Search

Purpose: We investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based denoising halves PET acquisition time in digital PET/CT. Methods: One hundred ninety-five patients referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT were prospectively included. Body PET acquisitions were performed in list mode. Original "PET90" (90 s/bed position) was compared to reconstructed ½-duration PET (45 s/bed position) with and without AI-denoising, "PET45AI and PET45". Denoising was performed by SubtlePET™ using deep convolutional neural networks. Visual global image quality (IQ) 3-point scores and lesion detectability were evaluated. Lesion maximal and peak standardized uptake values using lean body mass (SULmax and SULpeak), metabolic volumes (MV), and liver SULmean were measured, including both standard and EARL1 (European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd) compliant SUL. Lesion-to-liver SUL ratios (LLR) and liver coefficients of variation (CVliv) were calculated. Results: PET45 showed mediocre IQ (scored poor in 8% and moderate in 68%) and lesion concordance rate with PET90 (88.7%). In PET45AI, IQ scores were similar to PET90 (P = 0.80), good in 92% and moderate in 8% for both. The lesion concordance rate between PET90 and PET45AI was 836/856 (97.7%), with 7 lesions (0.8%) only detected in PET90 and 13 (1.5%) exclusively in PET45AI. Lesion EARL1 SULpeak was not significantly different between both PET (P = 0.09). Lesion standard SULpeak, standard and EARL1 SULmax, LLR and CVliv were lower in PET45AI than in PET90 (P < 0.0001), while lesion MV and liver SULmean were higher (P < 0.0001). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between PET90 and PET45AI were observed for lesion SUL and MV (ICC ≥ 0.97) and for liver SULmean (ICC ≥ 0.87). Conclusion: AI allows [18F]FDG PET duration in digital PET/CT to be halved, while restoring degraded ½-duration PET image quality. Future multicentric studies, including other PET radiopharmaceuticals, are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Technology Introduction Thanks to companies' research and development processes, frequently involving fruitful partnerships with academic centres, and what could be acknowledged as welcome competition between PET vendors, new PET hardware and software technologies are regularly innovated and released as clinic-ready products. Advanced PET detectors Pushing the limit of detectability More recently, silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) technology has become available from the major PET vendors. Another important consideration is that PET technology is in constant development and rapidly evolving, the latest to date being SiPM PETs system and total-body PET. There were lesions only identified using the SiPM PET/CT showing that SiPM PET/CT has superior performance compared to a conventional PET/CT scanner [[41]]. Total-body PET Anybody involved in designing or analysing PET studies recognizes that limited detection sensitivity, and its consequence of image noise, is by far the biggest technical limitation in PET imaging, whether that be in clinical PET or in research studies. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. There is a need for robust biomarkers to identify patients who do not respond. We analysed 14 baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) metrics and their evolution to assess their correlation with patient outcome, compared with 7 established biological markers and 7 clinical variables. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study of 29 patients with advanced melanoma who underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT, followed by an early monitoring PET/CT (iPET) scan after 1 month of treatment and follow-up studies at 3rd (M3PET) and 6th month (M6PET). 18F-FDG uptake in immune organs (spleen, bone marrow, ileocecal valve) and derived spleen-to-liver (SLR) and bone-to-liver (BLR) ratios were reviewed by two PET readers for reproducibility analysis purposes including 14 PET variables. The most reproducible indexes were used for evaluation as predictors of overall survival (OS) in comparison with PET response using imPERCIST5, whole-body metabolic active tumour volume (WB-MATV) and biological parameters (lactate dehydrogenases (LDH), reactive protein c (CRP), white blood count (WBC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio). Results: Strong reproducibility's (intraclass coefficients of correlation (ICC) > 0.90) were observed for spleen anterior SUVpeak, spleen MV, spleen TLG, spleen length and BLRmean. ICC for SLRmean and ileocecal SUVmean were 0.86 and 0.65, respectively. In the 1-year OS 1 group, SLRmean tended to increase at each time point to reach a significant difference at M6-PET (p = 0.019). The same trends were observed with spleen SUVpeak anterior and spleen length. In the 1-year OS 0 group, a significative increase of spleen length was found at iPET, as compared with baseline PET (p = 0.014) and M3-PET (p = 0.0239). Univariable Kaplan-Meier survival analysis found that i%var spleen length, M3%var SLRmean, baseline LDH, i%var NLR and response at M6PET were all predictors of 1-year OS. Conclusions: SLRmean is recommended as a prognosticator in melanoma patients under immunotherapy: its increase greater than 25% at 3 months, compared with baseline, was associated with poor outcome after ICIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To determine EARL-compliant prognostic SUV thresholds in a mature cohort of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and to demonstrate how detrimental it is to use a threshold determined on an older-generation PET system with a newer PET/CT machine, and vice versa, or to use such a threshold with non-harmonized multicentre pooled