Search

Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of different government prenatal screening (PNS) policies on the uptake of PNS and prenatal diagnostic testing (PND) over the periods 2001–2003 (PNS on request), 2004–2006 (permission to offer the first-trimester combined test (FCT) to women of advanced maternal age (AMA), with women aged <36 years informed on explicit request) and 2007–2010 (introduction of population screening) and to evaluate whether trends in uptake are related to maternal age. The indication AMA for PND is still warranted, and the costs for FCT are only reimbursed for AMA women. Study design: Analysis of data on the first- and second-trimester screening program (n =41,600) for Down syndrome (DS) and on PND (n =10,795) performed from 2001 to 2010 in the region North-Holland of the Netherlands. To evaluate the actual participation in PNS and PND in different maternal age groups, estimation of the age distribution of women who underwent a fetal anomaly scan in 2009 (n =14,481) was used as a reference population (participation of 85.2%). Results: The overall uptake of FCT was 35.2% in 2010. Over the years the number of FCT in all age groups increased significantly (P <0.001). Overall the number of PND decreased significantly; the number of PND for AMA decreased and the number of PND for increased risk at FCT (in women <36 and ≥36 years) increased (P <0.05). Since 2004 significantly more DS cases were detected with FCT in AMA women and fewer with PND for AMA, and since 2007 more DS cases were detected with FCT in women <36 years (P <0.001). Conclusion: The effect of the national screening program is limited. Significantly more women opt for PNS but the overall uptake remains low, especially in younger women. A significant number of AMA women still opt for PND for AMA. The choice for FCT and PND for AMA seems dependent on background risk. To accomplish a more effective screening policy, reimbursement of the cost of the test should apply to all women and the indication for PND for AMA should be abolished. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement for measurement of the size and volume of a niche and assessment of the shape, with the use of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. Study design In this reproducibility study, 20 3D ultrasound volumes of uteri with a niche were selected, based on complete visualisation of the uterus and niche in both the longitudinal and transversal plane. Niche measurements were performed off-line twice by one observer and once by another observer. Niche measurements and assessment of shape were performed in the longitudinal and transversal plane, and niche volume in the longitudinal plane. The mean difference, 95% limits of agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver agreement. Results The interobserver agreement was excellent for all niche measurements (ICC >0.86), including depth and residual myometrial thickness (RMT), except for width at niche base in the transversal plane (ICC 0.74) and niche volume (ICC 0.79), which were classified as good agreement. Wide limits of agreement and a high mean difference were found for maximal width in the transversal plane. The intraobserver agreement was excellent for all measurements (ICC >0.80), except for RMT in the longitudinal and transversal plane, which were classified as good agreement (ICC 0.73 and 0.62, respectively). Wide limits of agreement were found for maximal width and width at niche base in the transversal plane. The overall agreement in the transversal plane was lower than in the longitudinal plane, but still all in the range of good agreement. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was good to poor for the assessment of niche shape. Conclusion Using 3D ultrasound, various niche parameters, including depth (both perpendicular to niche base and maximal depth), maximal width, width at niche base, RMT and volume, can be measured with a high level of agreement, in particular if measured in the longitudinal plane. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]