1. An extended goal programming model for the multiobjective integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problem
- Author
-
Washington Alves de Oliveira, Diego Jacinto Fiorotto, Dylan Jones, and Xiang Song
- Subjects
050210 logistics & transportation ,021103 operations research ,Information Systems and Management ,General Computer Science ,Cost efficiency ,Process (engineering) ,Computer science ,05 social sciences ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,02 engineering and technology ,Management Science and Operations Research ,Industrial engineering ,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering ,Sizing ,Weighting ,Cutting stock problem ,Modeling and Simulation ,Goal programming ,0502 economics and business ,Column generation ,Distributed manufacturing - Abstract
Lot sizing and cutting stock problems generally arise in manufacturing as a two stage connected process. Although these two problems have been addressed separately by many authors, recently, inspired by practical applications, some studies have emerged analyzing their integration. The mono-objective version of the integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problem can be considered as an enhancement that minimizes the global production cost. However, it does not include the multiple criteria that can arise from the inclusion of multiple stakeholders in a modern, distributed manufacturing process. This paper aims to introduce a new extended goal programming model for the integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problem which models the arising multiple criteria by a set of goals representing the interests of different stakeholders in the manufacturing process. This formulation allows for the consideration of the balance between the conflicting goals of multiple stakeholders and the cost efficiency of the overall process. In order to efficiently solve the proposed model, a column generation based heuristic procedure is applied. The trade-offs among the various criteria related to the problem are assessed, and a series of computational experiments are performed. The computational results compare individual criteria weighting schemes and evaluate the goals’ sensitivity using performance profiles and time-to-target plots methodologies.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF