Search

Purpose: Minimizing complications is an important focus in hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients given the associated high morbidity and mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes associated with the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to other surgical approaches used for HHA. Methods: Studies evaluating HHA-treated FNFs using the DAA were compared through meta-analysis to all other surgical approaches combined and as distinct subgroups. Outcomes included overall complication rate, mortality rate, dislocation rate, reoperation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate, infection rate, length of stay (LOS), mobility, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and postoperative pain. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling 2,018 HHAs. DAA significantly reduced the overall complication rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.94, p = 0.01), dislocation rate (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.77, p = 0.01), and LOS (mean difference (MD) = −1.31 days, 95% CI − 2.12 to − 0.50, p = 0.002). Findings from studies that were not appropriate for meta-analysis were qualitatively summarized and suggested improved mobility and reduced postoperative pain with the DAA. Significant differences were not detected in any of the remaining outcomes. Conclusion: The DAA HHA appears to be safer, reduces hospital stay, and may improve early functional recovery. This article supports the DAA HHA as a safe option for the management of displaced intracapsular FNFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to compare the differences between direct anterior approach (DAA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) in hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) after displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) in early functional outcome, hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality rates. Methods: This non-interventional retrospective study, carried out at a tertiary trauma centre within the Spanish National Health System, included all patients who underwent a bipolar HHA between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2019 performed by 2 of our hip unit surgeons. Results: A total of 94 patients were included (40 in DAA group and 54 in DLA group). Median follow-up was 19.2 months (range 8–30.8 months). Postoperative degree of mobilisation showed statistically significant differences in favour of DAA group, where 35% of patients were able to walk with no assistance after surgery. DAA group had 1 day less of hospitalisation in contrast with DLA group overall (8 days vs 9 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were not detected in comparing postoperative complications, re-operations rates or 6-months mortality rate. Conclusion: Our study highlights the benefits of DAA for HHA after displaced FNF in terms of postoperative mobilisation degree and hospitalisation length of stay when compared to DLA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cemented hemiarthroplasty is a well-documented treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). However, there are not many cohort studies comparing different types of hemiarthroplasty (HA). Objective: To compare CPT and Lubinus SP2 HA for FNF patients concerning complications and radiological measurements. Methods: From January 1, 2013, CPT was introduced instead of Lubinus SP2 as the new cemented HA due to a regional procurement. Data were retrieved 3 years prior and after the introduction. All patient health records were retrospectively reviewed for types of implant, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and duration of admission. All X-ray images were analyzed for radiological measurements concerning offset, stem angulation and cement filling. Mortality and major complications within 1 year were retrieved from patient health records as well as the Danish National Patient Registry. Major complications were defined as dislocations, periprosthetic fractures and revisions. Results: 584 cemented HA were included, 300 CPT and 284 with Lubinus SP2. The mean age (SD) was 82 (8.2) years, and there was no baseline difference between the groups concerning age, sex, ASA score and mortality. There were 8.7% major complications for CPT and 9.2% for Lubinus SP2 (p = 0.836). There were, however, seven periprosthetic fractures in the CPT group and one in the Lubinus SP2 group (p = 0.04). In contrast, there were 20 dislocations in the Lubinus SP2 group and 10 in the CPT group (p = 0.042). There was no statistical difference between the stem angulation and periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.824) or major complications (p = 0.602). The Lubinus SP2 had a mean plus 2.7 mm offset postoperatively (p = 0.001), while the CPT had plus 10.6 mm (p < 0.000). The mean (SD) angle of the stems was 1.39 (1.75) degrees for Lubinus SP2 and 2.46 (1.99) for CPT. There was no difference in cementation (p = 0.308). Conclusion: There was no overall statistical difference between the CPT and Lubinus SP2 stem regarding major complications. However, the CPT had a higher prevalence of periprosthetic fractures, while the Lubinus SP2 had a higher dislocation prevalence. The CPT stem had overcorrection of offset and a higher degree of varus positioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We wished to compare the outcome of two types of cemented and uncemented modern stem design implants after hemiarthroplasty, with both an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel rating of 10A.Methods: This retrospective study compares data obtained from two centres, with a total study population of 655 (n = 393 cemented, n = 262 uncemented). Patients were matched at baseline for gender, age, surgery side, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index and pre-operative haemoglobin level. Outcome measurements were prosthesis-related complications, pre- and post-operative, with reoperation rate and mortality and other complications after 1 year, surgery time, blood loss and immobility at discharge.Results: There were no significant differences in mortality after 1 year, total other complications, immobility at the time of discharge and total prosthesis-related complications between both groups. Significantly more periprosthetic fractures and post-operative infections were seen in the uncemented group with significantly more reoperations compared to the cemented group. Significant differences were seen in cardiovascular complications, blood loss and surgery time in favour of the uncemented group.Conclusions: In consequence of the significant higher prosthesis-related complications (e.g. infections, periprosthetic fractures and reoperations) in the uncemented group in this study, we recommend cemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with a femoral neck fracture.Level of evidence: Level III, Case Controlled Study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) is associated with improved functional and clinical outcomes compared to other surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Materials and methods: Randomized trials and cohort studies of hemiarthroplasty performed via DAA versus another surgical approach (anterolateral, lateral, posterolateral, posterior) were included. Our primary outcome was postoperative functional mobility. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rate, dislocation rate, perioperative fracture, infection rate, re-operation rate, overall mortality, operative time, pain, intra-operative blood loss, and length of stay. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 698 hips (330 direct anterior, 57 anterolateral, 89 lateral, 114 posterolateral, 108 posterior approach). With regard to functional mobility, DAA was favored in 4 studies, and no study favored another approach over DAA. DAA had a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to posterior capsular approaches. Analysis of other secondary outcomes did not identify statistically significant differences. Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the DAA for hemiarthroplasty. Available evidence suggests superior early functional mobility with the DAA. The DAA is associated with a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to posterior capsular approaches for hemiarthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]