Search

OBJECTIVES Aortic valved allografts (homografts) have been used alternatively to mechanical or biological valve prostheses in expectation of better durability; however, homograft valves do degenerate, and redo procedures have proven challenging due to heavy wall calcification. The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of open surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in degenerated homografts. METHODS Between 1993 and 2022, 81 patients underwent repeat aortic valve procedures having previously received an aortic homograft. The redo had become necessary due to regurgitation in 85% and stenosis in 15%. Sixty-five percent underwent open surgery, 35% TAVR. RESULTS Isolated SAVR was possible in 79%, and root procedures were necessary in 21%. TAVR was performed in 79% via transfemoral and 21% via transapical access. Median prosthetic valve size was 23 (22.3–23.2) mm in the SAVR and 26 (25.2–26.9) in the TAVR group. Thirty-day mortality was 0% in the TAVR and 7% in the SAVR group (P  = n.s.). TAVR showed a significantly better outcome concerning prolonged ventilation (0 vs 21%, P  = 0.013) as well as ICU (1 vs 2 days; P  < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (10.5 vs 13 days; P  = 0.028). Five-year survival was statistically comparable between groups, and no severe leakage was observed. CONCLUSIONS SAVR following structural homograft degeneration shows acceptable results, but the perioperative risk remains substantial and poorly predictable. TAVR presents a reasonable and more easily accessible alternative and is associated with good short- and mid-term results. In the absence of relevant contraindications, TAVR is presently the preferred treatment option for these patients at our center. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first-in-man implant of a custom-made branched frozen elephant trunk graft designed for an anastomosis in aortic arch zone 0 is reported. Combining endovascular technology with open surgical techniques has allowed for simplification of the open procedure with substantial reduction in circulatory arrest time and in the extent of the surgical preparations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: No guidelines for mechanical circulatory support in patients with therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure including ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) exist. To achieve immediate cardiopulmonary stabilization, we established an interdisciplinary concept with on-site percutaneous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) implantation. METHODS: From February 2012 to November 2014, 96 patients were deemed eligible for ECLS implantation. Establishing ECLS was successful in 87 patients (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 16% female, initial flow 4.4 ± 0.9 l/min). Aetiologies included acute coronary syndromes(n = 52, 60%), cardiomyopathies (n = 25, 29%) and other pathologies. Fifty-nine patients (68%) had been resuscitated, and in 27 (31%), implantation was performed during CPR; 11 patients (13%) were awake at implantation and 20 (23%) underwent implantation in the referring hospital. RESULTS: Metabolic parameters differed in non-survivors versus survivors before ECLS implantation (pH 7.15 ± 0.23 vs. 7.27 ± 0.18, P = 0.007; lactate levels 10.90 ± 6.00 mmol/l vs. 8.79 ± 5.78 mmol/l, P = 0.091) and 6 h postimplantation (pH 7.27 ± 0.11 vs. 7.37 ± 0.11, P < 0.001; lactate levels 10.19 ± 5.52 mmol/l vs. 5.52 ± 4.17 mmol/l, P < 0.001). Altogether 44 patients could be weaned, and 9 were bridged to assist device implantation and 1 to heart transplantation. The mean time of support was 6 days, and the 30-day survival rate was 47% (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: ECLS serves as a bridge-to-decision and bridge-to-treatment device. Our interdisciplinary ECLS programme achieved acceptable survival of critically ill patients despite a substantial percentage of patients having been resuscitated and no absolute exclusion criteria. Further studies defining inclusion- and exclusion criteria might additionally improve outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES The management of infected Dacron grafts in the ascending aortic position involving the aortic arch and aortic root remains a technical challenge. Total replacement of the infected graft material with cryopreserved homografts appears to be an effective treatment strategy for these patients. METHODS Seventeen consecutive patients were operated on for infection of their ascending aortic graft where the aortic arch was also involved 26 ± 33 months after initial surgery, in 70%, for type A aortic dissection (12 acute aortic dissection type A and 1 chronic aortic dissection type A). The aortic root was additionally affected in 14 patients. Computed tomography and echocardiography follow-up was performed in all patients. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 24% (n = 4). Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 288 ± 128 and 165 ± 78 min, respectively. In 14 patients, the aortic root was replaced. Hypothermic circulatory arrest was necessary in all patients (41 ± 25 min) with additional cold selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in 14 (41 ± 30 min). During follow-up, 1 patient died due to a cerebral haemorrhage at 3 months and another at 4 years, of pulmonary embolism. Two patients were successfully reoperated on for degeneration of the aortic valve at 16 and 94 months; 1 patient had an early degeneration of the homograft and needed re-replacement with a homograft. In 2 other patients, a stent graft had to be placed to cover the distal anastomosis between the homograft and native aorta. In all others, recent follow-up revealed no degeneration of the implanted homografts. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for infected Dacron grafts in the ascending aortic position with involvement of the arch can be performed with an acceptable perioperative mortality. In case of degeneration of the valve, reoperations can be performed with good results in experienced hands. Therefore, we consider the concept of complete explantation of all infected material and replacement with homografts a successful treatment strategy. Nevertheless, close follow-up of the patients is mandatory so as not to miss any degeneration or reinfection of the implanted grafts. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

OBJECTIVES The combined disease of the aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta remains a surgical challenge. With the ‘frozen elephant technique’, the ascending aorta, along with the aortic arch, is replaced conventionally and an endovascular stent graft is placed into the descending aorta in the antegrade manner through the open aortic arch, thereby potentially allowing for a ‘single-stage’ operation. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of a novel four-branched hybrid graft (Vascutek, Scotland). METHODS From April 2010 to August 2011, 34 patients (25 males, age 60 ± 14 years) were operated on [14 aneurysms, 20 dissections (18 acute)]. Ten of these patients had undergone previous cardiac operations. The collapsed endoprosthesis was deployed in the descending aorta through the opened aortic arch. A sewing collar between the graft segments simplified the ‘distal’ anastomosis. The four-branched graft segment allowed the replacement of the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels individually. Concomitant procedures were performed if necessary. RESULTS There were three deaths within the 30 postoperative days. All of them were of AADA patients. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 254 ± 53 min, aortic cross clamp time was 148 ± 48 min and circulatory arrest time was 48 ± 22 min. Aortic valve-sparing root surgery was performed in 12 patients, Bentall procedure in four, CABG in three and mitral valve repair in two. In one patient, a secondary endovascular extension of the stent graft was necessary to reach the landing zone. In all others, postoperative CT-Scans confirmed the desired results. CONCLUSIONS The graft adds to the ‘frozen elephant trunk’ concept for treating the arch and proximal descending aorta. Early experience demonstrates an excellent 30-day survival. Combining the frozen elephant with a four-branched arch graft increases the armament of the surgeon in the treatment of complex and diverse aortic arch pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Homografts for the management of graft infections in the ascending aortic position" by P. Tossios et al that was published in the previous issue.

Two photographs related to patent foramen ovale (PFO) heart defect and Eisenmenger's syndrome including post-interventional chest X-ray image and transoesophageal echocardiographic report of the defect are presented.

The article presents a case study of a 69-year old man who underwent a computed tomography scan after he fell from a ladder.