Search

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Since percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) was introduced to prolong the lifetime of surgically placed right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduits, valve technology has evolved and the indications for PPVI expanded to native and larger right ventricular outflow tracts. We explore how indications, patient populations and outcomes compare to surgical pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of PPVI and PVR procedures between 1998 and 2020 at a single UK centre. One hundred and twenty-eight patients underwent PPVI and 365 patients PVR. Primary outcome measures were survival, infective endocarditis and reintervention. RESULTS The most common indication for PVR was replacement of the native pulmonary valve for pulmonary regurgitation whereas PPVI was more commonly used to treat pulmonary stenosis in a previously placed bioprosthetic conduit or valve. Treatment indications for PPVI expanded over the study to include the native right ventricular outflow tract. Survival was similar for PPVI and PVR (92% PPVI and 96.8% PVR at 5 years; 85.8% PPVI and 95.1% PVR at 10 years). Preprocedural New York Heart Association class 3 and 4 was the most important predictor of poor outcome. Annualized infective endocarditis rate was significantly higher for the Melody PPVI (0.024 vs 0.0024/person/year for PVR, P  < 0.05). Both groups showed significant symptomatic improvement postprocedure with remodelling of ventricular volumes and improvement in cardiac output. Long-term follow-up for PVR showed half of patients will need replacement at 10–15 years post-index procedure. CONCLUSIONS An increasing number of patients requiring PVR can now be treated percutaneously. A lifetime strategy for re-valving should be considered at the first valve implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Many adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot will require a pulmonary valve replacement (PVR), but there is no consensus on the best timing. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of age at PVR on outcomes. METHODS This is a national multicentre retrospective study including all patients >15 years of age with repaired tetralogy of Fallot who underwent their first PVR between 2000 and 2013. The optimal age cut-off was identified using Cox regression and classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS A total of 707 patients were included, median age 26 (15–72) years. The mortality rate at 10 years after PVR was 4.2%, and the second PVR rate of 6.8%. Age at PVR of 35 years was identified as the optimal cut-off in relation to late mortality. Patients above 35 years of age had a 5.6 fold risk of death at 10 years compared with those with PVR under 35 years (10.4% vs 1.3%, P  < 0.001), more concomitant tricuspid valve repair/replacement (15.1% vs 5.7%, P  < 0.001) and surgical arrhythmia treatment (18.4% vs 5.9%, P  < 0.001). In those under 50 years, there was an 8.7 fold risk of late death compared with the general population, higher for those with PVR after 35 than those with PVR below 35 years (hazard ratio 9.9 vs 7.4). CONCLUSIONS Patients above 35 years of age with repaired tetralogy of Fallot have significantly worse mortality after PVR, compared with younger patients and a higher burden of mortality relative to the general population. This suggests that there are still cases where the timing of initial PVR is not optimal, warranting a re-evaluation of criteria for intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]