), stomatitis (1), myalgia (1) and increase of serum bilirubin (2). The main toxicity was hypertension occurring in seven out of 34 patients. There were no objective responses, 7 patients had stable disease. These results do not support the further evaluation of LU 103793 in metastatic breast cancer patients using this dose and schedule.

Fifty-seven patients with MAGE-3-positive measurable metastatic cancer, most of them with melanoma, were vaccinated with escalating doses of a recombinant MAGE-3 protein combined with a fixed dose of the immunological adjuvant SBAS-2, which contained MPL and QS21. The immunisation schedule included 4 intramuscular (i.m.) injections at 3-week intervals. Patients whose tumour stabilised or regressed after 4 vaccinations received 2 additional vaccinations at 6-week intervals. The vaccine was generally well tolerated. Among the 33 melanoma patients who were evaluable for tumour response, we observed 2 partial responses, 2 mixed responses and 1 stabilisation. Time to progression in these 5 patients varied from 4 to 29 months. In addition, a partial response lasting 10 months was observed in 1 of the 3 metastatic bladder cancer patients included. None of the tumour responses described above involved visceral metastases. Immunological responses to the vaccine will be reported separately.

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined as well as the SCH 66336-induced inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase in vivo. SCH 66336 was given orally once daily (OD) without interruption to patients with histologically-confirmed solid tumours. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. 12 patients were enrolled into the study. Dose levels studied were 300 mg (6 patients) and 400 mg (6 patients) OD. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. Although at 400 mg OD only 1 patient had a grade 3 diarrhoea, 3 out of 6 patients interrupted treatment early due to a combination of various grade 1-3 toxicities (diarrhoea, uremiacreatinine, asthenia, vomiting, weight loss) indicating that this dose was not tolerable for a prolonged period of time. At 300 mg OD, the same pattern of toxicities was observed, but all were grade 1-2. Therefore, this dose can be recommended for phase II studies. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that peak plasma concentrations as well as the AUCs were dose-related, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation upon multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 5 to 9 h and appeared to increase with increasing dose. Steady state plasma concentrations were attained by day 14. A large volume of distribution at steady state suggested extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. There is evidence of inhibition of protein prenylation in some patients after OD oral administration of SCH 66336. SCH 66336 can be safely administered using a continuous oral OD dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 300 mg OD.

The pyrimido-pyrimidine BIBX 1382 BS inhibits the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), thus specifically reverting the aberrant enzymatic activity from overexpressed and constitutively activated EGFR. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of this new specific molecule was carried out. After initially performing an accelerated titration design from the first toxicities onwards, a modified Fibonacci scheme was used to escalate the daily oral dose. The following dosages and cycles (defined as treatment during 28 days) were applied: 25 mg: 6; 50 mg: 3; 100 mg: 6; 200 mg: 7; 150 mg: 3. Over a 10 months accrual phase, 11 patients (pts) (7 females, 4 males) with a median age of 63 years (range 50-73 years), World Health Organization Performance Status (WHO PS) 0:5 pts, 1:6 pts and miscellaneous solid tumours were entered. The median number of cycles applied per pt was 2 (range 1-7). Reversible, dose-dependent increase of liver enzymes (maximal Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grades: gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT): 4, aspartate aminotransferase (GOT): 3, alanine aminotransferase (GPT): 3, alkaline phosphatase (AP): 3, bilirubin: 3) occurred. Oral medication yielded plasma levels far below those expected to be efficacious. In conclusion, target plasma levels could not be reached via the oral route at a reasonable dosage. Meanwhile, a preclinically unknown metabolite was identified from the urine of one patient. Subsequently, this metabolite was found to be abundant in patient plasma. The metabolite was demonstrated to be pharmacologically inactive. Due to a dose-limiting increase of liver enzymes, low bioavailability of BIBX 1382 BS and the detection of a pharmacologically inactive metabolite, this trial was discontinued.

A randomised, open label phase II study was performed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer to evaluate the safety, toxicity and antineoplastic activity of the topoisomerase I-inhibitor rubitecan. A cross-over design was chosen to determine the intrapatient variation of the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent depending on the timing of food intake in relation to the oral drug administration. Patients with previously untreated metastatic disease received two single oral doses of rubitecan 1.5 mg/m2 for assessment of the pharmacokinetics. They were randomised to have the first administration either after an overnight fasting period or immediately after a high calorie breakfast, and crossed over to the alternative schedule after a one-week washout period. After completion of the pharmacokinetic sampling, treatment continued with rubitecan given orally at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/day, to be increased up to 2.0 mg/m2/day, under fasting conditions for 5 consecutive days per week until disease progression. 19 patients entered the trial after informed consent was obtained. A total number of 35 treatment cycles (median 2, range 1-4) were administered. All patients were evaluable for safety. The toxicity profile of rubitecan was generally mild to moderate, with sporadic cases of grade 4 toxicities (Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0) diarrhoea, leucopenia and neutropenia. None of 15 evaluable patients achieved an objective response. The majority had early disease progression. 14 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. The bioavailability of rubitecan was found to be strongly dependent on the timing of food intake with a fasted-to-fed ratio for C(max) of 1.98 (two-tailed P<0.001; ANOVA), T(max) 0.49 (P<0.001), AUC(0-8 h) 2.52 (P<0.001) and AUC(0-24 h) 1.64 (P=0.003). Rubitecan is well tolerated, but clinically inactive in colorectal cancer at the currently recommended dose and schedule. The bioavailability is strongly dependent on the timing of food intake in relation to the oral administration of the drug. The topoisomerase I-inhibitor should be administered under fasting conditions to achieve adequate drug exposure in future prospective trials in other tumour types.

