Search

Objective: With the increased use of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) has increased due to its technical advantages. On the other hand, RALH has some disadvantages, including its high cost, which includes not only the purchase price of robotic technology systems but also the running cost and long preparation time for setting assistant robots. Therefore, an overall understanding of the characteristics of RALH is needed. Study design: We reviewed the medical records of 432 patients with TLH and 93 patients with RALH from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. In this analysis, we excluded certain cases with concomitant laparoscopic cystectomy (LC) and a heavy uterus (> 400 g). First, the patient characteristics of the TLH and RALH groups, including operation time and blood loss amount, were compared. Then, among these cases, we sought to predict difficult cases for TLH and RALH by identifying risk factors related to each of the following three categories of operational complications: “long operation time”, “massive blood loss” and “other complications”. For this purpose, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of each of 7 representative factors, namely, “advanced age”, “high body mass index (BMI)”, “nulliparity”, “concomitant pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA)”, “heavy uterus”, “abdominal adhesion”, and “large leiomyoma”. Results: In the simple comparison without various factors, there was an advantage of RALH in both the average operation time and blood loss amount. However, in the multivariate logistic regression analyses, a significant risk was detected in the following relationships: 1) between “long-term operation” and “abdominal adhesion” and 2) between “other complications” and “heavy uterus”. Conclusions: RALH has sufficient advantages over TLH regarding at least in terms of blood loss amount; however, since RALH may have potential weaknesses in the context of complex cases, additional cases and analyses are needed.

Objective: To reduce intraoperative blood loss in laparoscopic myomectomy, uterine artery occlusion or temporary uterine artery clipping have been employed. Recently, in addition to these techniques, temporary uterine artery ligation has been reported as a new method that has less invasive effects on fertility and needs no special devices to be used. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of temporary uterine artery ligation to minimize intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic myomectomy. Study Design: This was a retrospective case-control study at the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Mizonokuchi, Teikyo University School of Medicine. A total of 264 patients with uterine leiomyoma who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy were enrolled in this study. We divided the patients into two groups, those who underwent temporary uterine artery ligation (52 patients) and those who did not (212 patients) and compared the operation time, blood loss volume, and other indexes. Second, to identify influential factors, we assessed the effects of 11 representative factors on massive blood loss or a prolonged operation time using multivariate analysis. Results: The intraoperative blood loss volume was decreased by approximately half with the addition of temporary uterine artery ligation (75.1 ± 73.6 ml vs. 158.5 ± 233.2 ml, p = 0.011), but the operation time was longer (200.5 ± 46.9 min vs. 160.1 ± 51.3 min, p