data.Materials and methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study including 139 consecutive stage IIIA-IIIB patients. PET data were acquired as per the EANM guidelines and reconstructed with unfiltered point spread function (PSF) reconstruction. Subsequently, a 6.3 mm Gaussian filter was applied using the EQ.PET (Siemens Healthineers) methodology to meet the EANM/EARL harmonizing standards (PSFEARL). A multicentre study including non-EARL-compliant systems was simulated by randomly creating four groups of patients whose images were reconstructed with unfiltered PSF and PSF with Gaussian post-filtering of 3, 5, and 10 mm. Identification of optimal SUV thresholds was based on a two-fold cross-validation process that partitioned the overall sample into learning and validation subsamples. Proportional Cox hazards models were used to estimate age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log rank test.Results: Median follow-up was 28 months (1-104 months). For the whole population, the estimated overall survival rate at 36 months was 0.39 [0.31-0.47]. The optimal SUVmax cutoff value was 25.43 (95% CI: 23.41-26.31) and 8.47 (95% CI: 7.23-9.31) for the PSF and for the EARL-compliant dataset respectively. These SUVmax cutoff values were both significantly and independently associated with lung cancer mortality; HRs were 1.73 (1.05-2.84) and 1.92 (1.16-3.19) for the PSF and the EARL-compliant dataset respectively. When (i) applying the optimal PSF SUVmax cutoff on an EARL-compliant dataset and the optimal EARL SUVmax cutoff on a PSF dataset or (ii) applying the optimal EARL compliant SUVmax cutoff to a simulated multicentre dataset, the tumour SUVmax was no longer significantly associated with lung cancer mortality.Conclusion: The present study provides the PET community with an EARL-compliant SUVmax as an independent prognosticator for advanced NSCLC that should be confirmed in a larger cohort, ideally at other EARL accredited centres, and highlights the need to harmonize PET quantitative metrics when using them for risk stratification of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Our aim was (1) to evaluate the prevalence of steatosis in lymphoma patients and its evolution during treatment; (2) to evaluate the impact of hepatic steatosis on 18F-FDG liver uptake; and (3) to study how hepatic steatosis affects the Deauville score (DS) for discriminating between responders and non-responders.Methods: Over a 1-year period, 358 PET scans from 227 patients [122 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 57 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 48 Follicular lymphoma (FL)] referred for baseline (n = 143), interim (n = 79) and end-of-treatment (EoT, n = 136) PET scans were reviewed. Steatosis was diagnosed on the unenhanced CT part of PET/CT examinations using a cut-off value of 42 Hounsfield units (HU). EARL-compliant SULmax were recorded on the liver and the tumour target lesion. DS were then computed.Results: Prevalence of steatosis at baseline, interim and EoT PET was 15/143 (10.5%), 6/79 (7.6%) and 16/136 (11.8%), respectively (p = 0.62).Ten out of 27 steatotic patients (37.0%) displayed a steatotic liver on all examinations. Six patients (22.2%) had a disappearance of hepatic steatosis during their time-course of treatment. Only one patient developed steatosis during his course of treatment. Liver SULmax values were significantly lower in the steatosis versus non-steatotic groups of patients for interim (1.66 ± 0.36 versus 2.15 ± 0.27) and EoT (1.67 ± 0.29 versus 2.17 ± 0.30) PET. CT density was found to be an independent factor that correlated with liver SULmax, while BMI, blood glucose level and the type of chemotherapy regimen were not. Using a method based on this correlation to correct liver SULmax, all DS4 steatotic patients on interim (n = 1) and EoT (n = 2) PET moved to DS3.Conclusions: Steatosis is actually a theoretical but not practical issue in most patients but should be recognised and corrected in appropriate cases, namely, for those patients scored DS4 with a percentage difference between the target lesion and the liver background lower than 30%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of skeletal textural features (TFs) on baseline FDG PET in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Methods Eighty-two patients with DLBCL who underwent a bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and a PET scan between December 2008 and December 2015 were included. Two readers blinded to the BMB results visually assessed PET images for bone marrow involvement (BMI) in consensus, and a third observer drew a volume of interest (VOI) encompassing the axial skeleton and the pelvis, which was used to assess skeletal TFs. ROC analysis was used to determine the best TF able to diagnose BMI among four first-order, six second-order and 11 third-order metrics, which was then compared for diagnosis and prognosis in disease-free patients (BMB--/PET-) versus patients considered to have BMI (BMB+/PET-, BMB--/PET+, and BMB+/PET+). Results Twenty-two out of 82 patients (26.8%) had BMI: 13 BMB--/PET+, eight BMB+/PET+ and one BMB+/PET-. Among the nine BMB+ patients, one had discordant BMI identified by both visual and TF PET assessment. ROC analysis showed that SkewnessH, a first-order metric, was the best parameter for identifying BMI with sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 81.7%, respectively. SkewnessH demonstrated better discriminative power over BMB and PET visual analysis for patient stratification: hazard ratios (HR), 3.78 (P = 0.02) versus 2.81 (P = 0.06) for overall survival (OS) and HR, 3.17 (P = 0.03) versus 1.26 (P = 0.70) for progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis accounting for IPI score, bulky