Search

Background: Anti-PD1 antibodies have revolutionized the management of patients with advanced melanoma. In clinical trials, the efficacy of nivolumab is being tested in selected populations of patients., Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma under real-life conditions., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients treated with nivolumab for advanced melanoma included in the RIC-Mel network. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Eighty-seven patients were included with a median follow-up of 31 months. The median PFS was 13 months (95% CI: 7-28). Objective response rate was 33.3%. Among patients achieving a complete response, the response was maintained after treatment discontinuation in 80.7% of patients for a median duration of 21.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that an increased lactate dehydrogenase level (p = 0.03; HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.02-1.45) and brain metastases (p = 0.024; HR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.14-6.77) were correlated with a decrease in PFS. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were found in 10.3% of patients., Conclusion: Based on our study, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma are consistent with previously published data.

For melanoma patients, surgery is a standard treatment for locoregional skin metastasis (LSM). To assess the frequency and risk factors for positive margins after excision of LSM and their impact on patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A monocentric, retrospective observational study was performed including 87 patients with LSM who had undergone surgical excision. Positive margins were found in 45% of patients after excision. After additional excision, 28% of patients still had positive margins. Interestingly, there was no difference in PFS or OS for clear margins after the first or additional excision or for margins that remained positive without additional excision. LSM size was the only identified predictive factor for positive margins. This is the first reported study investigating the frequency of, and risk factors for positive margins of cutaneous LSM, which raises the question of whether additional excision should be performed following positive margin excision.

Few satisfactory treatment options are available for widespread areas affected by multiple actinic keratoses (AKs). Our primary objective was to assess the response rate to weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemowraps on widespread AK lesions, and secondarily to assess tolerability, the percentage of patients with recurrence and time to recurrence, the response rate for patients with associated Bowen's disease (BD), and the percentage of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) identified after treatment. We conducted an open study which included all the patients who had been treated with weekly 5-FU chemowraps in our department over the course of five years for areas of widespread AKs. The response rate for AKs was 60%, with 20% complete responses among 25 patients after an average of 9.6 sessions (1 to 64). The treatment had to be discontinued because of toxicity in four patients; one case of contact dermatitis, one case of erosive pustular dermatosis, and two cases of Grade 2 irritations. Invasive SCCs were identified in five patients after treatment cessation. The median recurrence-free survival was five months. A 64% response rate was achieved for associated BD. The weekly application of 5-FU under occlusion seems to be an interesting, well-tolerated therapeutic option for the treatment of widespread AKs.

Background: New targeted melanoma therapies such as B-RAF inhibitors have shown high and promising clinical benefit but have cutaneous side-effects, including photosensitivity, which is triggered in the UVA radiation spectrum. However, visible spectrum implication has not yet been investigated. We conducted a study to determine whether visible light also contributes to the phototoxicity action spectrum of vemurafenib. The secondary end points were to determine the time to complete regression of the phototoxicity post-vemurafenib discontinuation and whether there was a significant difference between the UVA radiation immediate reactivity cut-offs, in patients treated with vemurafenib vs. those treated with dabrafenib., Method: This prospective, observational study included patients with B-RAF mutant metastatic melanoma: 34 patients treated with vemurafenib and 9 with dabrafenib., Results: The visible-light phototest results in patients treated with vemurafenib were all negative before and after 2 months of treatment. The UVA radiation phototests conducted 1 or 2 weeks post-vemurafenib discontinuation in 4 patients showed a normalised UVA-radiation reactivity cut-off. UVA radiation phototests after 2 months of treatment were conducted for all patients. The UVA radiation reactivity cut-off had been lowered for 30 patients (88%) on vemurafenib and 3 patients (33%) on dabrafenib. The median UVA radiation reactivity cut-off was 12 J/cm(2) for the patients on vemurafenib and 20 J/cm(2) for the patients on dabrafenib., Conclusion: B-RAF inhibitor phototoxicity is exclusively triggered by UVA radiation and resolves rapidly post-treatment discontinuation. A significant difference between the UVA immediate reactivity cut-offs, vemurafenib vs. dabrafenib, explains the difference in the clinical photosensitivity rates reported in the clinical trials.

Background: Vemurafenib is a BRAF inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. We report the two first cases of severe and prolonged radiotherapy-induced visceral toxicity in patients treated concomitantly with vemurafenib: a brain radionecrosis and an anorectitis. It raises the question of both the risks of this association and its benefit in melanoma., Observations: The first patient, a female aged 32, treated with vemurafenib for three months, presented a steroid-dependent radionecrosis after brain stereotactic radiosurgery. Symptoms persisted until her death six months later. The second patient, a male aged 64 and treated with vemurafenib for nineteen days, presented a radiation-induced anorectitis complicated by diarrhoea, anorexia and weight loss following the concomitant radiation of a primary rectal tumour. A colostomy was needed after ten months in order to improve local status and general health., Conclusions: In our patients, the radiotherapy-induced toxicity under vemurafenib was unusual in its intensity and duration, suggesting a radiosensitization phenomenon. This hypothesis is reinforced by the publication of six cases of severe radiodermatitis under vemurafenib and by in vitro data. The combination of vemurafenib and radiotherapy should thus lead to discussion of a transient cessation of vemurafenib, given the severity of the adverse events experienced. Meanwhile, further studies are needed to determine the potential benefit of this combined treatment in metastatic melanoma.