The aim of this study was to determine the patient's preference for oral UFT/leucovorin (LV) or intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare 5-FU exposure with these two treatment options. A total of 37 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to start treatment with either oral UFT 300 mg/m2/day plus oral LV 90 mg/day for 28 days every 5 weeks or i.v. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. For the second treatment cycle, patients were crossed-over to the alternative treatment regimen. Prior to the first and after the second therapy cycle, patients were required to complete a therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were determined by taking blood samples on days 8, 15 or 22 and 28 for UFT and on days 1 and 5 for i.v. 5-FU. 36 patients were eligible. 84% of the patients preferred oral UFT over i.v. 5-FU. After having experienced both treatment modalities, patients indicated taking the medication at home, less stomatitis and diarrhoea, and pill over injection as the most important reasons for their preference. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for 5-FU after UFT administration was 113 microM x min on day 8, 114 on day 15 and 98 on day 28; the peak levels (Cmax) were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.0 microM, respectively. The AUC for the 5-FU/LV courses was 3083 microM x min for day 1 and 3809 for day 5 (P=0.002). The Cmax was 170.1 and 196.2 microM (P=0.06) and the clearance 2.6 and 1.9 l/min, respectively (P=0.002). Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer clearly preferred oral over i.v. chemotherapy treatment. This choice was most importantly influenced by convenience and toxicity considerations. Although i.v. bolus 5-FU leads to higher peak 5-FU concentrations and AUC values compared with oral UFT, this pharmacokinetic advantage of i.v. 5-FU seems to translate mainly into higher toxicity as seen in large randomised studies comparing oral UFT/LV with i.v. 5-FU/LV. Oral UFT/LV compares favourably with i.v. 5-FU/LV in terms of toxicity and patient's preference and leads to prolonged 5-FU exposure, which is comparable to continuous i.v. 5-FU treatment.

A phase II study was performed to evaluate 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil and uracil (UFT) and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in European patients with advanced gastric cancer. From 38 patients, 25 were evaluable for response and 36 for toxicity. Patients received UFT at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 28 days, every 35 days and leucovorin at 90 mg/day on an identical schedule. Overall response rate was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-22.5%) in intent-to-treat analysis and 16% (95% CI: 5.7-33%) in evaluable patients. Grade 3-4 common toxicity criteria (CTC) toxicities were diarrhoea (28%; 10/36), nausea (11%; 4/36), vomiting (8%; 3/36) and asthenia (11%; 4/36). 23 patients in 44% (42/96) of the courses had to skip days of treatment due to toxicity or to non-compliance. In conclusion, UFT+leucovorin has a definitive, but low, efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal and treatment needs to be withheld if grade 2 diarrhoea occurs.

The antitumour activity of docetaxel was investigated in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, intravenous, over 60 min, was administered every 3 weeks. Response evaluation was performed after two cycles. No prophylactic treatment with steroids or antihistamines was given. 38 patients were included, 36 were eligible and evaluable for toxicity and 30 patients were evaluable for response. The main haematological toxicity was neutropenia [17 patients with common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 4 and 11 CTC grade 3] with nadir after 5-8 days and rapid recovery. The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was generalised alopecia (83% of the patients). Asthenia, malaise and fatigue were also seen in 58%. Skin toxicity was also frequent. Hypersensitivity reactions (erythematous rash, urticaria, blood pressure changes and tachycardia), seen in 42% of the patients, were mild to moderate. Oedema was registered in one fifth of the patients and developed after four or more treatment cycles. The overall response rate in the evaluable patients was 17% (five partial responders). We conclude that docetaxel has activity in advanced malignant melanoma.

Docetaxel (Taxotere), an analogue of paclitaxel, was tested in a phase II study in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Consenting patients with measurable lesions, adequate organ functions and no prior chemotherapy received 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. No premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions or nausea and emesis was given. 32 eligible patients received 100 treatment cycles. Short-lasting neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Acute hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), oedema and skin changes were other important side-effects. HSRs regressed spontaneously or were treated with antihistamines with or without corticosteroids. One partial remission was documented. At the dose and schedule used, docetaxel has only low activity against renal cell carcinoma.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a new cytotoxic compound with a broad spectrum of activity in preclinical studies. This paper reports a phase II trial in patients with previously-treated small cell carcinoma of the lung. 34 patients received 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel in an intravenous infusion given over 1 h every 21 days. Seven partial responses were reported (25% of 28 evaluable patients). Duration of response was 3.5-12.6 months. Toxicities were predominantly neutropenia, alopecia and asthenia. Docetaxel is a new compound with activity in previously-treated patients with small cell lung cancer, and is suitable for evaluation in combination with other cytotoxic drugs active in this disease.

Vintriptol, a tryptophan ester of vinblastine, is a new vinca alkaloid derivative. Preclinical studies have demonstrated its antitumour activity in a large variety of animal models. In this phase I study, 47 patients with advanced cancer were exposed to escalating doses of vintriptol, starting at 6 mg/m2 and following a modified Fibonacci schedule. The drug was administered as an intravenous push on a weekly schedule. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose was 45 mg/m2. Other toxicities consisted of mild nausea and vomiting and the occurrence of fever and dryness of the mouth immediately after drug administration. Neurotoxicity, a major side-effect of other vinca alkaloids, was insignificant. 1 partial remission in a patient suffering from colorectal cancer and 1 minor response in a patient with a metastatic tumour of the cutaneous appendagous glands were documented. Pharmacokinetics of vintriptol were evaluated at the highest dose levels. A dose schedule of 40 mg/m2 vintriptol per week is recommended for phase II studies.