status, haemoglobin and SkewnessH, the only independent predictor of OS was the IPI score, while the only independent predictor of PFS was SkewnessH. Conclusion The better discriminative power of skeletal heterogeneity for risk stratification compared to BMB and PET visual analysis in the overall population, and more specifically in BMB--/PET- patients, suggests that it can be useful to identify diagnostically overlooked BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can be used as diagnostic or prognostic tools (i.e. single measurement) or for therapy monitoring (i.e. longitudinal studies) in multicentre studies. Use of quantitative parameters, such as standardized uptake values (SUVs), metabolic active tumor volumes (MATVs) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG), in a multicenter setting requires that these parameters be comparable among patients and sites, regardless of the PET/CT system used. This review describes the motivations and the methodologies for quantitative PET/CT performance harmonization with emphasis on the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT accreditation program, one of the international harmonization programs aiming at using FDG PET as a quantitative imaging biomarker. In addition, future accreditation initiatives will be discussed. The validation of the EARL accreditation program to harmonize SUVs and MATVs is described in a wide range of tumor types, with focus on therapy assessment using either the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria or PET Evaluation Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), as well as liver-based scales such as the Deauville score. Finally, also presented in this paper are the results from a survey across 51 EARL-accredited centers reporting how the program was implemented and its impact on daily routine and in clinical trials, harmonization of new metrics such as MATV and heterogeneity features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Quantification of tumour heterogeneity in PET images has recently gained interest, but has been shown to be dependent on image reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the EANM/EARL accreditation program on selected F-FDG heterogeneity metrics. Methods: To carry out our study, we prospectively analysed 71 tumours in 60 biopsy-proven lung cancer patient acquisitions reconstructed with unfiltered point spread function (PSF) positron emission tomography (PET) images (optimised for diagnostic purposes), PSF-reconstructed images with a 7-mm Gaussian filter (PSF) chosen to meet European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) 1.0 harmonising standards, and EANM Research Ltd. (EARL)-compliant ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) images. Delineation was performed with fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian (FLAB) algorithm on PSF images and reported on PSF and OSEM ones, and with a 50 % standardised uptake values (SUV) threshold (SUV) applied independently to each image. Robust and repeatable heterogeneity metrics including 1st-order [area under the curve of the cumulative histogram (CH)], 2nd-order (entropy, correlation, and dissimilarity), and 3rd-order [high-intensity larger area emphasis (HILAE) and zone percentage (ZP)] textural features (TF) were statistically compared. Results: Volumes obtained with SUV were significantly smaller than FLAB-derived ones, and were significantly smaller in PSF images compared to OSEM and PSF images. PSF-reconstructed images showed significantly higher SUVmax and SUVmean values, as well as heterogeneity for CH, dissimilarity, correlation, and HILAE, and a wider range of heterogeneity values than OSEM images for most of the metrics considered, especially when analysing larger tumours. Histological subtypes had no impact on TF distribution. No significant difference was observed between any of the considered metrics (SUV or heterogeneity features) that we extracted from OSEM and PSF reconstructions. Furthermore, the distributions of TF for OSEM and PSF reconstructions according to tumour volumes were similar for all ranges of volumes. Conclusion: PSF reconstruction with Gaussian filtering chosen to meet harmonising standards resulted in similar SUV values and heterogeneity information as compared to OSEM images, which validates its use within the harmonisation strategy context. However, unfiltered PSF-reconstructed images also showed higher heterogeneity according to some metrics, as well as a wider range of heterogeneity values than OSEM images for most of the metrics considered, especially when analysing larger tumours. This suggests that, whenever available, unfiltered PSF images should also be exploited to obtain the most discriminative quantitative heterogeneity features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

However, will these proportions be the same for COVID-19-related papers in nuclear medicine, necessarily written during the pandemic, or will we find an underrepresentation of female authors? Future gender studies covering the entire duration of the COVID-19 pandemic will ultimately show whether it will have had an impact on female scientific output in general, including grant applications and the initiation/finalization of research projects during the pandemic. [Extracted from the article]

The authors comment on the combination of a high total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and gene expression profiling (GEP) for a risk stratification in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). They determine the role of GEP in the identification of multiple genetic abnormalities in DLBCL. They also discuss the use of multiple positron emission tomography (PET) metrics in the prognosis of patients with DLBCL.

