Search

Background: Abdominal interventions are usually contraindicated in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension because of increased morbidity and mortality. Decreasing portal pressure with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) may improve patient outcomes. We report our experience with patients treated by neoadjuvant TIPS to identify those who would most benefit from this two-step procedure., Patients and Methods: All patients treated by dedicated neoadjuvant TIPS between 2005 and March 2013 in two tertiary referral hospitals were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of failure, defined by the inability to proceed to the planned intervention after TIPS placement or persistent liver decompensation 3 months after intervention. The secondary endpoints were the rate of complications, parameters associated with failure, and 1-year survival., Results: Twenty-eight consecutive patients were included, with a mean age of 61.2±6.6 years, mean Child-Pugh score of 6.6±1.5, and mean model for end-stage liver disease score of 10.4±3.3. Procedures were digestive (43%) or liver (25%) resections, abdominal wall surgery (21%), or interventional gastrointestinal endoscopies (11%). The scheduled procedure was performed in 24 (86%) patients within a median of 25 days after TIPS. Procedure failures occurred in six (21%) patients: four did not undergo surgery and two experienced persistent liver decompensation. Seven (25%) patients had postoperative complications, mainly local. Viral origin of cirrhosis, history of encephalopathy, and hepatic surgery were found to be associated with failure. One-year survival in the whole cohort was 70%., Conclusion: In selected patients, extrahepatic surgery or interventional endoscopies can be safely performed after portal hypertension has been controlled by TIPS.

Background: The protein concentration in ascites is usually low in cirrhosis because capillarization and defenestration of the sinusoids limit diffusion of large proteins from plasma to the space of Disse. However, some cirrhotic patients have high-protein ascites (HPA)., Aim: The aim of this study was to describe and compare the characteristics and prognosis between cirrhotic patients with HPA (>20 g/l) and patients with low-protein ascites (LPA)., Patients and Methods: In this longitudinal observational prospective cohort study, all consecutive cirrhotic patients with ascites hospitalized in our tertiary liver center were included and followed for up to 2 years, provided that they had no other cause of HPA. HPA was defined as protein concentrations of more than 20 g/l., Results: Among 107 patients included, 19 (17.8%) had HPA. HPA patients had more refractory ascites (63 vs. 34%), better liver functions, and a higher 1-year transplant-free survival rate compared with LPA patients (P<0.05). Portal hypertension parameters were not different. During follow-up, 47% of HPA patients were treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts versus 18% of LPA patients, whereas 15 LPA patients required liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease versus only one HPA patient. We observed higher protein filtration and less pericellular, centrilobular, and sinusoidal fibrosis in cirrhotic HPA livers compared with LPA livers., Conclusion: Almost 20% of cirrhotic patients with ascites have HPA (>20 g/l). These patients have better liver functions and a higher 1-year survival than those with LPA, even though ascites are more often refractory.

Background: Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is usually performed when a percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is contraindicated. TJLB is an invasive procedure and the patient's tolerance may be variable., Aim: To compare patient tolerance and quality of the biopsy sample between PLB and TJLB., Patients and Methods: A total of 143 patients underwent a liver biopsy; of these, 75 underwent TJLB and 68 underwent PLB. To evaluate patient tolerance, we used a visual analog scale that scored the intensity of the symptoms. The length of the biopsy sample and the total number of portal tracts per biopsy were also determined for assessment of biopsy quality., Results: The biopsy sample length was similar in both groups (18.88 ± 8.83 mm on PLB vs. 18.26 ± 10.30 mm on TJLB). No differences were found in the number of portal tracts between the two groups (10.43 ± 8.25 on TJLB vs. 12 ± 10.09 on PLB). Fewer complications were observed in the TJLB group compared with the PLB group (P=0.002).Further, higher degree of pain was reported by patients who underwent PLB compared with patients who underwent TJLB (3.18 ± 3.17 vs. 1.19 ± 2.07); as such, there was a greater need for analgesics on PLB., Conclusion: TJLB and PLB techniques provide similar quality of tissue samples; however, TJLB is less painful and therefore better tolerated by patients.