Search

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the effect of preoperative symptoms on long-term survival and valve reintervention in patients undergoing aortic valve repair (AVr) for severe degenerative aortic insufficiency (AI). METHODS Between March 1996 and June 2010, 274 patients underwent AVr for severe AI. Seventy-seven were performed in asymptomatic patients (Group I) and 197 were performed in symptomatic (Group II). Patients in Group I were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 54.1 ± 15.5 years; P < 0.001) with a higher proportion of bicuspid valves (n = 40, 51.9% vs n = 68, 30.4%; P = 0.008). Group II had more patients with impaired left ventricular (LV; n = 36, 18.3% vs n = 5, 6.4%; P = 0.013). The mean follow-ups for Group I and Group II were 43.0 ± 34.0 and 61.3 ± 39.5 months, respectively. RESULTS There was no in-hospital mortality. Overall, leaflet repair and reimplantation were higher in Group I (P = < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively), whereas subcommissural annuloplasty for tricuspid AV was higher in Group II (P = 0.002). Leaflet shaving and plication were performed in more patients in Group I (P = 0.002 for both). There was no difference in early complications, but during follow-up atrial fibrillation was more frequent in Group II (P = 0.03). There were 10 late cardiac deaths, all in Group II (P = 0.04). Overall, 10-year cardiac survival was better in Group I (100 vs 77.3 ± 8.6%) but not significant (P = 0.1). At 10 years, freedom from ≥AI2+ was 63.2 ± 8.1 vs 56.4 ± 4.5% (P = 0.4), and freedom from AV reintervention was 81.8 ± 7.1 vs 89.0 ± 2.8% (P = 0.36), in Groups I and II, respectively. In the whole cohort, 10-year freedom from AV reintervention was greater in patients with an end-diastolic diameter of <60 mm (90.0 ± 7.6 vs 76.3 ± 5.5%; P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified increasing age as the only independent predictor of overall survival (P = 0.03). The incidence of valve-related complications was similar. CONCLUSION In asymptomatic patients with severe degenerative AI, AVr is associated with excellent long-term outcomes, while symptoms are associated with reduced long-term survival. In dilated LV, freedom from reoperation is lower. If feasible, early AVr is recommended in experienced centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES The spread of drug-eluting stents (DES) has reduced the incidence of early restenosis following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Meanwhile, development of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) has offered a valuable alternative to conventional sternotomy with preservation of the benefit of the internal mammary artery use. Therefore, the revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is suitable for both techniques. However, few data with long-term comparison of these two techniques exist. METHODS Prospective data were collected for 456 patients undergoing isolated LAD revascularization between 1997 and 2011. Two hundred and sixty patients were treated with MIDCAB and 196 with first-generation DES implantation. A propensity score model was created to adjust for 19 relevant confounding variables. Primary and secondary end-points were, respectively, 5-year survival and freedom from major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS Both groups were similar in age, EuroSCORE and mean duration of follow-up. Five-year survival was similar after MIDCAB or DES (hazard ratio (HR): 0.95; P = 0.89). Freedom from MACCE was significantly in favour of the MIDCAB group (HR: 0.32, P < 0.0001), mainly triggered by high subsequent need for revascularization of the targeted vessel in the DES group (HR: 0.17, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS MIDCAB and DES implantation showed similar rates of survival but despite an expected lower rate of reintervention on the targeted vessel with DES use, a highly significant higher MACCE rate was observed in the PCI group at 5-year follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

OBJECTIVES The long-term advantages of multiple arterial grafts, particularly a third arterial conduit, for coronary artery bypass (CABG) are not clear. This study was designed to test whether multiple arterial grafts would provide better long-term outcomes when compared with approaches using fewer arterial conduits. METHODS Between 1985 and 1995, prospective data were collected for 588 patients undergoing isolated CABG at our institution. We examined long-term survival and freedom from cardiac death. The primary analysis compared patients receiving bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) vs. single ITA (SITA). In a subgroup analysis, BITA patients receiving a right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) were compared with those receiving a saphenous vein graft (SVG) as a third conduit. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to adjust for relevant confounders. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves over the follow-up period. RESULTS The mean age was 59 ± 9 years and 49% received BITA. Mean follow-up was 16.1 ± 5.4 years. Multivariable analysis revealed that overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.017] and cardiac survival (HR: 0.61, P = 0.004) was significantly improved in the presence of BITA compared with SITA. The survival at 10 and 20 years was 90.2 ± 3.4 and 56.9 ± 6.4% for the BITA vs. 82 ± 4.4 and 40.9 ± 6% for the SITA, respectively. In the subgroup of BITA patients, those receiving the RGEA as a third conduit had superior overall survival (HR: 0.41, P = 0.0032) and cardiac survival (HR: 0.18, P = 0.004) compared with those receiving an SVG. The survival at 10 and 20 years was 98.9 ± 2 and 68.9 ± 18% for the BITA/RGEA vs. 87.2 ± 4.6 and 50.3 ± 7% for the BITA/SVG, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In a single-institution experience, the use of multiple arterial grafting is independently associated with superior outcomes. Furthermore, the use of a third arterial conduit (RGEA) targeted to the right coronary artery should be considered to improve long-term survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, the author comments on competitive flow in arterial grafting. He mentions that due to the lower pressure in the distal portion, competitive flow is more frequent at the right coronary anastomosis of composite Y grafts. He concludes that optimization of myocardial revascularization can be achieved by more accurate assessments of graft function and pre-operative status with the help of quantitative angiography or fractional flow reserve.