Purpose: We prospectively evaluated whether a strategy using point spread function (PSF) reconstruction for both diagnostic and quantitative analysis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients meets the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines for harmonization of quantitative values. Methods: The NEMA NU-2 phantom was used to determine the optimal filter to apply to PSF-reconstructed images in order to obtain recovery coefficients (RCs) fulfilling the EANM guidelines for tumour positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (PSF). PET data of 52 consecutive NSCLC patients were reconstructed with unfiltered PSF reconstruction (PSF), PSF and with a conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm known to meet EANM guidelines. To mimic a situation in which a patient would undergo pre- and post-therapy PET scans on different generation PET systems, standardized uptake values (SUVs) for OSEM reconstruction were compared to SUVs for PSF and PSF reconstruction. Results: Overall, in 195 lesions, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the mean ratio between PSF and OSEM data was 1.03 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.12] and 1.02 (95 % CI 0.90-1.14) for SUV and SUV, respectively. No difference was noticed when analysing lesions based on their size and location or on patient body habitus and image noise. Ten patients (84 lesions) underwent two PET scans for response monitoring. Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria, there was an almost perfect agreement between OSEM/OSEM (current standard) and OSEM/PSF or PSF/OSEM with kappa values of 0.95 (95 % CI 0.91-1.00) and 0.99 (95 % CI 0.96-1.00), respectively. The use of PSF either for pre- or post-treatment (i.e. OSEM/PSF or PSF/OSEM) showed considerably less agreement with kappa values of 0.75 (95 % CI 0.67-0.83) and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.78-0.94), respectively. Conclusion: Protocol-optimized images and compliance with EANM guidelines allowed for a reliable pre- and post-therapy evaluation when using different generation PET systems. These data obtained in NSCLC patients could be extrapolated to other solid tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeWe assessed whether imaging αvβ3 integrin could distinguish mature teratoma from necrosis in human non-seminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) post-chemotherapy residual masses.MethodsHuman embryonal carcinoma xenografts (six/rat) were untreated (controls) or treated to form mature teratomas with low-dose cisplatin and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) over a period of 8 weeks. In another group, necrosis was induced in xenografts with high-dose cisplatin plus etoposide (two cycles).18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) small animal positron emission tomography (SA PET) imaging was performed in three rats (one control and two treated for 4 and 8 weeks with cisplatin+ATRA). Imaging of αvβ3 expression was performed in six rats bearing mature teratomas and two rats with necrotic lesions on a microSPECT/CT device after injection of the tracer [99mTc]HYNIC-RGD [6-hydrazinonicotinic acid conjugated to cyclo(Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Lys)]. Correlative immunohistochemistry studies of human and mouse αvβ3 expression were performed.ResultsCisplatin+ATRA induced differentiation of the xenografts. After 8 weeks, some glandular structures and mesenchymal cells were visible; in contrast, control tumours showed undifferentiated tissues. SA PET imaging showed that mature teratoma had very low avidity for 18F-FDG [mean standardised uptake value (SUVmean) = 0.48 ± 0.05] compared to untreated embryonal carcinoma (SUVmean = 0.92 ± 0.13) (p = 0.005). αvβ3 imaging accurately distinguished mature teratoma (tumour to muscle ratio = 4.29 ± 1.57) from necrosis (tumour to muscle ratio = 1.3 ± 0.26) (p = 0.0002). Immunohistochemistry studies showed that αvβ3 integrin expression was strong in the glandular structures of mature teratoma lesions and negative in host stroma.ConclusionImaging αvβ3 integrin accurately distinguished mature teratoma from necrosis following cisplatin-based treatment in human NSGCT xenografts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article dicusses the survey that aims to shed light on the unreported variability in the standardized uptake values ( SUVs). It mentions the significance of the SUVs as non-invasive quantitative imaging biomarkers. Strategies are proposed based on the survey including the need to systematically ask the patients to weigh themselves 2 days prior to the positron emission tomography (PET) examination.

An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The formulae for Dice and Jaccard indices used to assess volumes concordance should read as follows: [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the case study of a 57-year-old male patient where his computed tomography does not visualize the bladder tumor. It adds that positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography (CT) were performed 60 minutes after intravenous injection of furosemide. The article discusses a case that shows the role of diuretics on medical imaging for urethelial bladder cancer.