Search

Thalamocortical axons must cross a complex cellular terrain through the developing forebrain, and this terrain has to be understood for us to learn how thalamocortical axons reach their destinations. Selective fasciculation, guidepost cells and various diencephalic and telencephalic gradients have been implicated in thalamocortical guidance. As our understanding of the relevant forebrain patterns has increased, so has our knowledge of the guidance mechanisms. Our aim here is to review recent observations of cellular and molecular mechanisms related to: the growth of thalamofugal projections to the ventral telencephalon, thalamic axon avoidance of the hypothalamus and extension into the telencephalon to form the internal capsule, the crossing of the pallial-subpallial boundary, and the growth towards the cerebral cortex. We shall review current theories for the explanation of the maintenance and alteration of topographic order in the thalamocortical projections to the cortex. It is now increasingly clear that several mechanisms are involved at different stages of thalamocortical development, and each contributes substantially to the eventual outcome. Revealing the molecular and cellular mechanisms can help to link specific genes to details of actual developmental mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary cortical areas normally have a single mapping of the receptor array arising from a ‘point-to-point’ projection from the thalamus. We show that, for the visual cortex, this simple mapping rule breaks down when retinal input to the thalamus is altered. We utilize the monocular enucleation paradigm, which alters subcortical mappings ipsilateral to the remaining eye. We show that this manipulation produces an altered visuotopic map in area 17 with two separated, mirror-imaged representations of the central visual field. Furthermore, thalamic point-to-point connectivity is dramatically changed. There are now two overlapping geniculocortical projections: the predominant projection maps with apparently normal topography, and a second projection maps with the opposite polarity. The plane of symmetry of the duplicated anatomical projection coincides precisely with the functional map reversal and, notably, geniculocortical magnification factors are identical in the two projections. We suggest that the duplicated, abnormal geniculocortical projection is retinotopically matched to the normal projection. We speculate that aberrant geniculocortical terminals are stabilized because they have coherent activity patterns with topographically normal terminals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]