1. Social stratification, risk factor prevalence and cancer screening attendance
- Author
-
Jean-Yves Blay, Chantal Touboul, Yvan Coscas, Christine Lhomel, Xavier Pivot, Jean-François Morère, Jérôme Viguier, and François Eisinger
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Gerontology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Population ,Breast Neoplasms ,Underserved Population ,Risk Factors ,Cancer screening ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Risk factor ,education ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Aged ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Public health ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Attendance ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,Health Surveys ,Sociological Factors ,Social deprivation ,Oncology ,Female ,France ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business ,Demography - Abstract
This analysis aimed to assess the extent to which exposure to cancer risk factors and attendance of screening programmes are influenced by social characteristics. The validated Evaluation of deprivation and health inequalities in public health centres (EPICES) index was used to measure social deprivation. A sample of the general population (N=1603) was assessed to search for potential correlations between screening attendance, risk factors and any components of the EPICES score. In 2011, 33% of the population studied was classified as 'vulnerable'. Sex had no significant impact on this rating (32% men, 35% women), whereas occupational status did. Vulnerable individuals were more likely already to have cancer (10 vs. 7%; nonsignificant difference; odds ratio 1.43 [0.98-2.10]). The mean BMI was 26.0 kg/m (SD 4.9) for the vulnerable population versus 24.8 kg/m (SD 3.9) in the nonvulnerable population (P
- Published
- 2015