Search

Background: Cardiovascular events are common during hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) being the second most relevant complication. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score in predicting NOAF during hospitalization for CAP., Methods: Patients admitted for CAP were prospectively assessed using CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc. The end-point of the study was the occurrence of any objectively documented episode of NOAF during hospitalization in patients that were in sinus rhythm at hospital admission., Results: Of 468 patients enrolled (median age 76 years), 48 (10.3%) experienced NOAF during hospitalization. They were older, had more comorbidities, more severe pneumonia, and higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc than those who remained in sinus rhythm (4.4 ± 1.6 vs 3.4 ± 1.9, respectively; p < .0001). There was a direct relationship between CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and risk of NOAF. At ROC curve analysis, a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score > 3 was the most accurate cut-off for prediction of NOAF (AUC 0.653; 95% CI 0.577-0.729; p = .001). In two different multivariable models, each CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc point increase and a score > 3 both were independently associated with NOAF (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.09-1.55; p = .003 and 2.3; 95% CI 1.19-4.44; p = .007, respectively)., Conclusions: CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is an accurate and independent predictor of NOAF in patients with CAP, and a score > 3 features a population at high risk of developing the arrhythmia during hospitalization. This simple and effective tool should be incorporated in the evaluation of patients hospitalized for CAP, with implications ranging from arrhythmic prevention to anticoagulation management., (Copyright © 2019 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Oral anticoagulants offer the best long-term protection against ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are cumbersome to use and their prescription is far from guidelines recommendations. We report the results of a large survey on the attitudes of prescription of VKA in patients with AF., Methods: 7148 patients were enrolled by 196 Internal Medicine (MED) and 164 Cardiology (CARD) centers, and VKA specifically analyzed. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks were evaluated by means of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores, and a study-specific bleeding score (modified HAS-BLED)., Results: 63.9% of non-valvular patients had a CHADS2 score≥2 (MED: 75.3%-CARD: 53.1%), and 28.4% a bleeding score≥3 (41.9% MED-15.8% CARD). VKA were prescribed in 55.5% of non-valvular patients (46.3% MED and 64.2% CARD), in 81% of high-risk valvular patients and in 58.8% of the overall study population. Among patients at high risk of bleeding (score≥3), VKA were prescribed in 26.9% of subjects, while, in the subgroup at high risk of thrombosis (CHADS2 Score<2), these were prescribed in 54.4%. Age≥75, paroxysmal AF, cognitive impairment, need for assistance, CHADS2<2 and bleeding score≥3 were independent predictors of non-use of VKA., Conclusions: Oral anticoagulants are more frequently used in CARD than in MED, plausibly due to greater complexity of MED patients. Stratification of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk significantly drives the choice for VKA. However the fraction of patients in whom prescription or non-prescription is based on other individual characteristics is not negligible., (Copyright © 2013 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)