Search

Purpose Haemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a severe complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which significantly affects patients’ quality of life. However, no qualitative studies have described to date the experience of patients who have developed this complication. Therefore, the aim of this interpretative phenomenological study performed on 2019 was to explore the experience of patients who developed HC after HSCT. Method A purposeful sample of nine patients who had experienced at least one episode of HC after the HSCT were approached. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and then analysed according to Giorgi's method. Member checking of the findings was also performed. Results The experience of the participants with HC after HSCT has been summarised around three main themes: “Being alerted”, “It has arrived” and “It has been overcome.” Patients reported to have been informed regarding the HC; after the first devastating symptoms, they reported fear and in searching for causes and strategies to alleviate the problem, which seemed to be never resolved. Patients’ experience with HC is complex and experienced dramatically due to the pain and the discomforting consequences of the treatments received; they develop a sense of exhaustion that can further increase both their physical and emotional burden. The process of recovery from the huge impact, required time over the end of the HC symptoms. Conclusions Patients’ experience of HC is complex, and varies according to the various phases of the complication. HC creates an increased physical and psychological stresses that demand additional coping strategies: therefore, the emotional support of patients is crucial. Moreover, strategies used autonomously by patients to alleviate symptoms are at merit of consideration in future studies.

Purpose Defining patients as ‘terminally-ill’ may be difficult. Therefore, determining when to shift the goal of care from curative to comfort care may be extremely challenging. The aim of this study was to merge when and how Registered Nurses (RNs) and Nurses' Assistants (NAs) adjust end-of-life care to pursue patient comfort at the end of their lives. Methods A descriptive qualitative study based on multiple focus groups was performed in 2017 according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research guidelines. In all, 25 RNs and 16 NAs across seven north-east Italian facilities that provide end-of-life care, voluntarily participated in the study. Each focus group was conducted following the same interview guide with open-ended questions, and was audiotaped. A thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts. Results The process of nursing care plan adjustment is based upon two main themes, around ‘when’ and ‘how’ to adjust it. Regarding when, ‘Detecting the turning point’, and ‘Being ready to change continuously until the end’ emerged as the main sub-themes. Regarding how, ‘Weighing harms and benefits of nursing care interventions’; ‘Advocating for patients’ wishes', ‘Sharing the adjustments inside the team at different levels’, ‘Involving family in the adjustments of nursing care’; and ‘Allowing care to move away from evidence-based practice’ were the sub-themes emerged. Conclusions Shedding light on the implicit decisional processes that inform care adjustments and the implementation of related strategies is essential to improve the quality of end-of-life care given that an early detection of the terminal phase has been reported to result in changes of care improving outcomes.

Purpose to develop a tool for measuring the difficulty of intravenous line insertion in cancer patients (DIVA-CP) receiving peripheral chemotherapy. Methods a pilot-validation study divided into two phases was performed in a north-eastern Italian outpatient chemotherapy centre. In the first phase, a review of the literature and brainstorming sessions/direct discussions among expert oncology nurses were used to develop items on the DIVA-CP tool, and a panel of expert oncology nurses assessed the tool face and content validity. In the second phase, 260 adult patients undergoing single chemotherapy cycles were consecutively enrolled. Data was analysed for construct validity (explorative factor analysis) and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa). Results a 10-item tool was developed with four factors that were identified through factor analysis, explaining a total variance of 61.578%: accessibility to first choice veins (23.057%), venous fragility (15.197%), probable difficulties during the procedure (12.642%), and repeated exposure (10.691%). The tool demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (κ > 0.61 for 7 out of 10 items). Conclusions the DIVA-CP tool is still a pilot instrument that needs to be improved through future studies. The tool has great potential and may perform an important role in oncological settings, allowing for easier venous assessment of patients receiving peripheral chemotherapy who are at risk of difficult intravenous access insertion. In addition, this instrument may help nurses to identify patients that may benefit from a central catheter promptly.

Purposes “Difficult patients”, as labelled by staff members, have been studied for their peculiarities in primary care, family and internal medicine, physiotherapy, psychiatry, dermatology, and dentistry. However, no data has been documented on “difficult patients” in hospice care settings. The aim of the study was to address the following research questions: (a) When do nursing staff label a patient suffering from advanced cancer as “difficult” in a hospice care setting? (b) What are the problems that the nursing staff face in dealing with them, and (c) What are the specific strategies that nursing staff adopt in their daily practice to overcome issues and improve their relationship with “difficult patients”? Methods A qualitative descriptive study design was performed in 2018 and reported according to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research. Three focus groups were conducted in three hospice settings in Northern Italy by involving 10 nurses and six nurses’ aides. Three trained researchers performed interviews based on a set of open questions. Qualitative content analysis of the data collected was then performed by the same researchers. Results Participants were labelled “difficult patients” according to three main themes: (1) “Feeling rejected”; (2) “Feeling uncomfortable with the life story experienced by the patient” and (3) “Experiencing the limits of the profession”. Participants reported feeling “Frustrated”, “Exhausted”, “Powerless”, “Overwhelmed” or “Embarrassed” when dealing with “difficult patients”. Strategies to overcome these issues emerged. Conclusions As in other settings, hospice care nursing staff perceive some patients as “difficult”. However, differently from other contexts, “difficult patients” are perceived as such also due to their relatives, who are perceived, in some cases, as being even more “difficult” than the patients themselves. Nursing staff should be aware of their personal attitudes and emotions in caring for patients perceived as “difficult” in order to identify and timely apply strategies to overcome issues that may compromise the therapeutic relationship and quality of care.

Purpose Although the profile of the problems and risks associated with cancer patients has expanded over the past few years, and so has our available knowledge on the concordance between patients and nurses, there is a lack of evidence concerning neurosurgical patients. In comparison with patients who have neoplasm located in other lobes, those with frontal lobe cancer can suffer from personality changes, disinhibition, apathy, and higher-order attentional difficulties. Such behavior may give rise to a stigma, and consequently, pose a risk to have their problems misunderstood by caregivers, and be at greater risk than they are perceived to be. Objective To explore the risk of nurses underestimating the problems of patients who were operated on for frontal neoplasm, compared to patients suffering from neoplasms located in other cerebral lobes. Methods A prospective study was undertaken in 2008 in Italy. Patients admitted to the hospital with brain neoplasm were eligible for the study. For each patient with a frontal lobe neoplasm, a corresponding patient with a cerebral neoplasm located in either the temporal, parietal or occipital lobes was also included. Nurses working in the units involved and providing care to these patients were also included. On the afternoon of the 2nd postoperative day, the researcher interviewed both the patients, and the registered nurses (RNs) responsible for the patients' care, in regards to pain intensity, dependence in activities of daily living, anxiety and depression, and fear of falling, as each was perceived by patients and nurses. The level of concordance between the patients' and nurses' responses was calculated. Results Forty-six patients were considered (mean age 53.5 years); 23 had surgery for a frontal brain neoplasm and 23 for brain neoplasms located in either the temporal, parietal, or occipital areas. Overall, patients operated on for frontal lobe neoplasms had much of the same risks of underestimation of their problems, as patients with other cerebral neoplasms. Conclusions Patients with frontal lobe neoplasms seemed, overall, to run the same risk of their problems being underestimated as patients with cerebral neoplasms located at other sites. Neurosurgical nurses tended to overestimate patients' problems, particularly in cases with neoplasms not located in the frontal lobe. This unexpected finding needs to be addressed with further research, and might warrant a different approach to caring for patients with frontal lobe neoplasms, whose problems are overestimated less, so that they might receive less supportive care.